A Call to Action for President Trump – Two Campaign Promises
1) Fix Biden’s NTP Funding Error! 2) Update FCC Guidelines!
President Trump, it’s time to take up RFK Jr.’s battles for the health of the American people and reverse the Biden regime’s choice to halt NTP research over funding constraints. The potential risks associated with electromagnetic radiation, “entropic waste,” must be thoroughly investigated. Moreover, the advancements in bioelectric medicine from understanding these risks will lead to groundbreaking treatments and a new era in healthcare by embracing the importance of bioelectricity in human health.
The health and safety of the American people should always be a priority. By acknowledging and addressing these issues, you can protect public health and pave the way for innovative medical treatments that harness the power of bioelectricity.
Let’s stand together for a healthier future, informed by science and guided by the commitment to safeguarding our citizens. President Trump, we urge you to champion this cause and continue putting the American people first.
Give RFK Jr. a Hand! Update FCC Guidelines
In a landmark case, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) faced a lawsuit filed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) challenging the FCC’s outdated safety guidelines on cell phone radiation. Here are the key facts:
Lawsuit Filed: Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) sued the FCC in 2020, claiming that the commission’s guidelines for exposure to cell phone radiation, established in 1996, were outdated and failed to reflect current scientific understanding and research on the health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation.
Court Ruling: In August 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. The court found that the FCC had not adequately explained why its 1996 guidelines were sufficient to protect against the harmful effects of exposure to RF radiation, especially considering the more recent studies and scientific evidence presented by the plaintiffs.
Failure to Address Non-Cancer Risks: The court specifically criticized the FCC for failing to address the non-cancer health effects of RF radiation, including evidence related to reproductive health, neurological impacts, and effects on children.
Directive to Reevaluate Guidelines: The court ordered the FCC to provide a reasoned explanation for its determination that the 1996 guidelines adequately protect against the adverse health effects of RF radiation unrelated to cancer, or to reevaluate its guidelines in light of the current scientific evidence.
Significance: This ruling was significant as it acknowledged the potential inadequacy of existing RF radiation exposure limits and underscored the need for regulatory agencies to stay current with scientific research. It marked a victory for advocates of stricter safety standards and highlighted the ongoing debate about the health effects of modern wireless technology.
For more detailed information, you can refer to the court’s decision and the Environmental Health Trust’s summaries and press releases regarding the case.
Fix Biden’s NTP Blunder!
Here are the key facts regarding the National Toxicology Program (NTP) halting further cell phone radiation cancer studies after finding clear evidence, along with the confirmation of NTP results by Ramazzini Institute (RI) studies:
NTP Study Findings
- NTP Study: The National Toxicology Program, part of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, conducted a comprehensive study on the health effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation from cell phones.
- Study Results: Released in 2018, the NTP study found “clear evidence” that high levels of RF radiation could cause cancer in rats. Specifically, male rats exposed to RF radiation developed malignant schwannomas (a type of nerve tumor) in the heart and brain gliomas (a type of brain tumor).
- Study Scope: The study was one of the largest and most expensive animal studies on RF radiation, involving over 3,000 rodents and costing approximately $30 million.
Halting Further Studies
- Halt in Further Studies Under Biden: Despite these significant findings, the NTP decided to halt further studies on RF radiation. The decision, disclosed quietly, was attributed to the high costs and technical challenges of continuing the research. This move has sparked significant debate among scientists and health advocates who argue that more research is necessary to fully understand the long-term health effects of RF radiation on humans.
- Public Reaction: The cessation of NTP research was met with shock and disappointment from various quarters, including scientists, health advocates, and concerned citizens, who argue that this move undermines public health by reducing the scientific understanding of RFR’s effects at a time when such knowledge is most needed.
Ramazzini Institute (RI) Confirmation
- RI Study: The Ramazzini Institute in Italy conducted a separate large-scale animal study to investigate the effects of RF radiation. Their research focused on lower levels of exposure, comparable to what humans might experience from cell towers.
- RI Results: Published in 2018, the RI study found that male rats exposed to RF radiation also developed malignant schwannomas of the heart, consistent with the NTP study findings. Additionally, the RI study observed increased incidences of brain and adrenal gland tumors in the exposed rats.
- Study Significance: The RI study corroborated the NTP’s findings, providing further evidence that RF radiation could be carcinogenic. The parallel results from two independent studies strengthened the argument for re-evaluating current safety guidelines for RF radiation exposure.
Implications
- Safety Guidelines: These findings have prompted calls for updated safety standards and guidelines for RF radiation exposure, given that current guidelines are based on outdated assumptions and may not adequately protect public health.
- Public Health Concerns: The studies highlight the potential risks associated with long-term exposure to RF radiation from cell phones and other wireless devices, emphasizing the need for more research and precautionary measures to mitigate these risks.
- Biden Administration: Despite the growing body of evidence, the Biden administration decided to halt funding to the NTP’s ongoing research on RFR, diverting funds to other areas, such as international aid. This decision has been criticized as a disservice to public health, leaving a critical gap in scientific knowledge at a time when it is most needed.
- Biden Personally: The NTP research found evidence that the exact brain tumor his own son died from, glioblastoma, could have been caused by exposure to cell phone level radiation, and Biden still allowed research funding to be cut, even after being implicated as causation for his son’s cancer death.
Advocacy for Continued Research
EHT Letter to Biden Ignored: Environmental Health Trust Scientists and international experts sent a letter to President Biden on April 21, 2021, urging immediate action to reduce and restrict the rapid increase of harmful wireless microwave radiofrequency radiation (RFR). The letter emphasized the biological and ecological impacts of wireless radiation and called for wired infrastructure for broadband.
RF Safe: We don’t think a wired world is possible at scale anymore, so we support the use of light, as explained in US Patent US11700058B2 by inventor John Coates, founder of RF Safe.
Policy Recommendations: The letter included several policy recommendations, such as focusing on wired infrastructure for broadband, halting the 5G rollout until environmental and health impacts are assessed, and developing science-based safety limits for human and wildlife exposure to RFR.
Supporting Studies and Resources
- Interphone Study: A multinational study coordinated by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) examining the potential link between cell phone use and brain tumors.
- Hardell Group Studies: Research led by Dr. Lennart Hardell, indicating increased risk of brain tumors associated with long-term cell phone use.
- CERENAT Study: A French study showing a significant increase in brain tumor risk with prolonged cell phone use.
- U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP): Comprehensive research indicating clear evidence of cancer risk from cell phone radiation.
- Ramazzini Institute Study: An independent Italian study corroborating the findings of the NTP.
- REFLEX Project: A European Union-funded research project demonstrating genetic damage from low-level electromagnetic fields.
- BioInitiative Report: An extensive review of over 2000 studies indicating various health risks from electromagnetic fields.
- Dr. Henry Lai’s Research: Studies demonstrating DNA damage and other biological effects from RF radiation.
Beyond Thermal Effects: The Promise of Bioelectric Medicine
Advancements in RF radiation research show biological interactions beyond thermal effects. The FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment is a prime example. This treatment employs RF radiation at power levels up to 1000 times lower than those emitted by cell phones to effectively treat inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions at the cellular or molecular level. These interactions include resonance effects, disruption of cellular signaling, and potential modulation of the immune system.
This challenges the traditional view that non-ionizing cell phone radiation is biologically inert except for its heating properties. The potential of bioelectric medicine to revolutionize healthcare is enormous, offering new avenues for treating various diseases by understanding and leveraging the complexities of bioelectricity and its role in governing biological processes.
Children Are at Greater Risk
The physiological and developmental characteristics of children make them particularly vulnerable to the effects of RF radiation. Their thinner skulls and higher tissue conductivity allow for greater absorption of RF energy into their developing brains. Additionally, since their bodies are still developing, they are at a higher risk of DNA damage from oxidative stress caused by RF radiation.
Implications for Children’s Health:
- Developmental Delays: Studies have suggested that RF radiation exposure can affect children’s cognitive and motor skills development.
- Behavioral Disorders: Research has linked exposure to RF radiation with changes in behavior, such as increased hyperactivity and attention deficits.
- Increased Cancer Risk: The potential for developing cancer from RF radiation may be higher in children due to the cumulative effect of exposure over their lifespan.
Concerns are mounting
Scientific debates are intensifying, and regulatory bodies seem to lag behind the latest scientific findings. Let’s investigate why doubts about the safety of RF radiation persist among the public and underscore the urgent need to reinstate government-funded studies, such as those previously conducted by the National Toxicology Program (NTP), and pressure regulatory bodies like the FCC to update their guidelines.
Growing Doubts Among the Public The crux of the public’s concern lies in the continuous influx of scientific studies suggesting potential health risks associated with RF radiation—ranging from carcinogenic effects to neurological disruptions. Yet, there remains a significant gap between these scientific findings and the existing regulatory standards, which primarily consider thermal effects and disregard non-thermal interactions. This discrepancy fosters distrust and anxiety, as consumers are left to wonder about the long-term impacts of their everyday technology use.
The Halting of NTP Studies: A Setback for Public Health In 2024, the NTP discontinued its research into the biological and environmental impacts of cell phone radiation, citing funding constraints and technological challenges. This decision came shortly after their studies indicated clear evidence of cancer in rats exposed to RF radiation levels similar to those emitted by cell phones. The halting of such pivotal research not only stalls further understanding of RF radiation effects but also leaves the public without the reassurance of ongoing, rigorous assessment of potential risks.
The FCC’s Outdated Guidelines Simultaneously, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been criticized for its outdated RF exposure guidelines, which have not been significantly updated in over two decades. A recent court ruling highlighted the agency’s failure to consider newer scientific evidence, calling its adherence to old standards “arbitrary and capricious.” This stagnation in regulatory updates fails to protect public health and may potentially hinder technological and industrial innovation by maintaining inadequate safety standards.
The Urgent Need for Action The solution to the growing public concern and scientific debate is not to cease research but to embrace it fully. Ending government-funded studies on RF radiation impacts prematurely is a disservice not only to public health but also to industries that could benefit from clear, updated regulations. By understanding the full scope of RF radiation effects, industries could innovate more effectively and safely, ensuring consumer trust and compliance with health standards.
Reinstating Research and Updating Regulations It is imperative that entities like the NTP receive the support and funding needed to continue their research. Furthermore, regulatory bodies such as the FCC must be urged to update their guidelines in line with the latest scientific findings. This dual approach will ensure that public health is protected, consumer confidence is restored, and industries are provided with a clear framework within which to innovate.
As we navigate an increasingly wireless world, the stakes are too high to ignore the potential risks associated with RF radiation. Reinstating halted government-funded research and updating outdated regulatory guidelines are crucial steps towards safeguarding public health and fostering a culture of trust and safety in technology use. It’s time for policymakers, industry leaders, and the scientific community to unite in addressing these urgent concerns and ensure a safer future for all.
By addressing these issues head-on, we can ensure a healthier and safer future for all Americans. President Trump, the time to act is now! Show the RFK Jr. supporters that you are willing to fight for them, too! The American people’s health is paramount, and this issue transcends political boundaries. It’s time to unite and prioritize the well-being of our citizens.
VISIT RF SAFE’S TRIBUTE SITE LIBERTYUNITES
