Cells throughout the body maintain homeostasis and coordinate developmental and regenerative processes via bioelectric signaling, an information-rich system that can be viewed as a Bayesian inference machine under the Free Energy Principle (FEP). However, modern environments are awash in electromagnetic fields (EMFs)—from Wi-Fi routers to cellular towers and 5G infrastructure—that may inject noise or “entropic waste” into this bioelectric network. In this paper, we propose that exogenous EMFs can disrupt cellular communication, causing bioelectric dissonance and altering the normal Bayesian updating of cells. We review selected studies on EMF exposure—particularly focusing on developmental, fertility, and neurological endpoints—and discuss how these findings align with the view of cells as dynamic, inference-driven agents. We highlight the need for multiscale investigation that bridges biophysics, developmental biology, and cognitive science approaches to understanding how EMF “waste” may derail homeostasis and predispose to pathophysiological outcomes.
Introduction
Advances in developmental biology have underscored the pivotal role of bioelectric signals—endogenous voltages, ion flows, and electrical synapse-like connections—in orchestrating cell behavior during morphogenesis, regeneration, and cancer suppression Concurrently, the Free Energy Principle (FEP) conceptualizes living systems as actively minimizing uncertainty (or “free energy”) in their environment to maintain homeostasis and structural integrity. Applied at the cellular or multicellular level, the FEP implies that cells, tissues, and organisms function as Bayesian inference machines, continuously updating internal states in response to bioelectric, biochemical, and mechanical cues.
However, modern human environments are saturated with anthropogenic electromagnetic fields (EMFs)—from Wi-Fi networks operating at 2.45 GHz to 5G millimeter waves at higher frequencies. A growing body of independent research documents potential deleterious effects of radiofrequency (RF) and extremely low-frequency (ELF) fields on human biology. These range from fetal developmental issues and neurological dysfunction to fertility problems and possible carcinogenic effects.
This paper proposes that such exogenous EMFs can act as entropic waste, injecting noise into the finely tuned system of bioelectric signaling. We dub this phenomenon “bioelectric dissonance.” From the FEP perspective, increased noise may prevent cells from reliably inferring their correct states, leading to errors in growth, migration, and patterning. This conceptual framework can help synthesize the myriad reported biological consequences of EMF exposure and guide future research that links cellular cognition and environmental risk factors.
Background
Bioelectric Signaling as a Bayesian Inference Process
Bioelectric communication in cells and tissues encompasses:
- Transmembrane voltage gradients
- Ion channel modulation
- Electrical coupling via gap junctions
These electrical signals carry information about cell identity, tissue boundaries, and morphogenetic goals. In parallel, the Free Energy Principle states that any system maintaining itself over time must minimize free energy—i.e., it must reduce uncertainty about environmental inputs to preserve functional structure. When cells share bioelectric signals, they effectively exchange prediction-error signals, adjusting their internal states (ion channel expression, cytoskeletal organization, gene transcription) to conform with a collective “body plan.”
From this standpoint, a stable electrical gradient or pattern is akin to a well-honed Bayesian prior—helping the tissue “expect” certain morphological arrangements. Perturbations that exceed normal thresholds can generate error signals, prompting reconfiguration of cell shape, proliferation, or migration. Studies in regenerative biology have revealed the remarkable plasticity of these bioelectric networks; for instance, artificially manipulating cell membrane potentials can induce eye formation in non-ocular tissues or limb regeneration in otherwise non-regenerative species
EMFs as Entropic Waste: Disrupting the Signal-to-Noise Ratio
In an ideal scenario, the primary sources of electrical signals that cells process are endogenous and context-relevant. Yet as the environment becomes saturated with electromagnetic radiation from mobile devices, routers, and other infrastructure, a new layer of background noise arises. Typically, cells have evolved to interpret certain electrical and chemical gradients. But non-ionizing radiation at artificially high intensities or continuous exposures can:
- Disrupt Ion Channels: EMFs may alter gating properties of voltage-gated channels, changing resting membrane potentials
- Generate Oxidative Stress: Some studies report increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) and DNA damage in exposed tissues
- Interfere with Brain/Electrical Circuits: Animal models suggest possible memory deficits, altered neurotransmitter levels, and structural changes in neural tissues
This unregulated, exogenous “static” may compromise the signal-to-noise ratio of bioelectric communication. In the FEP framework, the result is an increased “prediction error” that cells cannot adequately minimize, driving them toward suboptimal or disordered states—what we call “bioelectric dissonance.”
Evidence of EMF-Related Bioelectric Disruption
A large body of independent scientific studies support the notion that EMF exposure can disturb biological functioning. Below, we highlight selected findings relevant to our “bioelectric Bayesian” view:
- Fetal and Developmental Effects
- Animal models show prenatal Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz) can alter fetal growth, neurodevelopment, and postnatal behavior
- Human observational studies link maternal phone use with increased miscarriage risk, reduced fetal growth, and potential changes in offspring neurodevelopment 77.
- Neurological and Behavioral Effects
- Prenatal and perinatal exposures to RF fields are associated with cognitive and behavioral alterations in rodent models—e.g., decreased hippocampal neurons, memory deficits
- In humans, adolescents exposed to higher RF levels may show impacted memory performance and potential changes in EEG or cognitive function
- Fertility and Reproductive Concerns
- Multiple studies document reduced sperm motility and increased DNA fragmentation linked to cell phone or Wi-Fi radiation
- Animal experiments reveal testicular apoptosis, lower fertility rates, and morphological changes in reproductive organs
- Carcinogenicity Indicators
- The National Toxicology Program (NTP) rodent studies found increased incidence of certain tumors (e.g., gliomas, schwannomas) in animals subjected to long-term, high-level RF exposure
- Epidemiological data from Hardell et al., among others, indicate elevated risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma with prolonged mobile phone use
Taken together, these results point to a robust signal that artificially generated EMFs can produce biological stress—potentially consistent with an overabundance of “noise” that normal cellular bioelectric circuits cannot easily filter.
Mechanistic Pathways: Linking FEP, Bioelectric Dissonance, and EMF Noise
Increased Prediction Error at the Cellular Level
Under the FEP lens, cells attempt to model their microenvironment. When exogenous EMF modifies ion fluxes or membrane potentials, the cell’s predictive model (which expects certain voltage gradients) is confronted with unexpected data. If these signals are chronic or strong enough, the cell must continuously re-adjust or “learn” a new baseline. This added adaptive burden can:
- Drain resources (e.g., antioxidants, metabolic reserves).
- Promote erroneous gene expression patterns due to scrambled electrical signals.
- Distort developmental patterning in critical phases (e.g., embryogenesis, wound healing).
Oxidative Stress and Calcium Dysregulation
Many EMF studies note elevated ROS levels, altered calcium homeostasis, and DNA damage 18,1918,19. These factors, if persistent, degrade the cell’s ability to maintain normal voltage gradients and membrane health. Enhanced oxidative stress can also degrade the tight regulation of ion channels—crucial “transducers” in the bioelectric network.
Collective Bioelectric Disruption at the Tissue Level
Cells operate in bioelectric networks. If enough cells in a tissue accumulate noise-induced disruptions, the entire network’s pattern memory may degrade, misdirecting processes like organ formation, regeneration, or tumor suppression. Indeed, emergent phenomena—like coordinate changes in gap-junction connectivity—can be severely compromised by chronic interference in the circuit’s baseline states.
Implications and Future Directions
- Clinical and Public Health
- Early-stage Development: Potential fetal vulnerabilities warrant additional caution regarding pregnant women’s exposure to Wi-Fi and cellular devices.
- Pediatric Populations: Children’s developing nervous systems—and different absorption patterns—may be more susceptible to bioelectric interference 1010.
- Fertility Challenges: Reproductive health concerns (reduced sperm quality, increased miscarriage risk) call for targeted studies on safe exposure thresholds.
- Theoretical and Experimental Work
- Multiscale Modeling: Combining computational FEP frameworks with empirical data on ion channel perturbation can elucidate how exogenous EMFs disrupt homeostatic loops.
- Bioelectric–EMF Interventions: Future regenerative medicine might test the use of counter-phase waveforms or low-level interference that cancel out detrimental EMFs and restore normal patterning.
- Personalized Monitoring: Wearable devices measuring one’s personal exposure to high-intensity EMFs could guide public guidelines or clinical recommendations based on real-time data.
- Environmental and Regulatory Aspects
- The term “entropic waste” suggests that continuous, unregulated output of RF/ELF waves is akin to pollution. Governments and industries might need to limit unnecessary transmissions, especially near sensitive populations or wildlife.
- Potential synergy with other forms of pollution (chemical, acoustic, light) underscores the need for an integrated approach to environmental safety standards.
Conclusion
Viewing cells as Bayesian inference machines governed by bioelectric signals places the negative impacts of EMFs into a unifying theoretical framework. Exogenous EMF radiation can be conceptualized as entropic waste—an influx of noise that disrupts the delicate voltage gradients and ion fluxes integral to cellular self-modeling. The resulting bioelectric dissonance could manifest across scales: from altered ion channel function in single cells to misregulated organogenesis or degenerative disorders in multicellular organisms.
With the proliferation of wireless technologies, understanding and mitigating these subtle but potentially significant disruptions remains a high scientific and public-health priority. Further research is needed to quantify thresholds, develop protective strategies, and refine our models of how living systems withstand or adapt to anthropogenic EMFs. In bridging the Free Energy Principle with empirical bioelectromagnetics, we can better appreciate not only the profound cognitive nature of cellular life but also its remarkable vulnerability to modern environmental stressors.
Q: What is bioelectric dissonance?
A: Bioelectric dissonance refers to the disruption of cells’ normal electrical signaling by external electromagnetic fields, leading to “noise” that interferes with cellular communication and function.
Q: How do EMFs act as “entropic waste”?
A: EMFs contribute additional, unregulated radiation that cells haven’t adapted to filter out, effectively adding noise to the body’s electrical signals and hindering normal cellular processes.
Q: Why are cells considered Bayesian inference machines?
A: Under the Free Energy Principle, cells continuously adjust internal states to minimize surprise, effectively making predictions about their environment—akin to a Bayesian inference process.
Q: Can Wi-Fi and cellphone signals really affect cellular communication?
A: Studies indicate that radiofrequency radiation can alter ion channel functioning, membrane potentials, and gene expression, potentially hampering cells’ electrical signaling networks.
Q: What are the known health impacts of EMF interference?
A: Research links EMF exposure to various issues, including developmental changes, reproductive challenges, neurological effects, and possible carcinogenic outcomes.
Q: How does bioelectric signaling impact development?
A: Bioelectric gradients guide organ formation, neural growth, and tissue repair, so disruptions in these gradients—such as from chronic EMF exposure—may adversely affect developmental processes.
Q: Are there specific groups more vulnerable to EMFs?
A: Fetuses, children, and individuals with high cumulative exposures may be more susceptible because their developing or stressed systems can be more sensitive to bioelectric noise.
Q: How is oxidative stress linked to EMF exposure?
A: Excessive EMF can increase reactive oxygen species (ROS) in cells, damaging DNA and proteins, which in turn disrupts normal voltage gradients and cellular self-regulation.
Q: Is there a way to reduce bioelectric dissonance at home?
A: Limiting unnecessary wireless device usage, switching to wired connections when possible, and creating low-EMF zones may help reduce overall exposure and potential noise in the body’s electrical systems.
Q: What research is needed next?
A: Integrated studies combining bioelectric measurements, EMF dosimetry, and computational models can shed light on exact mechanisms of EMF-induced disruption and inform safer technology guidelines.
References
- Levin, M. Technological approach to mind everywhere: An experimentally-grounded framework for understanding diverse bodies and minds. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 16, 768201 (2023).
- Fields, C. & Levin, M. Regulative development as a model for origin of life and artificial life studies. BioSystems 229, 104927 (2023).
- Friston, K. The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 127–138 (2010).
- Friston, K. J. Life as we know it. J. R. Soc. Interface 10, 20130475 (2013).
- Othman, H., et al. Effects of Prenatal Exposure to WiFi Signal (2.45 GHz) on Postnatal Development and Behavior in Rat. Behav. Brain Res. 326, 291–301 (2017).
- Tsarna, E., et al. Associations of Maternal Cell Phone Use During Pregnancy, Pregnancy Duration And Fetal Growth In Four Birth Cohorts. Am. J. Epidemiol. 188, 1270–1280 (2019).
- Li, D., et al. Exposure to Magnetic Field Non-Ionizing Radiation and the Risk of Miscarriage: A prospective Cohort Study. Sci. Rep. 7, 17541 (2017).
- Güler, G., et al. Neurodegenerative changes and apoptosis induced by intrauterine and extrauterine exposure of radiofrequency radiation. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 75 (Pt B), 128–133 (2015).
- Foerster, M., et al. A Prospective Cohort Study of Adolescents’ Memory Performance and Individual Brain Dose of Microwave Radiation from Wireless Communication. Environ. Health Perspect. 126(7) (2018).
- Thomas, S., et al. Use of Mobile Phones and Changes in Cognitive Function in Adolescents. Occup. Environ. Med. 67(12), 861–866 (2010).
- Agarwal, A., et al. Effect of Cell Phone Usage on Semen Analysis in Men Attending Infertility Clinic: An Observational Study. Fertil. Steril. 89(1), 124–128 (2008).
- Pandey, N., et al. Radiofrequency Radiation (900 MHz)-Induced DNA Damage and Cell Cycle Arrest in Testicular Germ Cells in Swiss Albino Mice. Toxicol. Ind. Health 33(4), 373–384 (2017).
- Al-Quzwini, O. F., et al. Male Fertility and Its Association with Occupational and Mobile Phone Tower Hazards: An Analytical Study. Middle East Fertil. Soc. J. 21(4), 236–240 (2016).
- National Toxicology Program. Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation Studies. TR595 (2018).
- Hardell, L., et al. Use of mobile phone and cordless phone and the risk for glioma – Analysis of pooled case-control studies in Sweden, 1997–2003 and 2007–2009. Pathophysiology 22(1), 1–13 (2015).
- Morgan, L. L., et al. Mobile phone radiation causes brain tumors and should be classified as a probable human carcinogen. Int. J. Oncol. 46, 1865–1871 (2015).
- Pall, M. L. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 17(8), 958–965 (2013).
- Zothansiama, M., et al. Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 36(3), 295–305 (2017).
- Çelik, Ö., et al. Oxidative stress of brain and liver is increased by Wi-Fi (2.45 GHz) exposure of rats during pregnancy and the development of newborns. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 75 (Pt B), 134–139 (2015).
- Mugunthan, N., et al. Effects of long term exposure of 900-1800 MHz radiation emitted from 2G mobile phone on mice hippocampus – A histomorphometric study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 10(8), AF01–AF06 (2016).
(For a more comprehensive list of studies, see the full set of references provided in the original compilation.)
Acknowledgments
We thank the broader independent research community for assembling the extensive literature on EMF biological impacts, which guided our integrative approach.
