The evolution of Bitcoin from a dismissed concept to a financial cornerstone mirrors the potential trajectory of the RF radiation debate. Initially, traditional bankers dismissed Bitcoin as fraudulent, only to later embrace it as a pivotal financial instrument. This transformation underscores a broader truth: entrenched industry narratives can shift when they align with economic benefits.
The Parallel: Bitcoin and RF Safety
Much like the early days of Bitcoin, the tech industry, led by figures like Elon Musk, currently downplays the potential dangers of RF radiation. However, as the truth about RF radiation risks becomes undeniable, a shift in perspective is inevitable.
From Skeptic to Advocate: A Potential Shift
-
Space-Based Cell Towers: Moving cell towers into space can significantly reduce ground-level radiation exposure where cell towers are located on school grounds and apartment buildings. This approach would align with Musk’s ambitions for Starlink and space exploration, making it a lucrative pivot.
-
Embracing Li-Fi: As awareness grows, there will be a shift towards Li-Fi (light-based communication) over Wi-Fi for safer indoor connectivity. Musk could integrate this technology into Tesla vehicles, homes, and offices, positioning himself as a pioneer of health-conscious innovation.
-
Advocating for Policy Change: To stay ahead of the curve, Musk might support policies aimed at reducing RF exposure, aligning with government initiatives for safer technology, such as space-based broadband and Li-Fi compatibility for wireless products. This proactive stance could lead to new market opportunities and reinforce his reputation as a forward-thinking leader.
A Profitable Alignment with Truth
As the truth about RF radiation becomes undeniable, aligning with RF safety standards becomes not only a matter of public health but also a profitable business strategy for Elon Musk. By championing technologies that reduce RF exposure, he could once again position himself at the forefront of innovation, leading the charge towards a safer and more sustainable future. This shift would not only protect public health but also reinforce the idea that truth and profit can go hand in hand.