Wireless radiation risks have become one of the most pressing public health issues of our time. Yet, while scientific evidence mounts, the regulatory framework meant to protect the American people remains hopelessly outdated. In this article, we will delve into the issue from multiple angles to help voters understand why it matters, and how the Biden-Harris administration has failed to act.
A Silent Public Health Crisis
For decades, Americans have trusted that the devices they use daily—like cell phones and Wi-Fi routers—are safe because they have been regulated by the government. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have long been considered authorities on safety standards. However, recent legal and scientific developments have brought to light glaring faults in these safety regulations, faults that the Biden-Harris administration has failed to address.
The 1996 standards established by the FCC to regulate exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation were created during a different technological era—before the age of smartphones and Wi-Fi networks. Yet, despite repeated calls for updates from both scientists and the judiciary, these safety guidelines have not been revised. Worse still, the current administration ended vital cancer research that was shedding light on the real dangers of wireless radiation.
Candidate Stances: Know Where They Stand
Understanding where candidates stand on RF-EMF safety and research is vital for voters concerned about public health and technological advancement. Here’s how the key candidates compare:
Kamala Harris
Despite the 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the FCC had failed to properly justify maintaining outdated RF radiation exposure guidelines, the Biden-Harris administration has allowed these antiquated standards to persist. Rather than enforcing the court’s mandate to reassess these guidelines in light of new scientific evidence, the administration has remained passive, effectively allowing the FCC to continue neglecting public health.
What’s worse, under Vice President Kamala Harris, the National Toxicology Program (NTP)—which conducted one of the most comprehensive studies linking RF radiation to cancer—was allowed to run out of funding. This halted further research that could have provided even more concrete evidence that the current FCC guidelines fail to protect the public, especially vulnerable populations like children.
In short, Harris has not made any effort to safeguard public health from a threat that has been clearly recognized by the courts. Her inaction has left millions, including children, exposed to potential risks from RF radiation, even as scientific and legal findings demand urgent reform.
Voting for Harris in 2024 is not just a vote for corporate interests—it’s a vote that could directly impact the public’s health, putting millions at risk of developing brain tumors and other serious conditions.
Donald Trump
During his first term as president, Donald Trump’s FCC appointees maintained the status quo, favoring corporate interests in the rollout of 5G technology. One of his key appointees, Ajit Pai, a former Verizon lawyer, was criticized for not prioritizing public health in updating RF radiation safety standards. This approach allowed the telecommunications industry to push forward without proper oversight, perpetuating outdated safety guidelines set in 1996, long before today’s wireless technology boom.
However, in his current campaign, Trump has acknowledged his past mistakes. Through discussions with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump has expressed a commitment to rectifying these oversights. Both figures have recognized the long-standing issue of regulatory capture at the FCC, where the agency has been influenced by the industries it is supposed to regulate. This capture has led to decades of inaction on RF radiation safety standards despite growing scientific evidence linking RF exposure to cancer, neurological disorders, and other health risks.
In this campaign, Trump has vowed to:
- Restore funding for the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) research on RF radiation, which was halted during the Biden administration despite findings linking RF radiation to cancer.
- Overhaul the FCC, breaking the stronghold of the telecommunications industry and ensuring that public health is a priority.
- Update RF safety standards to reflect the latest scientific evidence on both thermal and non-thermal effects of RF radiation.
With RFK Jr.’s expertise and relentless advocacy in holding regulatory agencies accountable, Trump sees an opportunity for real change. A Trump-Kennedy partnership would focus on reforming the FCC, ensuring that it serves public health rather than corporate profits. Trump’s promise not to repeat the mistakes of his first term signals a potential shift in the government’s approach to RF radiation safety, offering hope for long-overdue reform in 2024.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
In stark contrast to Harris, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has been a tireless advocate for RF radiation safety. His 2021 lawsuit against the FCC resulted in a historic court ruling that the agency had “failed to justify” its outdated safety standards. Kennedy has long pushed for a complete overhaul of these guidelines, emphasizing the need for regulatory bodies to recognize the dangers posed by non-thermal RF radiation exposure.
Kennedy’s stance is firmly rooted in science. He has pointed to major studies, including the NTP’s decade-long investigation, which found increased rates of brain and heart tumors in animals exposed to cell phone radiation. Kennedy has also criticized the FCC’s cozy relationship with the telecommunications industry, calling for independent research and stricter oversight to protect the public from the dangers of wireless radiation.
A vote for Kennedy in 2024 is a vote for updated safety guidelines and a government that prioritizes public health over corporate profits.
RFK Jr.’s Landmark FCC Lawsuit: A Turning Point
The 2021 Court Ruling Against the FCC
A key turning point in this debate came in 2021, when Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust won a lawsuit against the FCC. The lawsuit accused the FCC of failing to update its safety guidelines in light of new scientific evidence. The U.S. Court of Appeals agreed, ruling that the FCC had indeed failed to provide a reasoned explanation for why it chose to retain outdated testing procedures for determining compliance with RF radiation limits.
Judge Patricia Ann Millett, who presided over the case, pointed out how the FCC’s reliance on outdated FDA research was not credible. She highlighted that the FDA’s recommendations still referenced cell phone holsters—an accessory hardly used today—as evidence of the outdated nature of these safety standards.
Court-Ordered Actions: What the FCC Must Do
The court ordered the FCC to address several key areas:
- Provide a reasoned explanation for its decision to retain its current testing procedures.
- Address the impacts of RF radiation on children, the health implications of long-term exposure, the ubiquity of wireless devices, and the technological developments since the guidelines were last updated.
- Review the environmental impacts of RF radiation on wildlife and nature.
This ruling represented a significant win for public health, yet the Biden-Harris administration has failed to act on these orders.
Why the Biden-Harris Administration Failed to Act
Cancelling the World’s Most Important Cancer Research
After the landmark ruling in 2021, there was a brief hope that the administration would take the necessary steps to protect Americans. However, instead of complying with the court’s ruling and updating safety guidelines, the Biden-Harris administration made the inexplicable decision to cancel critical cancer research conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP).
The NTP study had already produced alarming results—showing clear evidence that RF radiation could cause cancer in rats, including malignant brain tumors. This was also confirmed by the Ramazzini Institute in Italy, which conducted a parallel study that similarly linked RF radiation to cancer. These two studies were the largest rat studies ever conducted in cancer research, and both found undeniable evidence of harm. Yet, these vital research initiatives were abruptly defunded and shelved.
Regulatory Capture and the Influence of Corporate Interests
The failure to act is not an issue of a lack of scientific evidence—the evidence is overwhelming. The real issue is that regulatory bodies, such as the FCC, have been captured by corporate interests. Under the Obama-Biden administration, Tom Wheeler, a former lobbyist for the telecommunications industry, was appointed to head the FCC. This was a clear example of regulatory capture, and it set the tone for how the FCC would continue to handle wireless radiation concerns.
The Biden-Harris administration, despite having a court mandate to update safety guidelines, continued to turn a blind eye to the evidence, ultimately protecting industry profits over public health.
The Dangers of Wireless Radiation: What the Science Says
Non-Thermal Biological Effects: More Than Just Heat
One of the biggest misconceptions about wireless radiation is that it only poses a risk if it heats body tissues. This is the basis of the FCC’s outdated Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limits, which focus solely on thermal effects. However, modern science has shown that RF radiation has significant non-thermal biological effects that can lead to a host of health problems.
DNA Damage and Oxidative Stress
Studies have found that exposure to RF radiation can cause breaks in DNA strands, leading to mutations that can result in cancer over time. Additionally, RF radiation exposure has been linked to increased oxidative stress, which contributes to premature aging, inflammation, and cancer.
Hormonal Disruption and Reproductive Health
RF radiation has also been shown to interfere with the body’s endocrine system, leading to hormonal imbalances. This is especially concerning for children and teenagers, whose bodies are still developing. For boys, carrying a phone in their front pocket has been shown to impact sperm count and motility, while for girls, radiation exposure near the abdomen may interfere with ovarian function, potentially leading to fertility issues later in life.
Why Children Are Particularly Vulnerable
Increased Absorption Rates
Children absorb RF radiation at a higher rate than adults. Their thinner skulls and still-developing brains make them more susceptible to the deeper penetration of electromagnetic waves. A 2019 study by the American Academy of Pediatrics found that children absorb two to three times more radiation from the same device compared to adults.
Increased Lifetime Exposure
The younger a child is when they start using a cell phone, the greater their cumulative exposure to RF radiation over their lifetime. This means that, unless action is taken to reduce exposure, today’s children are on track to face significantly higher health risks compared to previous generations.
Major Studies Supporting the Health Risks of RF Radiation
There is a significant body of research indicating potential health risks associated with cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. This includes major studies like the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai. These studies collectively point towards an increased health risk from cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation and the absurdity in dismissing potential risks.
It is becoming clear that the misclassification of RF radiation risk is responsible for holding back life-saving medical interventions. A recent review stated, “Existent literature points toward a yet untapped therapeutic potential of RF-EMF treatment which might aid in damaging cancer cells through bioelectrical and electromechanical molecular mechanisms while minimizing adverse effects on healthy tissue cells.”
This may be the most crucial issue of our modern era; advancements in RF radiation research show biological interactions beyond thermal effects. For example, the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment, which employs RF radiation at power levels up to 1000 times lower than those emitted by cell phones, effectively treats inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions at the cellular or molecular level. This includes resonance effects, disruption of cellular signaling, and potential modulation of the immune system. This proves the traditional view that non-ionizing cell phone radiation is biologically inert except for its heating properties— is wrong. Therefore, the outdated FCC guidelines must be updated, and funding for the NTP cancer research halted under Biden-Harris must be restarted to protect public health.
Devra Davis’ Statement on Government Inaction
Devra Davis, PhD, MPH, President of the Environmental Health Trust, has been outspoken on the implications of the government’s decision to stop funding research on cell phone radiation. Dr. Davis stated:
“The government’s decision to stop funding research on cell phone radiation is consistent with the Chinese proverb ‘If you don’t want to know, don’t ask.’ The US government has a variation of that in policy of, ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’. If you don’t want to know whether cell tower radiation is having a biological impact, stop doing the research!
The United States has been asleep at the switch and is missing a very important opportunity to provide protection to public health and the environment.
In fact, the U.S. government’s own studies showed cancer and DNA damage from cell phone radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure.
Infertility clinics ask men what their habits are with respect to cell phones and other wireless devices. They tell them to take these phones off their bodies and out of their pockets because there is evidence with human sperm, of a dose-response relationship, where the greater the exposure, the lower the sperm count, and the poorer the sperm quality. This has been repeatedly shown in studies with human sperm done under controlled conditions, as well as cross-sectional studies. We think it’s time for the USA to support a massive research and training program. Monitoring and oversight for compliance is also needed.
In France, such a program exists on a very small scale. But unlike the United States, which relies only on testing of a single phone before it’s marketed, the French government monitors cell phone radiation emissions after they are marketed. Several years ago when they tested hundreds of cellphones, they found that nine out of every 10 phones tested exceeded the EU’s outdated radiation limits. Since then, 46 cell phone models have been pulled or had software updates from the market. Most recently, the French government ordered the Apple 12 phone not to be sold. And, Apple responded saying that the excessive amounts of radiation from their phones could be reduced by a simple software fix which they instituted within two weeks of receiving this notice from the French government.”
The updated 2024 NTP factsheet stating no additional research is planned by the NTP also detailed the cancer and DNA findings from its studies, stating:
Did NTP find health effects other than cancer?
“NTP found lower body weights among newborn rats and their mothers, especially when exposed to high levels of RFR during pregnancy and lactation, yet these animals grew to normal size. They also found that RFR exposure was associated with an increase in DNA damage. DNA damage, if not repaired, can potentially lead to tumors. Specifically, they found RFR exposure was linked with significant increases in DNA damage in the frontal cortex of the brain in male mice, the blood cells of female mice, and the hippocampus of male rats.”
What did the studies find?
“In studies of high levels of RFR, like that used in 2G and 3G cellphones, NTP found:
- Clear evidence of an association with tumors in the hearts of male rats. The tumors were malignant schwannomas.
- Some evidence of an association with tumors in the brains of male rats. The tumors were malignant gliomas.
- Some evidence of an association with tumors in the adrenal glands of male rats. The tumors were benign, malignant, or complex combined pheochromocytoma.”
Further NIEHS researchers, along with researchers of the Italian Ramazzini Institute, just published a paper titled “Genetic profiling of rat gliomas and cardiac schwannomas from life-time radiofrequency radiation exposure study using a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel” published in PLOS ONE, which found that the gliomas and cardiac schwannomas in rats resulting from lifetime exposure to low-dose far-field RF radiation (the Ramazzini study mimicking cell tower/base station exposures) are morphologically similar to low-grade human gliomas and that about 25% of the mutations seen in these tumors have corresponding alterations in homologs of human cancer genes.
“The U.S. government needs to step up and address this issue with a comprehensive research, oversight, and monitoring program instead of ceasing all research!”
The Telecommunications Act of 1996: A Barrier to Public Health
One of the biggest barriers to meaningful action on wireless radiation has been the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Under this act, local governments are prohibited from considering health effects when making decisions about cell tower placement. This effectively takes away the rights of communities to protect themselves from potentially harmful radiation, forcing them to accept the construction of cell towers near schools, homes, and playgrounds.
This has to stop. People have the right to protect themselves and their families from proven health risks, yet they are being silenced by legislation that prioritizes corporate profits over public welfare.
A Call to Action: What Needs to Change
Update Safety Guidelines
The FCC must comply with the 2021 court ruling and update its safety guidelines to reflect modern science. This includes accounting for non-thermal biological effects and ensuring that children and vulnerable populations are adequately protected.
Restart and Fund Research
The Biden-Harris administration must restore funding to the National Toxicology Program and support independent research into the health effects of RF radiation. We cannot afford to ignore the growing body of evidence linking RF radiation to cancer and other serious health issues.
End Corporate Influence
Regulatory agencies like the FCC must operate independently, without undue influence from the telecommunications industry. This means appointing leaders who are committed to public health, not industry profits.
The Time for Change Is Now
This issue is no longer about science—the science is clear. The risks of wireless radiation are well-documented, and continuing to ignore them is a matter of policy failure. The Biden-Harris administration has had opportunities to act, yet it has repeatedly chosen to side with corporate interests over the health of the American people.
Your vote matters. If we are to protect our children, our environment, and ourselves from the growing threat of electrosmog and RF radiation, we need to elect leaders who will prioritize public health. Leaders who will hold regulatory agencies accountable, ensure that safety guidelines are based on current science, and act to mitigate the damage already done.
The time for complacency is over. This election, make your vote count—vote for the health of our families and the future of our nation.
