In the rapidly advancing age of wireless technology, where cell towers sprout like weeds and 5G infrastructure promises faster connectivity, the looming question is not if these developments have an impact on our health, but how much damage has already been done. And it’s a question that can no longer be ignored as we examine the political forces enabling this unchecked expansion. Enter Kamala Harris: Vice President of the United States and a key figure in an administration that has systematically allowed corporate interests to override public safety. The truth is, casting a vote for Harris isn’t just a vote for more of the same; it’s potentially a vote for your own future health crisis—a future that might include brain tumors and neurological disorders.
The Capture of the FCC: A Story of Corporate Overreach
Let’s take a step back to understand how we got here. The Democrats have long played a central role in the corporate capture of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Under the Obama-Biden administration, a man named Tom Wheeler was appointed to head the FCC—a man who, before his appointment, was literally the face of the wireless industry as the head of the CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association). If you want to talk about the fox guarding the henhouse, this is where the conversation starts.
Wheeler’s appointment paved the way for policies that prioritized the interests of the wireless industry over public health. Despite mounting evidence from independent researchers around the world suggesting that RF (radiofrequency) radiation from cell phones and wireless networks could have serious non-thermal health effects, including cancer, Wheeler’s FCC did nothing to update the woefully outdated safety standards. Those standards, still in use today, are from 1996—before smartphones, before Wi-Fi became ubiquitous, and long before the advent of 5G.
Wheeler’s tenure marked a critical moment in the corporate capture of the FCC, turning the agency into a de facto arm of the wireless industry. Despite clear evidence of risks, the FCC continues to allow telecom companies to roll out new technologies like 5G, while burying concerns over the non-thermal effects of RF radiation, including oxidative stress, disruption of cellular signaling, and yes, cancer.
The NTP’s Cancer Findings and the Biden-Harris Administration’s Negligence
Under the Biden-Harris administration, things have only worsened. For years, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) conducted a decade-long study that uncovered clear evidence that RF radiation from cell phones could cause cancer, particularly gliomas (brain cancer) and schwannomas (heart tumors) in rats. This was no small finding. It was, and remains, one of the most significant studies ever conducted on the health impacts of RF radiation.
You’d think an administration that champions “science” and “facts” would seize on these findings, pushing for more research and stricter safety standards. But instead, the opposite happened. Under the Biden-Harris administration, funding for the NTP’s wireless research was diverted, effectively shutting down one of the few U.S. government programs that had the courage to investigate the dangers of RF radiation.
The irony here is chilling: Joe Biden lost his son, Beau Biden, to brain cancer—the very kind of cancer that RF radiation has been linked to in scientific studies. And yet, his administration has turned a blind eye to the mounting evidence, allowing the wireless industry to continue pushing technologies that may be causing the very health crises that claimed his own son’s life.
RFK Jr.’s Legal Victory and the Ongoing Corporate Influence
If this weren’t bad enough, let’s talk about the 2021 court victory by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust, who successfully sued the FCC for failing to update their safety standards in light of new scientific evidence. The court ruled that the FCC had neglected its duty by not addressing the non-thermal effects of RF radiation, including the kinds of health impacts that are invisible to the naked eye but can wreak havoc on the body’s bioelectric systems.
This should have been a watershed moment, a turning point where the government stepped up to protect the public from the dangers of RF radiation. But what has the Biden-Harris administration done since this ruling? Absolutely nothing. The FCC continues to operate under the same outdated standards that were established nearly 30 years ago. Non-thermal effects? Still unregulated. Neurological disorders? Still ignored. Cancer risks? Swept under the rug.
Public Health Neglect and the Bioelectric Threat
The science is clear. RF radiation doesn’t just heat up your tissues. It disrupts the very bioelectric signals that regulate cellular health. This bioelectric dissidence leads to oxidative stress, the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and disruptions in cellular signaling—disruptions that can lead to cancer, neurological disorders, and a host of other health problems. And yet, despite the growing body of evidence, the Democratic Party, through both the Obama-Biden and Biden-Harris administrations, has done more to protect corporate profits than public health.
Kamala Harris, as a key figure in the current administration, bears a share of this responsibility. Her administration has allowed the wireless industry to push forward unchecked, rolling out new technologies like 5G without fully understanding—or caring about—the long-term health consequences. In a world where RF radiation is increasingly inescapable, from our cell phones to our Wi-Fi routers to the 5G towers sprouting up in every neighborhood, the Democratic Party’s complicity in this corporate takeover is endangering all of us.
A Vote for Harris Is a Vote for Neglect
Kamala Harris’s political career is not just a story of corporate capture; it’s a story of public health neglect. By failing to prioritize the health risks posed by RF radiation, her administration has allowed the wireless industry to continue operating without meaningful oversight, placing millions of Americans at risk.
Cancer rates are rising. Neurological disorders are becoming more common. And the science tells us that RF radiation may be a contributing factor. Yet, the FCC, under Democratic leadership, has done nothing to address these risks. So when you cast your vote for Kamala Harris, remember: you’re not just voting for the status quo—you’re voting for a future where your health and the health of your children are at risk.
It’s time for a change, and it starts with holding our leaders accountable for the public health crises they’ve allowed to fester. Don’t let Kamala Harris’s record go unnoticed. Your vote might just be the most important decision you make—for your health and your future.
With recent scientific studies confirming the harmful effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, RF Safe is calling for decisive action to protect our children and communities.
The Urgent Need for Action
The upcoming election presents a pivotal opportunity to influence policy on issues that have been overlooked for too long. RF Safe emphasizes that this is not a partisan matter but a public health crisis that demands immediate attention.
Recent scientific studies have settled the debate over cell phone radiation hazards: RF radiation is harmful. The National Toxicology Program (NTP), in one of the most comprehensive studies on this topic, found clear evidence linking RF radiation to cancer. The study revealed the development of malignant brain tumors known as gliomas and heart tumors called schwannomas in animal models.
Expert Insight:
“The NTP study demonstrated that prolonged exposure to RF radiation can lead to DNA damage and oxidative stress, which are precursors to cancer. These findings are particularly concerning for vulnerable populations like children, whose developing brains and thinner skulls make them more susceptible.”
Children absorb more radiation than adults, and their longer lifetime exposure compounds the risks. It’s not just about cancer; non-thermal effects like DNA strand breaks and cellular dysfunction have been linked to infertility, neurological disorders, and sleep disturbances.
RF Safe’s Mission: Protecting Future Generations
Founded by John Coates, RF Safe was established not as a commercial enterprise but as a platform to raise awareness about electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure. The organization is dedicated to educating the public on how to reduce risks through practical measures and advocating for updated safety guidelines that reflect current scientific understanding.
John Coates shares:
“RFsafe.com was created in dedication to my daughter, Angel Leigh Coates, a tragedy of EMFs, to forever perpetuate her innocent love and purpose on earth. Now, she is a true angel in heaven—I feel she guides me closer to understanding. I must also be thankful for my daughter’s memory and thank God for giving me a part in His divine plan.”
Candidate Stances: Know Where They Stand
Understanding where candidates stand on RF-EMF safety and research is vital for voters concerned about public health and technological advancement. RF Safe is compiling information on the positions of key candidates:
- Kamala Harris
Despite the 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the FCC had failed to properly justify maintaining outdated RF radiation exposure guidelines, the Biden-Harris administration has allowed these antiquated standards to persist. Rather than enforcing the court’s mandate to reassess these guidelines in light of new scientific evidence, the administration has remained passive, effectively allowing the FCC to continue neglecting public health.
What’s worse, under Vice President Kamala Harris, the National Toxicology Program (NTP)—which conducted one of the most comprehensive studies linking RF radiation to cancer—was allowed to run out of funding. This halted further research that could have provided even more concrete evidence that the current FCC guidelines fail to protect the public, especially vulnerable populations like children.
In short, Harris has not made any effort to safeguard public health from a threat that has been clearly recognized by the courts. Her inaction has left millions, including children, exposed to potential risks from RF radiation, even as scientific and legal findings demand urgent reform.
Voting for Harris in 2024 is not just a vote for corporate interests—it’s a vote that could directly impact the public’s health, putting millions at risk of developing brain tumors and other serious conditions.
During his first term as president, Donald Trump’s FCC appointees maintained the status quo, favoring corporate interests in the rollout of 5G technology. One of his key appointees, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, was criticized for not prioritizing public health in updating RF radiation safety standards. This approach allowed the telecommunications industry to push forward without proper oversight, perpetuating outdated safety guidelines set in 1996, long before today’s wireless technology boom.
However, in his current campaign, Trump has acknowledged his past mistakes. Through discussions with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump has expressed a commitment to rectifying these oversights. Both figures have recognized the long-standing issue of regulatory capture at the FCC, where the agency has been influenced by the industries it is supposed to regulate. This capture has led to decades of inaction on RF radiation safety standards despite growing scientific evidence linking RF exposure to cancer, neurological disorders, and other health risks.
In this campaign, Trump has vowed to:
- Restore funding for the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) research on RF radiation, which was halted during the Biden administration despite findings linking RF radiation to cancer.
- Overhaul the FCC, breaking the stronghold of the telecommunications industry and ensuring that public health is a priority.
- Update RF safety standards to reflect the latest scientific evidence on both thermal and non-thermal effects of RF radiation.
With RFK Jr.’s expertise and relentless advocacy in holding regulatory agencies accountable, Trump sees an opportunity for real change. A Trump-Kennedy partnership would focus on reforming the FCC, ensuring that it serves public health rather than corporate profits. Trump’s promise not to repeat the mistakes of his first term signals a potential shift in the government’s approach to RF radiation safety, offering hope for long-overdue reform in 2024.
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
In stark contrast to Harris, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been a tireless advocate for RF radiation safety. His 2021 lawsuit against the FCC resulted in a historic court ruling that the agency had “failed to justify” its outdated safety standards. Kennedy has long pushed for a complete overhaul of these guidelines, emphasizing the need for regulatory bodies to recognize the dangers posed by non-thermal RF radiation exposure.
Kennedy’s stance is firmly rooted in science. He has pointed to major studies, including the NTP’s decade-long investigation, which found increased rates of brain and heart tumors in animals exposed to cell phone radiation. Kennedy has also criticized the FCC’s cozy relationship with the telecommunications industry, calling for independent research and stricter oversight to protect the public from the dangers of wireless radiation.
A vote for Kennedy in 2024 is a vote for updated safety guidelines and a government that prioritizes public health over corporate profits.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Advocacy:
RFK Jr. has been a vocal advocate for raising awareness about the potential health risks associated with cell phone radiation, especially for children. He emphasizes the need for updated safety guidelines and comprehensive research into the long-term effects of RF radiation exposure.
RF Safe encourages voters to directly ask candidates about their plans to address these urgent matters.
Key Issues: RF Safe’s Three-Step Action Plan
1. Update FCC Safety Guidelines: Embrace Modern Science
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continues to rely on outdated safety guidelines established in the 1990s, which only consider the thermal effects of RF-EMF. Recent peer-reviewed studies have conclusively demonstrated that non-thermal biological effects pose significant health risks.
Why This Matters:
- National Toxicology Program Findings: The NTP study found clear evidence linking RF radiation to cancer, including gliomas and schwannomas.
- Vulnerable Populations: Children are more susceptible due to thinner skulls and developing tissues.
- Non-Thermal Effects: Low levels of RF radiation can lead to DNA damage, oxidative stress, and disruptions in cellular repair mechanisms.
Our Demand:
The FCC must immediately update its safety guidelines to reflect current scientific understanding, incorporating both thermal and non-thermal effects to adequately protect public health.
2. Restart National Toxicology Program (NTP) Cancer Research
The NTP’s groundbreaking research on RF radiation was abruptly halted, leaving a dangerous void in understanding RF radiation’s impact on human health.
Why This Matters:
- Clear Evidence of Carcinogenic Effects: Both the NTP and the Ramazzini Institute found increased tumor incidence in the brain and heart.
- Health Policy Impact: Halting research impedes the development of effective public health policies and safety regulations.
- Therapeutic Potential: Understanding RF-EMF is crucial for medical advancements, such as treatments using specific RF frequencies to target cancer cells.
Our Demand:
Immediate restoration of funding and support for the NTP’s research is essential for crafting informed policy decisions and protecting public health.
3. End FCC Regulatory Capture: Prioritize Public Health Over Profits
Regulatory capture has allowed industry interests to influence the FCC, resulting in policies that favor corporate profits over public safety.
Why This Matters:
- Industry Influence: Appointments like that of former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, a former telecommunications lobbyist, highlight conflicts of interest.
- Public Trust and Safety: The FCC’s failure to update guidelines erodes public trust and leaves the public unprotected.
- Unchecked Technology Proliferation: Without stringent regulations, the rollout of new wireless technologies continues without sufficient safety testing.
Our Demand:
The FCC must implement measures to eliminate industry influence, ensuring that public health and safety are the primary considerations in all regulatory decisions.
The Misclassification of RF Radiation Health Risks
The misclassification of RF radiation risks has far-reaching implications:
- Bioelectric Dysregulation: Disruptions in cellular membrane potential may contribute to cancer development.
- Societal Impact: EMFs may impact hormones and brain development, potentially contributing to neurological disorders.
- Exacerbation of Diseases: RF radiation may exacerbate conditions where bioelectricity is a factor, like cancer and neurological diseases.
- Stalled Research and Innovation: Lack of comprehensive research hinders the development of safer technologies and medical interventions.
Moving Beyond the Debate
Given the accumulating scientific evidence, the conversation should shift from debating whether RF radiation is harmful to determining how best to protect public health.
Key Actions:
- Updating Safety Guidelines
- Implementing Precautionary Measures
- Continued Research and Surveillance
Take Action Now: Your Voice Can Make a Difference
The urgency of these issues cannot be overstated. Scientific evidence underscores the need for immediate action to protect our health and that of future generations.
How You Can Help:
- Contact Elected Officials: Express your concerns and demand action on updating safety guidelines and supporting research.
- Spread Awareness: Share credible information about the risks of RF-EMF exposure.
- Support Legislation: Advocate for laws that mandate lower radiation emissions and promote safer technology.
- Practice Safe Technology Use: Reduce personal exposure by using wired connections and keeping devices away from your body.
The Science Unveiled: Challenging the Myth
Landmark Studies Sound the Alarm
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) Study
Overview:
- Agency: U.S. National Toxicology Program
- Duration: Over 10 years
- Investment: $30 million
- Subjects: Over 3,000 rodents exposed to RF radiation mimicking 2G and 3G cell phone emissions
Key Findings:
- Cancer Development: Male rats exposed to RF radiation developed malignant schwannomas of the heart and gliomas of the brain.
- DNA Damage: Observed DNA damage in brain cells, indicating potential mechanisms for cancer development.
- Non-Thermal Effects: Adverse effects occurred without significant temperature increases in tissues.
Implications:
This study provided some of the most robust evidence to date that RF radiation could cause cancer in mammals. It challenged the notion that only thermal effects are harmful and highlighted the need to reconsider safety guidelines.
The Ramazzini Institute (RI) Study
Overview:
- Organization: Ramazzini Institute, Italy
- Exposure Levels: Significantly lower than the NTP study, similar to emissions from cell towers
- Subjects: Rats exposed to RF radiation throughout their lifespans
Key Findings:
- Tumor Development: Increased incidence of the same types of tumors (heart schwannomas and brain gliomas) found in the NTP study.
- Environmental Relevance: Demonstrated that even low-level RF radiation, comparable to everyday environmental exposure, could have carcinogenic effects.
Implications:
The RI study reinforced the NTP findings, suggesting that the risk is not limited to heavy cell phone use but may also stem from general environmental exposure to RF radiation.
Genetic Profiling Links to Human Cancer
Overview:
- Published: 2024
- Objective: Analyze tumors from the RI study to compare with human cancers
Key Findings:
- Morphological Similarities: Tumors in rats were morphologically similar to certain human cancers, such as low-grade gliomas.
- Genetic Alterations: Shared genetic mutations between rat tumors and human cancers were identified.
Implications:
This groundbreaking research bridged the gap between animal studies and human health, indicating that the carcinogenic effects observed in animals are relevant to humans. It challenged skeptics who dismissed animal study results as non-applicable to human health.
Human Studies Echo Animal Research
The Interphone Study
- Scope: Largest case-control study on cell phone use and brain tumors, involving 13 countries
- Findings: Heavy cell phone users had a significantly increased risk of glioma, particularly on the side of the head where the phone was held.
- Significance: Provided epidemiological evidence supporting the link between cell phone use and cancer risk.
Research by Dr. Lennart Hardell
- Focus: Long-term cell phone and cordless phone use and the risk of brain tumors
- Findings: Consistent associations between long-term use and increased risk of gliomas and acoustic neuromas
- Impact: Dr. Hardell’s work has been influential in the debate over cell phone safety, advocating for updated guidelines.
Unveiling the Mechanisms: How RF Radiation Affects the Body
Non-Thermal Biological Effects
The traditional view held that only thermal effects of RF radiation were harmful. However, recent studies have identified non-thermal mechanisms by which RF radiation can affect biological systems:
- DNA Damage: RF radiation can cause single and double-strand breaks in DNA, leading to mutations.
- Oxidative Stress: Increased production of reactive oxygen species can damage cellular components.
- Altered Gene Expression: Changes in gene expression can disrupt normal cellular function.
- Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability: RF radiation may increase the permeability of the blood-brain barrier, allowing harmful substances to enter the brain.
Exacerbation of Chronic Diseases
By disrupting cellular processes, RF radiation may exacerbate existing chronic diseases or contribute to the development of new health issues, including:
- Neurological Disorders: Potential links to Alzheimer’s disease and cognitive impairments.
- Reproductive Issues: Effects on fertility and developmental impacts on offspring.
- Cardiovascular Problems: Possible effects on heart health due to cellular stress.
Why Haven’t We Heard This Before?
Regulatory Capture and Industry Influence
Despite the growing body of evidence, safety guidelines have remained unchanged, primarily due to:
- Industry Influence: The telecommunications industry has significant financial interests in maintaining the status quo and may downplay or discredit studies showing harmful effects.
- Regulatory Inertia: Agencies responsible for setting safety standards may be influenced by industry interests, a phenomenon known as regulatory capture.
- Suppression of Science: Critical research findings may be ignored or underreported, limiting public awareness.
Outdated Safety Guidelines
- Thermal Focus: Current guidelines only consider thermal effects, ignoring non-thermal biological impacts demonstrated by recent studies.
- Lack of Updates: Safety standards have not been significantly revised in over two decades, despite advances in technology and scientific understanding.
- Public Misinformation: The notion that cell phone radiation is entirely safe has been perpetuated, leading to complacency.
The Public’s Right to Know
Transparency and Accountability
- Informed Decisions: People have the right to know about potential risks to make informed choices about their health.
- Policy Changes: Updated safety guidelines are needed to reflect current scientific evidence and protect public health.
- Advocacy: Public pressure can encourage regulatory agencies to reevaluate standards and prioritize safety over industry interests.
Taking Action: Protecting Yourself and Others
Personal Precautions
- Limit Exposure:
- Use speakerphone or wired headsets to keep the phone away from your head.
- Text instead of calling when possible.
- Avoid Body Contact:
- Do not carry your phone in pockets close to your body.
- Use a bag or purse to carry your phone.
- Turn Off Wireless Functions:
- Disable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when not in use.
- Use airplane mode when you don’t need connectivity.
- Protect Children:
- Limit children’s use of cell phones and wireless devices.
- Educate them about safe usage practices.
Challenging the Thermal-Only View:
Imagine if, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, authorities insisted that the Earth is the center of the universe. Such a refusal to accept scientific truth would seem absurd today. Yet, a similar scenario is unfolding in the realm of radiofrequency (RF) radiation safety guidelines. Despite decades of research demonstrating that RF radiation can have biological effects beyond mere heating, current regulations remain anchored to the outdated thermal-only perspective. This oversight isn’t just a scientific misstep—it’s a public health concern that demands immediate attention.
The Outdated Thermal Hypothesis
For years, the prevailing assumption has been that RF radiation can only cause harm through thermal effects—by heating tissues to a point where damage occurs. This “thermal hypothesis” suggests that if exposure levels are kept below thresholds that cause significant heating, then no adverse health effects will ensue. While this made sense based on early research, it fails to account for a growing body of evidence demonstrating non-thermal biological effects.
Decades of Research Indicate Non-Thermal Effects
Over 30 Years of Scientific Studies
Over the past three decades, more than 2,500 studies have investigated the effects of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) on biological systems. Researchers like Dr. Henry Lai, Professor Emeritus at the University of Washington, have contributed significantly to this field. Their findings challenge the thermal-only view, showing that EMFs can induce biological changes at exposure levels well below those that cause heating.
Key Findings
- Oxidative Stress: Approximately 89% of studies since 1997 reported significant oxidative effects from RF radiation exposure. Oxidative stress can lead to cellular damage and is linked to various diseases.
- Genetic Effects: Around 70% of studies observed genetic alterations, including DNA damage and changes in gene expression, which could have long-term health implications.
- Neurological Effects: About 77% of research found significant impacts on neurological function, raising concerns about cognitive and behavioral changes.
- Reproductive Effects: Approximately 83% of studies reported effects on reproduction and development, suggesting potential risks to fertility and fetal development.
Medical Advancements Highlight Non-Thermal Effects
Innovative Cancer Treatments
Recent advancements in medical science have harnessed non-thermal effects of RF radiation for therapeutic purposes. Treatments like TheraBionic use specific radio frequencies to target cancer cells without relying on heat. These therapies work by interfering with cellular signaling pathways, leading to cancer cell death while sparing healthy tissue.
Implications for Safety Guidelines
If medical treatments can utilize non-thermal RF radiation to produce biological effects, it stands to reason that similar exposures in everyday life could also have unintended consequences. This challenges the notion that only thermal effects are relevant for safety considerations.
The Absurdity of Ignoring Non-Thermal Effects
An Outdated Perspective in a Modern World
Clinging to the thermal-only hypothesis in light of overwhelming evidence is akin to denying well-established scientific facts. With the proliferation of wireless technologies—smartphones, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth devices—the public is exposed to RF radiation more than ever before. Ignoring non-thermal effects under these circumstances is not just outdated; it’s irresponsible.
The Precautionary Principle
The precautionary principle suggests that in the face of scientific uncertainty and potential risks, protective measures should be taken to prevent harm. Given the significant evidence of non-thermal biological effects, it’s prudent to reevaluate safety guidelines to protect public health.
Understanding the Mechanisms of Non-Thermal Effects
How EMFs Interact with Biological Systems
Non-thermal effects occur without a significant rise in temperature. Proposed mechanisms include:
- Cellular Signaling Disruption: EMFs may interfere with the communication between cells, altering normal biological functions.
- Voltage-Gated Calcium Channels Activation: EMFs can affect these channels in cell membranes, leading to an influx of calcium ions and subsequent cellular changes.
- Oxidative Stress Induction: EMFs may increase the production of reactive oxygen species, leading to cellular damage.
Cumulative and Individual Variability
- Cumulative Exposure: Prolonged or repeated exposure to low levels of RF radiation might lead to cumulative biological effects over time.
- Individual Sensitivity: Genetic factors, age, and health conditions can influence how individuals respond to EMF exposure, with some people being more susceptible than others.
The Need to Update Safety Guidelines
Inadequacies of Current Regulations
Current safety standards primarily protect against immediate thermal damage, not long-term non-thermal effects. This leaves a significant gap in public health protection.
Calls from the Scientific Community
Scientists and health experts are urging regulatory bodies to:
- Reevaluate Exposure Limits: Incorporate non-thermal effects into safety standards.
- Promote Independent Research: Fund studies to further understand the mechanisms and health implications of non-thermal effects.
- Increase Public Awareness: Educate the public about potential risks and how to mitigate them.
