A New Direction for U.S. Health Policy
On February 13, 2025, President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order entitled “Establishing the President’s Make America Healthy Again Commission.” This sweeping initiative underscores the administration’s acknowledgment of an urgent health crisis—particularly among children—where chronic illnesses (e.g., diabetes, asthma, autoimmune disorders) are on the rise.
The order lays out a comprehensive approach: investigating everything from diet, lifestyle, and toxins to electromagnetic radiation—a surprise inclusion that has sparked curiosity in the scientific and public health community. With Robert F. Kennedy Jr. now leading the Department of Health and Human Services, many speculate the focus on EMFs aligns with his long-standing push for more rigorous research into non-thermal RF effects.
Why This Executive Order Is Significant
-
Elevated Focus on Childhood Chronic Disease
The United States now confronts an alarming surge in youth health conditions—ranging from autoimmune disorders to autism. By creating a commission specifically aimed at reversing these trends, the administration is signaling that incremental fixes are insufficient. -
Inclusion of EMFs
Typically overshadowed by more familiar factors like diet or chemicals, electromagnetic radiation rarely gets official government attention. Its explicit mention paves the way for possible large-scale or “gold-standard” studies. -
Holistic Policy Framework
By incorporating agriculture, environment, education, and even potential “corporate influence or cronyism,” the order hints at far-reaching reforms. If executed well, it could unify multiple agencies under a single, health-centric mission.
Key Sections of the Executive Order
The Executive Order is divided into several major sections, each articulating a specific focus area.
Purpose
The order starts by acknowledging the U.S. chronic disease crisis and the stark contrast between American life expectancy and that of other developed nations. It cites escalating rates of cancer, asthma, obesity, and mental illness, particularly among children. The focus: to redirect national resources and attention to the root causes of why Americans, especially the youth, are getting sick.
Policy
This section establishes the Federal Government’s role in aggressively combating critical health challenges. Key policy points:
- Empowering Americans via Transparency: All federally funded health research must be open-source and free from conflicts of interest.
- Prioritizing Root Causes: From dietary factors to new “environmental impacts,” the government aims to find what truly drives chronic disease.
- Ensuring “Healthiest Food”: Collaboration with farmers to maintain food affordability and quality.
- Shifting Healthcare Paradigms: Promoting prevention and lifestyle changes, rather than treating diseases after they manifest.
Composition of the Make America Healthy Again Commission
The Commission is chaired by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (Secretary of HHS) and includes high-level figures:
- Secretaries of Agriculture, Education, Veterans Affairs, etc.
- Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency
- Heads of NIH, CDC, FDA
The Commission reports to the President with the Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy acting as Executive Director.
Fighting Childhood Chronic Disease
This is arguably the Executive Order’s core directive. It tasks the Commission to:
“Study the scope of the childhood chronic disease crisis and any potential contributing causes, including … electromagnetic radiation, and corporate influence or cronyism.”
The Commission must advise on how to educate the public about chronic disease threats and propose government-wide strategies to tackle them. The explicit reference to electromagnetic radiation is a milestone, highlighting an area previously absent from mainstream federal health discourse.
Initial Assessment and Strategy
Within 100 days, the Commission must submit an initial “Make Our Children Healthy Again Assessment,” comparing U.S. childhood chronic disease rates to global benchmarks and identifying potential environmental and lifestyle triggers. By 180 days, they must offer a Strategy for restructuring the Federal Government’s response—recommending ways to eliminate unhelpful programs and introducing new solutions to end childhood chronic disease.
Electromagnetic Radiation: Why Its Mention Matters
EMF and Childhood Health Concerns
While radiation usually calls to mind nuclear or ionizing forms, non-ionizing radiation from Wi-Fi, cell towers, and other wireless devices has been a growing point of contention. Some research suggests non-thermal biological effects (e.g., changes to cellular signaling, DNA strand breaks, oxidative stress) could contribute to various chronic conditions. Children’s developing bodies may be more vulnerable to these exposures.
By naming electromagnetic radiation alongside environmental toxins and poor diets, the Commission acknowledges science that has often been sidelined in public policy. Parents worried about cell towers near schools, heavy Wi-Fi use in classrooms, or potential links to neurobehavioral issues may find a more receptive ear in the new Commission.
Historical Inertia on EMF Research
In the past decade, the National Toxicology Program (NTP) was among the few federal bodies studying RF (radiofrequency) radiation’s health impacts. However, after it found “clear evidence” of carcinogenicity, funding was halted—leading many to allege that industry or political interests intervened.
Now, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at HHS and the Commission explicitly mandated to examine EMFs, we could witness a revival or expansion of federal EMF research. This shift could also spur cross-agency collaboration with the FCC, EPA, and academic institutions.
Actions and Implications for Federal Agencies
The Role of HHS and RFK Jr.
As the Commission’s chair, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wields substantial influence in:
- Setting Research Agendas: Deciding which lines of inquiry (e.g., EMFs, chemicals, dietary changes) receive priority.
- Integrating Non-Mainstream Topics: Ensuring electromagnetic fields remain on the Commission’s radar and that any new findings translate into actionable guidelines.
- Overseeing Interagency Collaboration: Working with the CDC, NIH, FDA, and more to unify data, release previously unpublished analyses, and protect scientific integrity from undue influence.
Expanded Interagency Collaboration
The Commission unites officials from agriculture, education, housing, veterans affairs, and environmental protection—suggesting a multidisciplinary approach to childhood health. For EMF issues:
- The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) may step in to evaluate the environmental impacts of wireless networks.
- The FCC might be pressured to revisit or modernize its 1996 RF exposure guidelines, especially given new data from NTP-like studies.
Potential Restructuring of Research Priorities
By directing “gold-standard” studies on root causes, the Commission could allocate federal grants to academic institutions investigating non-thermal EMF effects—filling the void left by the shuttered NTP program. This may also prompt:
- Revival of halted NTP studies or new large-scale, multi-year research.
- Creation of specialized EMF research centers, possibly under NIH or in collaboration with private foundations.
Impact on the EMF Research Landscape
Revisiting the NTP RF Studies
The NTP’s groundbreaking work identified tumors (gliomas, schwannomas) linked to low-level RF exposure. Now that the Commission is explicitly examining electromagnetic radiation, there’s a strong impetus to revisit these results—possibly leading to extended or more robust studies that examine:
- Dose-response relationships for non-thermal exposure.
- Long-term developmental outcomes, particularly in children.
- Mechanisms (e.g., oxidative stress, blood-brain barrier disruption, epigenetic changes).
Coordinating With Other Health Initiatives
Because the order also names diet, toxins, and lifestyle factors, researchers may adopt multifactorial models of childhood disease. For instance, synergy between poor nutrition and chronic RF exposure could be investigated, or the role of EMFs in autoimmune conditions might be studied alongside chemical pollutants.
Stakeholder Engagement and Public Participation
The Commission is empowered to hold hearings, roundtables, and public events. EMF advocacy groups, scientists specializing in bioelectromagnetics, and parents concerned about wireless tech in schools can now present testimonies and data, shaping future federal guidelines or policy recommendations.
The Bigger Picture: Chronic Disease and Children’s Health
The significance of the Commission extends far beyond EMFs. The order references a broader crisis in childhood health—high rates of autism, ADHD, obesity, asthma, and more.
Food Quality, Chemicals, and Lifestyle
- Agriculture: Federal agencies will collaborate with farmers to ensure the “healthiest” food supply.
- Environmental Toxins: Beyond EMFs, the Commission is set to examine chemicals, heavy metals, and other pollutants.
- Lifestyle & Overmedication: The growing reliance on pharmaceuticals, especially in young populations, is under scrutiny.
Overmedication and Mental Health
The Executive Order highlights mental health and the rise in prescription drug use (e.g., SSRIs, stimulants). If the Commission’s data show correlations between certain exposures—like electromagnetic fields or dietary toxins—and mental health issues, new guidelines could recommend alternative therapies or stricter prescription oversight.
Economic and National Security Dimensions
Chronic illnesses weigh heavily on the U.S. economy; 90% of annual healthcare spending addresses such conditions. Additionally, 77% of young adults are ineligible for military service largely due to health issues, reflecting the intersection of national security and public health.
Challenges and Critiques
No large-scale policy shift is without hurdles.
Funding and Resource Allocation
- Budget Constraints: While the order is ambitious, Congress must appropriate funds for new research. Skeptics question whether these efforts will secure enough financial support to drive meaningful change.
- Laboratories and Expertise: Reviving or expanding EMF research requires specialized equipment and scientists familiar with bioelectromagnetics.
Balancing Industry Interests
The telecom and wireless industries wield significant influence, often pushing back on non-thermal risk assessments. The Commission’s success may hinge on its ability to shield scientific inquiry from lobbying and ensure public health remains paramount.
Scientific Complexity and Causation
Chronic diseases often stem from multifactorial causes—diet, genetics, stress, chemical exposures, and possibly EMFs. Demonstrating a direct causative link can be challenging, requiring long-term epidemiological and mechanistic studies that must carefully control for confounding variables.
Timeline and Next Steps
- Within 100 Days: The Commission must provide the “Make Our Children Healthy Again Assessment,” compiling data on childhood disease prevalence and possible triggers, including electromagnetic radiation.
- Within 180 Days: A comprehensive strategy recommending how to restructure federal approaches to childhood disease prevention. This likely includes proposed changes in research funding, guideline updates, and possible new policy frameworks for addressing EMFs and other identified factors.
Looking Ahead
After the 180-day mark, the Commission may reconvene to refine or expand its mission. Public hearings or collaborations with foreign institutions (some of which have stricter EMF guidelines) could also occur. The results might shape how agencies like CDC, EPA, FDA, and FCC approach the interplay of technology and health.
A Potential Watershed Moment for Children’s Health
President Trump’s “Make America Healthy Again Commission” signals a broad reevaluation of the factors contributing to America’s chronic disease epidemic in children. Notably, electromagnetic radiation is now part of a federal conversation that includes more conventional concerns like nutrition, toxins, and lifestyle. Under the guidance of Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the Commission has the authority to:
- Kickstart new or resumed federal research into EMFs, bridging the gap left by the halted NTP program.
- Promote interagency cooperation, ensuring the knowledge of various scientific and public health bodies is combined effectively.
- Issue public-facing guidance and educational materials, empowering families to make informed decisions about screen time, device usage, and other EMF-related exposures.
For the EMF safety community, this executive order is a beacon of hope—an official indication that the government may no longer dismiss concerns about non-thermal radiation effects. For parents and educators, it could herald guidelines that better protect children’s developing bodies and minds. Ultimately, only time will tell how effectively the Commission can navigate political and economic obstacles to achieve its lofty goals. Yet, the door is now opened wider than ever before for a robust, transparent examination of how modern technology—and the associated electromagnetic environment—might contribute to the nation’s chronic disease burden.
If successful, the Make America Healthy Again Commission could be remembered as a turning point in U.S. public health policy—one that not only addresses conventional environmental toxins and lifestyle factors but also finally shines a governmental spotlight on the long-neglected realm of EMF research.