A National Crisis
In the 21st century, few inventions have reshaped our everyday lives as profoundly as the cell phone. From toddlers to grandparents, nearly everyone now carries a device that emits radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Indeed, we use them for staying in touch, for schooling, for entertainment—and we place them in the hands of children at increasingly younger ages.
Yet as we charge forward into an ever-more wireless world, many scientists and concerned citizens have raised alarms about whether current safety standards are keeping pace with the research. A pivotal figure in unveiling these concerns was the National Toxicology Program (NTP), a federally funded initiative that conducted a decade-long study identifying a potential link between cell phone-type RF radiation and cancer. Shockingly, under President Joe Biden’s administration, funding for this important research was redirected, effectively halting what could be one of the most vital health investigations of our time.
This blog is an urgent appeal to President Donald Trump, imploring him to step in, restore the NTP’s research funding, and protect the health of future generations. It addresses the outmoded guidelines at the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), the unresolved question of “thermal vs. non-thermal” RF effects, the constitutionality (or unconstitutionality) of Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, and the deeper questions of how big-industry influence can undermine public health.
2. America’s Critical Research Setback
The Halted NTP Study
The National Toxicology Program had invested ten years in exploring whether radiofrequency radiation—the kind used by cell phones—could pose carcinogenic risks to humans. Early results indicated clear evidence that RF radiation could promote malignant gliomas in rats at exposure levels comparable to heavy cell phone use. Similar studies at the Ramazzini Institute in Italy also found malignant tumors at even lower exposure levels.
But rather than expanding this critical science, the Biden administration redirected funds away from the NTP project. This effectively ended one of the most comprehensive investigations into the safety of modern wireless devices. It also left the American public vulnerable, lacking data that might inform how to protect children, the elderly, and everyone in between.
International Comparisons
Several nations—including France, Belgium, and Australia—have taken proactive measures against potential RF health hazards. Some have banned cell phone use in schools or placed restrictions on how close cell towers can be installed near playgrounds. Meanwhile, the United States lags behind, its guidelines dating back to 1996, when “smartphones” did not yet exist.
Our Request:
We urge President Donald Trump to restore funding and leadership for the NTP’s cell phone radiation research, modernize the FCC’s safety guidelines, and safeguard America’s children and families.
3. Elon Musk’s Dismissal of RF Risks
A Visionary’s Contradiction
Elon Musk has often portrayed himself as a disruptor and forward thinker—revolutionizing space travel (SpaceX), electric vehicles (Tesla), and satellite broadband (Starlink). Yet his casual comments on The Joe Rogan Experience about wearing “a helmet of cell phones around my head and around my nuts” trivialize legitimate health concerns regarding non-thermal effects of RF radiation.
Musk’s remarks are more than just flippant; they resonate widely, shaping public perception and potentially dismissing decades of research. Indeed, while Starlink and satellite-based solutions might reduce ground-based tower exposures, they still rely on RF transmissions—raising questions about how or whether these satellite signals might influence human biology.
The Need for Scientific Humility
Musk, and other influential tech leaders, stand at a crossroads: they can either continue dismissing the science on non-thermal RF effects or they can become champions of modernizing standards and designing safer technological deployments. Given Musk’s track record of breaking through stagnant industries, it’s ironic that on the topic of RF safety, he appears aligned with a regulatory status quo that dates back to an era of flip phones.
4. Section 704: A Constitutional Crisis
A Violation of the First and Tenth Amendments
Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, signed into law by President Bill Clinton, forbids local governments from blocking the construction of cell towers on the basis of health or environmental concerns. This clause effectively neuters the First Amendment right to petition the government for redress of grievances. By preventing community members from presenting health evidence in court, the law stifles vital discourse and lumps local authorities into a position of forced compliance.
Additionally, it infringes upon states’ rights under the Tenth Amendment, leaving municipalities powerless to protect schools, neighborhoods, and other sensitive areas from high-density RF exposure. Critics argue that Section 704 is not just outdated; it’s unconstitutional.
Clinton-Epstein Era
It’s notable that this legislation emerged in what some call the “Clinton-Epstein era,” a time during which the White House had questionable influences at play. Reports confirm that Jeffrey Epstein visited the White House multiple times in the 1990s, raising suspicions about how corporate and personal interests shaped key policy decisions. While we may never fully uncover Epstein’s exact role, the result is an American public now saddled with an archaic law that silences local input and steamrolls community health concerns.
5. Why the FCC’s Outdated Guidelines Endanger Public Health
The 1996 Thermal-Only Paradigm
The FCC’s existing safety standards focus almost exclusively on avoiding the thermal (heating) effects of RF radiation—if you’re not getting “cooked,” it’s assumed you’re fine. But an ever-growing body of peer-reviewed research challenges that premise. Scientists have observed non-thermal biological effects, including:
- Oxidative stress leading to DNA breaks
- Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel (VGCC) activation, affecting heart and neuronal tissues
- Endocrine disruption, potentially impacting hormones
- Behavioral and neurological changes (e.g., in autism or ADHD)
2021 Court Ruling
In a 2021 lawsuit brought by the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a federal court found that the FCC had not presented adequate evidence to justify the safety of its guidelines for non-thermal RF exposures. The court’s decision indicates the agency must revisit and potentially overhaul its current regulations. However, without a clear political mandate, little progress has been made.
Children’s Vulnerability
Young brains absorb RF radiation more easily due to thinner skulls and developing nervous systems. With kids now using smartphones and tablets in school, and often living near cell towers, this untested experiment poses a serious public health question. Are we gambling with an entire generation’s mental and physical wellbeing?
6. Restarting the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Cancer Research
The Problem
The NTP’s decade-long study offered “clear evidence” that RF radiation could be carcinogenic in animal models. Instead of bolstering that research or expanding upon these alarming data, the Biden administration redirected funds, leaving key questions unanswered.
Evidence of Harm
- NTP Animal Studies: Showed a higher incidence of malignant gliomas and schwannomas (particularly in the heart) in rats exposed to high levels of RF.
- Ramazzini Institute: Found parallel cancer risks at lower, “far-field” exposures, comparable to living near cell towers.
- Therapeutic Paradox: The FDA recently approved a device (TheraBionic) that uses low-power RF radiation to treat inoperable liver cancer, ironically proving that non-thermal RF effects can be biologically significant—either beneficial or harmful, depending on context.
Why It Matters
By cutting off the NTP’s research, we may be abandoning our best chance to understand not only cancer-related dangers but also possible therapeutic uses of RF. We remain in the dark, with no strategy for protecting children or guiding new infrastructure that is safe as well as efficient.
7. Regulatory Capture: Prioritizing Profits Over Public Health
Industry Influence at the FCC
Critics have long decried a “revolving door” between the FCC and the wireless industry. For instance, former FCC Chair Tom Wheeler once served as a top lobbyist for telecom companies. When those setting the regulations have deep industry ties, it raises serious questions about impartiality.
The Consequences
- The rapid expansion of 5G occurs without robust safety testing for non-thermal impacts.
- Public trust erodes as influential figures appear to sideline the science.
- Schools become saturated with wireless devices, routers, and towers, even as some researchers call for a cautious approach.
Our Demand:
We call upon President Trump to ensure that future FCC leadership is free from direct ties to the wireless industry and that genuine oversight prioritizes public welfare over corporate profit.
8. Amending the Telecommunications Act of 1996
The Problem: Section 704
This single clause effectively blocks local communities from voicing health or environmental concerns regarding cell tower placement. The result: Towns cannot legally argue that an installation might harm children if placed near a school, because Section 704 disallows health arguments in the permitting process.
Restoring Local Rights
We must amend or repeal Section 704 to give states and municipalities the power to:
- Impose minimum distances between cell towers and schools or playgrounds.
- Challenge tower placements in residential areas based on updated health data.
- Hold telecom providers accountable for potential negligence or health damages.
Such changes would reflect a more balanced approach, respecting the Tenth Amendment and ensuring that local voices are heard.
9. A Personal Story: The Inspiration Behind RF Safe
John Coates’ Journey
John Coates, founder of RF Safe, lost his daughter, Angel Leigh, to a severe neural tube defect in 1995. Two years later, research emerged suggesting that microwave radiation exposure could increase neural tube defects by 300%. This coincidence propelled him to investigate the potential biological impacts of RF, culminating in the establishment of RF Safe.
Coates also discovered that the government began fortifying grain with folic acid and B12 to reduce neural tube defects, but that alone didn’t address the possibility that RF exposure might be compounding these birth anomalies. This personal tragedy provides a stark backdrop to the broader conversation about non-thermal RF effects and “entropic waste”—the random “noise” that EMFs can introduce into sensitive developmental processes.
From Small Business Success to Advocacy
Coates left behind thriving automotive and limousine enterprises to dedicate himself full-time to raising awareness about EMF hazards. His journey encapsulates the triumphs and tribulations of an entrepreneur who gave up financial security to champion a cause he believes is critical to public health.
10. Non-Thermal RF Effects and the Rise of Health Concerns
Beyond Cancer: Autism, ADHD, and More
Many scientists now speculate that non-thermal RF effects could also be associated with:
- Autism spectrum disorders: Anecdotal “hotspots” sometimes correlate with dense tower installations.
- ADHD and learning disabilities: RF exposure may alter normal brainwave patterns, especially in children.
- Gender dysphoria and hormonal changes: Some hypothesize that chronic EMF exposure could disrupt endocrine function, influencing identity development.
- Empathy Deficit Disorder: Could a portion of rising behavioral issues, such as increases in school violence, link to subtle neurological impacts from daily RF immersion?
While these connections remain debated, the possibility alone should prompt further, not less, research.
Sleep Disruption: The Sousouri et al. 5G Study
A recent study by Sousouri and colleagues showed that 5G exposure can alter sleep spindles in certain individuals carrying specific genetic variants (CACNA1C). Sleep spindles play a significant role in memory consolidation and synaptic plasticity. Changes in their frequency, even if minor, could have long-term cognitive and developmental consequences—again pointing to non-thermal, bio-electrical disruptions that never register on thermal-based safety tests.
11. Call to President Donald Trump: Five Reasons to Act
- Public Health Legacy
By reinstating the NTP research and updating safety guidelines, President Trump can leave a lasting positive legacy—potentially preventing millions of future illnesses. - Pro-Children, Pro-Family
Children are particularly vulnerable to RF exposure. Actions to protect them resonate across party lines. - Strategic Global Leadership
America has always led in technology. Leading in health and safety standards simultaneously would reaffirm our world leadership. - Job Creation Through Research and Innovation
Funding robust, independent science spurs high-skilled jobs and fosters new technological breakthroughs. - Restoring Trust in Institutions
Eliminating industry-favoring policies and preventing further regulatory capture can rebuild public faith in governmental agencies.
12. Protecting America’s Future: Specific Steps Forward
1. Update FCC Safety Guidelines
- Embrace Modern Science: Incorporate non-thermal research into the official safety thresholds.
- Mandatory Child-Specific Standards: Young brains are not simply “small adult brains.” They deserve specialized guidelines that reflect developmental vulnerabilities.
2. Restart National Toxicology Program (NTP) Cancer Research
- Fund the Next Phase: Investigate how chronic, low-level exposures affect children, pregnant women, and other susceptible groups.
- Pursue Therapeutic Avenues: Explore how certain EMFs (like the TheraBionic device) might be harnessed beneficially.
3. End FCC Regulatory Capture
- Appoint Independent Leaders: FCC chairs and top policymakers should have no financial or lobbying ties to the telecom industry.
- Enforce Transparency: Require full disclosure of lobbying activities, studies funded by industry, and potential conflicts of interest.
4. Amend Section 704 of the Telecom Act
- Restore Local Autonomy: Give states and municipalities the legal standing to block or re-site towers based on health considerations.
- Encourage Safer Tech: By removing the “blank check” that telecoms currently have, new safer strategies (e.g., more robust fiber, satellite-based connectivity, or micro-cells placed away from schools) may emerge.
5. Leverage the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
- Recognize Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS): Some individuals experience debilitating symptoms from EMF exposure; the ADA could mandate low-EMF zones in public buildings, schools, and workplaces.
- Push for Space-/Fiber-Based Solutions: Satellite broadband or underground fiber lines can minimize ground-level exposures in heavily populated areas.
13. Conclusion: Reclaiming Our Rights—and Our Children’s Future
We live in a country founded on the principles of individual freedom, local governance, and a government that responds to its people’s legitimate concerns. Yet, when it comes to RF radiation from cell phones, tablets, and 5G towers, these principles have been eroded by outdated legislation (Section 704) and by a regulatory framework that clings to a 1996 thermal-only safety paradigm.
Mr. President, America’s Children Need You
Our plea is simple but urgent:
- Repeal or amend Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act to restore local rights.
- Revive the NTP research that the Biden administration defunded so critical cancer findings do not vanish.
- Modernize FCC guidelines to include non-thermal RF effects, especially for children.
In a rapidly advancing digital age, genuine leadership entails not just championing new technologies, but ensuring they are safe for all. President Donald Trump, we ask that you seize this opportunity to safeguard future generations. Help us restore confidence in our institutions and keep America at the forefront of both innovation and public health.
Countless families who have already lost loved ones to brain tumors or other diseases possibly linked to RF exposure—and countless more families wanting to protect their children—are looking to you. We stand at a crossroads: Will we remain tethered to an archaic 1996 standard and laws that silence public concern, or will we usher in a new era of transparent science and careful stewardship?
The future depends on bold action today. For the sake of America’s children, we urge you to restore the NTP’s essential research, reform the FCC’s outdated rules, and defend our constitutional rights to safer communities and informed decision-making. Let the world know that the United States still leads not only in wireless innovation but also in safeguarding the well-being of its people.
From all of us—parents, researchers, activists, and citizens—thank you for listening. We trust that you will rise to the occasion and help shield our children and grandchildren from silent, invisible threats we are only just beginning to understand.
Remember: Technology and safety are not mutually exclusive. With the right vision and leadership, we can have both—and the time to act is now.
For More Information and Ways to Help
- RF Safe – Advocates for updated safety standards and consumer awareness of EMF exposure: www.rfsafe.com
- National Toxicology Program – Past and present studies on cell phone radiation and cancer
- Environmental Health Trust (EHT) – Ongoing legal and advocacy efforts pushing for safer wireless standards
- BioInitiative Report – Compilation of over 1,800 studies on electromagnetic field (EMF) health impacts
- TheraBionic – FDA-approved RF-EMF therapy for certain cancers, illustrating biological effects at non-thermal levels
Stand with us: Call or write your representatives, share this blog with friends, practice safer-tech habits, and insist that the U.S. government protect future generations from potential RF hazards. Let us build an America that leads by both technological prowess and moral responsibility.
