WIRELESS RADIATION HEALTH RISK! ⚠

The 87% Risk You Can’t Ignore: The Truth About Cell Phone Radiation

For years, the telecom industry and regulators have assured us that cell phone radiation is safe. But when we look at the actual scientific consensus, including industry-funded research, the truth is far more alarming.

According to Consensus.app, a tool that analyzes peer-reviewed scientific literature, only 13% of studies conclude that cell phone radiation is safe. This means 87% of scientific research suggests some level of risk.

Would you accept an 87% chance of danger in any other aspect of your life? If a medication only had a 13% chance of being safe, would you take it? If an airplane had an 87% chance of crashing, would you board it?

Yet, we are exposing ourselves and our children to this risk every single day.


The Science is Clear: RF Radiation Poses a Serious Threat

The Consensus.app analyzed peer-reviewed studies on cell phone radiation and categorized them as follows:

What This Means: A Rigged Safety Narrative

The 13% of studies claiming safety almost certainly include industry-funded research. History has shown that corporations often fund research to produce favorable results, just as Big Tobacco did for decades.

This means that if we remove the likely biased industry-funded studies, the percentage of independent research concluding cell phone radiation is dangerous could be even higher.

📢 The reality is clear: The overwhelming scientific consensus points to risk—not safety.


RF Radiation is Already Used in Cancer Treatment—At Lower Levels Than Cell Phones

Perhaps the most damning evidence against the “cell phones are safe” myth is that RF radiation is already being used to treat cancer.

📢 If RF radiation at non-thermal levels can disrupt cancer cells, what is it doing to healthy ones with 24/7 exposure?


Why Children Are the Most Vulnerable

“Would you let your child take a drug that only has a 13% chance of being safe? Then why are we giving them wireless devices every day?”

Children are at the highest risk because:

With an 87% chance of harm, can we afford to take this risk with our children’s health?


Regulatory Capture: Why the FCC is Ignoring the Science

Despite overwhelming evidence of harm, the FCC has refused to update its wireless radiation safety guidelines since 1996.

📢 Why are we trusting an outdated, industry-controlled regulatory system that refuses to acknowledge modern science?


The Path Forward: What We Must Do Now

🚨 1. Repeal Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act

🚨 2. Push for FCC Safety Standard Updates

🚨 3. Reduce Exposure Immediately

🚨 4. Invest in Safer Technology

📢 The time for complacency is over. The science is here, the damage is real, and the solutions exist—but we need to demand them.


Final Thoughts: Are You Willing to Gamble With 87% Odds of Harm?

🚨 Join the movement: #TrumpRepeal704 🚨
📢 Protect your family. Demand accountability. Fight for real safety standards.

Because an 87% chance of harm is not a risk worth taking.

Source

SAR Information & Resources

Discover RF Safe’s exclusive interactive charts to compare phone radiation levels, explore how children’s exposure differs from adults, and learn practical ways to lower RF exposure. Compare All Phones

Children & RF Exposure

Kids absorb more radiation due to thinner skulls. Learn how to protect them.

See Child Safety Data
Exclusive RF Safe Charts

Compare real-world radiation data in interactive charts found only here at RF Safe.

Explore Charts
Reduce Wi-Fi & Bluetooth

Turning off unused transmitters significantly lowers your exposure.

See the Difference
🍏 Apple

View SAR

📱 Google

View SAR

📲 Samsung

View SAR