Worse Than Garbage: How the Biden-Harris Administration Neglects America’s Health and How Trump Plans to Fix It

The health and safety of American citizens should be the foremost priority of any administration. Yet, under the Biden-Harris leadership, many believe that our well-being has been treated worse than garbage. Critical health concerns, particularly regarding wireless radiation exposure and its potential links to cancer, have been neglected. In this critical moment, former President Donald Trump announces a plan to address these issues head-on, pledging to restore funding for vital cancer research and enforce updated safety guidelines. This article delves into the neglect under the current administration and outlines how Trump’s proposed actions aim to make America healthy again.


The Neglect of Critical Cancer Research

The Halting of National Toxicology Program (NTP) Studies

One of the most significant setbacks in public health under the Biden-Harris administration has been the defunding of the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) crucial cancer research on wireless radiation.

Despite the profound implications of this research, the administration chose to halt funding, effectively stalling progress in understanding and mitigating these health risks.

The Impact on Public Health


Outdated FCC Safety Guidelines: A Recipe for Disaster

The FCC’s Inaction

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for regulating interstate and international communications. However, its RF radiation exposure guidelines have not been meaningfully updated since 1996.

The Risks of Outdated Standards


RFK Jr.’s Victory Against the FCC

A Landmark Legal Battle

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. led a legal challenge against the FCC, culminating in a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that the FCC had failed to adequately address non-thermal health risks in its safety guidelines.

Lack of Action Post-Ruling

Despite the court’s decision, the FCC, under the Biden-Harris administration, has not updated its guidelines, leaving the public unprotected from potential health risks associated with RF radiation.


Trump’s Commitment to Making America Healthy Again

Restoring NTP Cancer Research Funding

Donald Trump has announced his intention to fully restore funding to the NTP’s vital cancer research.

Enforcing FCC Compliance with Court Orders

Trump pledges to ensure that the FCC complies with legal mandates to reevaluate and update safety guidelines.

Recognizing RFK Jr.’s Efforts


The Consequences of Neglecting Public Health

Treating Health Like Garbage

The metaphor of treating Americans’ health “like garbage” reflects the perceived neglect by the current administration.

Potential Health Risks


The Importance of Updated Safety Guidelines

Incorporating Non-Thermal Effects

Modern safety standards must consider both thermal and non-thermal effects of RF radiation.

Keeping Pace with Technological Advances


How Trump’s Plan Aims to Protect Americans

Reinstating Critical Research

Enforcing Accountability

Public Awareness and Education


Conclusion

The health of American citizens is not a partisan issue; it is a fundamental responsibility of the government. The Biden-Harris administration’s perceived neglect in addressing the potential risks of RF radiation exposure has left many feeling that their health is being treated worse than garbage. By pledging to restore critical cancer research funding and enforce updated safety guidelines, Donald Trump aims to prioritize the nation’s well-being and make America healthy again.

It is imperative for the government to act swiftly, basing decisions on the latest scientific evidence, and to protect current and future generations from potential health hazards. The time for neglect is over; proactive measures must be taken to ensure that technology advancements do not come at the expense of public health.


Frequently Asked Questions

1. Why is the NTP’s cancer research on wireless radiation important?

The National Toxicology Program’s research is one of the most comprehensive studies on the potential health effects of RF radiation from wireless devices. It provides critical insights into how prolonged exposure may increase the risk of certain cancers, informing safety guidelines and protective measures.

2. What did the U.S. Court of Appeals rule regarding the FCC’s safety guidelines?

In 2021, the court ruled that the FCC failed to provide a reasoned explanation for maintaining its 1996 safety guidelines without adequately addressing evidence of non-thermal health risks. The court ordered the FCC to reassess its guidelines based on current scientific research.

3. How does RF radiation potentially affect children’s health?

Children have developing brains and thinner skulls, which may allow deeper penetration of RF radiation. This could increase their susceptibility to potential health risks, including developmental issues and increased cancer risk.

4. What are non-thermal effects of RF radiation?

Non-thermal effects refer to biological changes caused by RF radiation that are not related to tissue heating. These can include DNA damage, oxidative stress, and alterations in cell signaling, which may contribute to health issues over time.

5. How can updated safety guidelines protect the public?

By incorporating the latest scientific findings, updated guidelines can set exposure limits that account for both thermal and non-thermal effects, reducing potential health risks associated with RF radiation.

6. What role did RFK Jr. play in addressing these issues?

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. led a legal challenge against the FCC, resulting in a court ruling that mandated the reassessment of outdated safety guidelines. His efforts brought significant attention to the potential health risks of RF radiation.

7. How does Trump plan to enforce FCC compliance?

Trump has pledged to ensure that the FCC complies with court orders by updating safety guidelines based on current science and holding the agency accountable for protecting public health.

8. Why is it said that the current administration treats health ‘like garbage’?

This metaphor reflects the perception that the Biden-Harris administration has neglected public health by not updating safety guidelines or funding critical research, thus disregarding the well-being of citizens.

9. What immediate actions can be taken to reduce RF radiation exposure?

Individuals can use hands-free devices, limit the use of wireless devices, keep devices away from the body, and turn off wireless functions when not in use to minimize exposure.

10. How can public awareness contribute to change?

Increased awareness can lead to greater public demand for action, encouraging policymakers to prioritize health issues, update safety guidelines, and fund essential research.


Final Thoughts

The intersection of technology and health presents complex challenges that require proactive and informed leadership. Neglecting potential risks associated with RF radiation exposure is not an option when the well-being of millions is at stake. By taking decisive action to restore research funding and enforce updated safety standards, we can ensure that advancements in technology do not come at the expense of our health.

It’s time to hold our leaders accountable and demand that they stop treating our health like garbage. Together, we can work towards a future where innovation and safety go hand in hand, making America not just great, but healthy again.

https://www.rfsafe.com/articles/cell-phone-radiation/worse-than-garbage-how-the-biden-harris-administration-neglects-americas-health-and-how-trump-plans-to-fix-it.html