2023

Redefining Boundaries:  The U.S. military, particularly through initiatives like RadioBio by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), appears to be signaling a significant shift in its approach to the study of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Historically focused on the thermal effects of RF radiation, recent studies, and projects suggest a deeper […]

The study published in the “Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine,” focuses on the biological effects of chronic exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs) simulating the 5G mobile network. This research is particularly relevant in today’s context, where 5G technology is rapidly expanding and its potential impact on health is a topic of public and scientific […]

A Deep Dive into the Effects of Electromagnetic Fields Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  Introduction: The conversation around the health impacts of electromagnetic fields (EMF) and radiofrequency radiation (RFR) takes a significant turn with the comprehensive research compilation by […]

A Comprehensive Analysis of Electromagnetic Fields and Health Risks Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  Introduction: The BioInitiative Report, first published in 2007 and updated in 2012, represents a monumental effort in understanding the potential health risks associated with electromagnetic […]

Unraveling the Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on Human Health Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  Introduction: The REFLEX (Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Energy Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods) Project, initiated in the early […]

Unveiling the Complexities of Cell Phone Safety Research Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  Introduction: The Interphone study, often cited in discussions about cell phone safety, presents a fascinating case of how scientific research can be interpreted and reinterpreted over […]

  Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  Introduction: The debate over the health impacts of cell phone radiation has been bolstered by various significant studies, each adding a piece to the puzzle. Among these, the Ramazzini Institute Study stands out […]

Exploring the Connection Between Mobile Phone Use and Brain Tumors: Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  The current study involved 253 cases of gluomas and 194 cases of meningiomas registered in four areas in France between 2004 and 2006 and 892 matched […]

Examining the Link Between Wireless Phones and Brain Tumors:  Click here to go back to why Elon Musk and the New York Times got it wrong on cell phone radiation.  Introduction: In an era where mobile and cordless phones are nearly as ubiquitous as the air we breathe, concerns about their long-term health impacts have […]

  Continued from: Voices against the Propaganda machines RF Safe Every major study in this field, including the Interphone study (initially intended to demonstrate the safety of cell phone radiation), Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the work of life-long researchers in the […]

The Crucial Role of Expertise in Scientific Reporting:  Introduction In an era where the dissemination of scientific information is as crucial as the research itself, the role of media in presenting complex scientific issues to the public is of paramount importance. A recent article by the New York Times on the potential health risks of […]