Apple iPhone 16 FCC SAR Test Explained – Understanding the Report Summary

Let’s break down the SAR table for the regular Apple iPhone 16 (Model A3081). Additionally, I’ll be discussing the FCC lawsuit involving RFK Jr.

Apple iPhone 16 SAR Level Summary:

The cellular transmission SAR values for the Apple iPhone 16 (FCC ID BCG-E8688A) are 1.08 W/kg (watts per kilogram) at the head and 1.17 W/kg when worn on the body. The hotspot/Airplay SAR level is 1.17 W/kg. The simultaneous transmission SAR values for iPhone 16 (cellular plus Wi-Fi) is 1.49 W/kg at the head1.54 W/kg when worn on the body, and 1.54 W/kg when used as a hotspot simultaneously with other transmitters active.

Which iPhone 16 Model Has the Lowest Radiation?

iPhone 16

Head SAR (Cellular Only)
Radiation Levels Head Body Hot Spot
Cellular Only 1.08 W/kg 1.17 W/kg 1.17 W/kg
Wi-Fi + Cellular 1.49 W/kg 1.54 W/kg 1.54 W/kg

The Apple iPhone 16 (Model A3081), one of the latest releases in Apple’s 2024 lineup, has brought a fresh wave of excitement for tech enthusiasts and consumers. But beyond the sleek design and cutting-edge technology lies a hidden danger: the specific absorption rate (SAR) levels of this device, which measure the rate at which the body absorbs radiofrequency (RF) energy from the phone. As we dive into the data, it’s critical to address not just the reported SAR levels but also the broader implications of cell phone radiation on health—and the regulatory failures that allow outdated safety standards to persist.

What Is SAR and Why It Matters

The SAR value is a measure of the rate at which energy is absorbed by the body when exposed to an RF electromagnetic field, as with the radiation emitted by cell phones. It is one of the metrics used to ensure that cell phones comply with safety guidelines set by regulatory bodies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The SAR limit for the general population is 1.6 W/kg, measured over 1g of tissue, which was set to prevent thermal effects—the heating of body tissue due to RF exposure. However, these guidelines were established in 1996 and have failed to consider non-thermal biological effects such as DNA damage, oxidative stress, and neurological impacts, which have been increasingly documented by scientists.

Apple iPhone 16 SAR Breakdown

iPhone 16

Apple iPhone 16

Apple iPhone 16

Apple iPhone 16
Screen Size: 6.1 inches
147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mm (5.81 x 2.82 x 0.31 in)

Original price was: $69.99.Current price is: $45.47.

Apple iPhone 16
Head SAR (Cellular Only)
1.08 W/kg
Body SAR (Cellular Only)
1.17 W/kg
Hot Spot SAR (Cellular Only)
1.17 W/kg
Head SAR (Wi-Fi + Cellular)
1.49 W/kg
Body SAR (Wi-Fi + Cellular)
1.54 W/kg
Hot Spot SAR (Wi-Fi + Cellular)
1.54 W/kg

Different SAR Test Positions

When measuring a phone’s SAR values, various test positions are considered to account for the different ways in which a phone is used. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) assesses several test positions to ensure that phones comply with the SAR limits for safe radiation exposure. These test positions include:

Cellular Values:

Simultaneous Values:

When evaluating a phone’s SAR values, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) measures radiation absorption across various test positions. These positions help account for different ways people use their phones, ensuring compliance with safety standards in all scenarios. The main test positions include:

1. Head SAR

This value measures the amount of radiation absorbed when the phone is held against the ear during a call. Since the brain is among the most sensitive organs to RF radiation, head SAR levels are critical in understanding the potential risks of radiation exposure during calls.

2. Body SAR

Body SAR measures radiation absorption when the phone is carried close to the body, such as in a pocket, bag, or attached to a belt. Given that many people keep their phones near their bodies throughout the day, this test is crucial in evaluating the continuous, low-level exposure that users may experience.

3. Hotspot SAR

When a phone is used as a Wi-Fi hotspot or is tethered to another device, it can emit substantial levels of RF energy. The hotspot SAR value represents the localized absorption of RF energy in this scenario. For users who frequently share their phone’s internet connection, it’s important to understand the risks associated with this mode of use.

4. Simultaneous SAR Values

As phones often operate with multiple radiofrequency transmitters (such as cellular, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth) active at the same time, the FCC also measures simultaneous SAR values:

5. Extremities SAR

Extremities SAR refers to the radiation absorbed by body parts like the hands, wrists, and ankles when in close contact with the phone. Since these areas are often in direct contact with the phone during use, extremities SAR can be particularly important for users who frequently hold their phones or wear devices in close proximity to their extremities.

The SAR levels for the Apple iPhone 16 (FCC ID BCG-E8688A) have been summarized in an official test report. Below is a detailed breakdown of these values, covering different usage scenarios:

Condition SAR Value (W/kg)
Head (single transmission) 1.082 W/kg
Body-worn (5mm distance) 1.167 W/kg
Hotspot usage (5mm distance) 1.167 W/kg
Extremities (direct contact) 2.388 W/kg

Simultaneous Transmission SAR Levels

When multiple transmitters (e.g., Wi-Fi and cellular) are active simultaneously, the SAR values increase due to the combined exposure:

Condition Simultaneous SAR Value (W/kg)
Head (Simultaneous TX) 1.493 W/kg
Body-worn (Simultaneous TX) 1.537 W/kg
Hotspot (Simultaneous TX) 1.537 W/kg
Extremities (Simultaneous TX) 2.501 W/kg

The highest reported power density (PD) for the device was 3.900 W/m², which is below the FCC’s limit of 10 W/m² for the general population.

The Broader Implications: Outdated Regulatory Standards

While these SAR levels fall within the current FCC guidelines, it is essential to understand that these standards were designed to protect the public from thermal effects, not the non-thermal biological effects that have been increasingly identified in scientific studies. The court ruling in 2021, where RFK Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust sued the FCC, found that the commission had ignored scientific evidence showing potential health risks from non-thermal RF exposure, especially for children.

The court ruled that the FCC’s failure to review its guidelines since 1996 was “arbitrary and capricious,” highlighting the need for an urgent reclassification of RF radiation risks to reflect modern-day research.

Health Risks from RF Radiation: The Science Speaks

The health effects of RF radiation from cell phones have been a topic of ongoing research, and the scientific community has presented compelling evidence that RF exposure can have significant biological effects, even at levels far below the current safety limits.

1. Cancer and Tumor Risk

Both the National Toxicology Program (NTP) in the U.S. and the Ramazzini Institute (RI) in Italy conducted extensive animal studies showing that long-term exposure to RF radiation significantly increased the risk of developing tumors, such as:

These studies have shown that even at exposure levels considered “safe” by the FCC, there is clear evidence of cancer development in lab animals. Importantly, these tumors are similar to the types observed in humans, suggesting that the findings are directly applicable to human health.

2. Neurological and Cognitive Effects

RF radiation has also been linked to neurological damage and cognitive deficits, particularly in children and adolescents. Exposure to RF radiation has been associated with:

Children, who have thinner skulls and developing brains, are particularly susceptible to the effects of RF radiation. Given the widespread use of cell phones among children and teenagers, the long-term public health implications could be severe.

3. Reproductive and Developmental Health

Several studies have found that RF radiation can affect reproductive health, particularly in men. Research shows that prolonged exposure to RF radiation can lead to:

Additionally, prenatal exposure to RF radiation has been linked to developmental issues, potentially leading to learning disabilities and behavioral problems later in life.

Regulatory Capture and the Misclassification of RF Radiation Risks

The misclassification of RF radiation risks as purely a concern of thermal effects has prevented the necessary regulatory changes that would better protect public health. The FCC, like other regulatory agencies worldwide, has been subject to regulatory capture, where the industries they regulate have significant influence over their policies.

1. Regulatory Failures

The FCC’s refusal to update its safety standards has left consumers vulnerable to the non-thermal effects of RF radiation, which are not considered in the current guidelines. The telecom industry’s lobbying efforts have successfully kept these outdated standards in place, preventing meaningful reform.

2. The 2021 FCC Lawsuit

In 2021, the Environmental Health Trust and RFK Jr. successfully sued the FCC, challenging the agency’s failure to update its RF radiation guidelines. The court’s ruling was a landmark victory for public health advocates, as it recognized the urgent need to reevaluate the risks posed by RF radiation, especially given the proliferation of wireless technology like 5G.

However, despite the court ruling, regulatory bodies have been slow to act, leaving consumers without adequate protection.


The Urgent Need for Updated Safety Standards

Given the increasing evidence of non-thermal biological effects and the growing exposure to RF radiation from devices like the Apple iPhone 16, it is imperative that we push for updated safety standards that reflect the current state of scientific knowledge.

What Needs to Be Done:


What You Can Do

While we wait for regulators to act, consumers can take steps to protect themselves from RF radiation exposure. Here are a few tips:

  1. Use radiation protection products, such as RF Safe cases, to reduce direct exposure to your phone.
  2. Limit cell phone use, especially for children.
  3. Avoid carrying your phone in your pocket or holding it close to your body.
  4. Use speaker mode or air-tube headsets to keep the phone away from your head.
  5. Disable Wi-Fi and Bluetooth when not in use.

The release of the Apple iPhone 16 highlights the ongoing regulatory failures that put public health at risk. While the device may meet FCC guidelines, these guidelines are woefully outdated and fail to account for the biological effects that can result from RF radiation exposure.

The time for action is now. We must demand better from our regulators and take steps to protect ourselves and our families from the unseen dangers of wireless radiation.

Breakdown of SAR Table:

1. Applicant Name & FCC ID:

2. Reference SAR Report:

3. SAR Limits (W/kg):

4. Exposure Categories:

5. RF Exposure Conditions:

6. SAR Values (W/kg):

7. Simultaneous Transmission (TX):

These SAR values reflect multiple wireless signals being transmitted at the same time (e.g., Wi-Fi and cellular):

8. Highest Reported PD (W/m²):

9. Date Tested & Test Results:


Highest Reported SAR (W/kg) for Apple iPhone 16 (A3081):

  1. Head (single TX):
    • 1.082 W/kg under the DTS condition.
  2. Body-worn (Dist. = 5 mm):
    • 1.167 W/kg under the NII condition.
  3. Hotspot (Dist. = 5 mm):
    • 1.167 W/kg under the DTS condition.
  4. Extremities (Dist. = 0 mm):
    • 2.388 W/kg under the TNE condition.

Simultaneous Transmission (TX) SAR Values:

  1. Head (Simultaneous TX):
    • 1.493 W/kg under multiple conditions (PCE, DTS, NII, 6CD).
  2. Body-worn (Simultaneous TX):
    • 1.537 W/kg under multiple conditions (NII, 6CD, DSS).
  3. Hotspot (Simultaneous TX):
    • 1.537 W/kg under multiple conditions (NII, 6CD, DSS).
  4. Extremities (Simultaneous TX):
    • 2.501 W/kg under the TNE condition.

Conclusion

The highest SAR values recorded for both the iPhone 16 and the iPhone 16 Pro Max models fall within the FCC’s current guidelines, which set limits of 1.6 W/kg for the general population in uncontrolled settings. However, it’s important to note that these guidelines, set over 25 years ago, are outdated. They fail to account for non-thermal effects and may not provide adequate protection, especially for children.

In 2021, RFK Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust successfully sued the FCC, proving that its SAR safety guidelines are insufficient and do not reflect the current state of knowledge about the biological effects of electromagnetic radiation. The court ruled that the FCC had ignored scientific evidence on the potential health impacts of RF radiation, particularly on children, and had not reviewed its guidelines since 1996.

This historic lawsuit marks a critical step in raising awareness about the dangers of cell phone radiation, reinforcing the need for updated safety standards that address the modern-day realities of wireless technology. Consumers should be proactive in protecting themselves by using products, like those from RF Safe, that help reduce exposure to harmful RF radiation.

 

Apple iPhone 16 Plus  – Apple iPhone 16  – Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max  – Apple iPhone 16 Pro

https://www.rfsafe.com/articles/cell-phone-radiation/apple-iphone-16-fcc-sar-test-explained-understanding-the-report-summary.html