Protecting Public Health by Restoring NTP Funding and Updating FCC Safety Guidelines
Fellow Voters,
Our health and safety are under threat due to recent decisions that have significantly impacted critical health research and safety regulations. I urge you to join me in addressing these issues by putting pressure on our candidates to take action. The cessation of important health research by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the urgent need to update the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) safety guidelines on electromagnetic radiation are matters of grave concern.
Biden’s Cancer Moonshot: A Red Herring
President Biden recently announced the distribution of $150 million in grants as part of his “Cancer Moonshot” initiative. While this may sound promising, it is nothing more than a red herring. The administration’s actions have, in fact, done more harm to cancer research than any single person on earth. Despite announcing this initiative, Biden has single-handedly terminated critical research that found clear evidence linking cell phone radiation to cancer, the very disease his own son succumbed to.
Restore NTP Funding for Critical Health Research
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) has been at the forefront of researching the health impacts of electromagnetic radiation. Their studies have provided clear evidence of cancer risks associated with high levels of RF radiation in rats. These findings are critical, showing that long-term exposure to RF radiation can lead to cancer. Despite these significant findings, the current administration has discontinued further studies due to funding constraints.
It’s especially alarming considering that the same cancer, glioblastoma, which claimed the life of President Biden’s son, Beau Biden, has been linked to cell phone radiation in these studies. Despite this personal connection, funding has been diverted away from this vital research. Biden has effectively ended research that could prevent more deaths from cancers like the one that took his son’s life.
Update FCC Safety Guidelines
The FCC’s safety guidelines for RF radiation, established in 1996, have not been updated to reflect recent scientific findings. A recent court ruling highlighted that the FCC had failed to adequately address the health effects of RF radiation beyond cancer, including potential impacts on reproductive health, neurological function, and children’s health.
Over the last 20 years, thousands of studies have indicated health risks from RFR, with the most significant findings emerging in the last 10 years. These studies, including major ones like the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, NTP, Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai, collectively point towards an increased health risk from cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. They suggest the need for caution in dismissing potential risks.
Non-Thermal Effects
Recent advancements in RF radiation research show biological interactions beyond thermal effects. For example, the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment employs RF radiation at power levels up to 1000 times lower than those emitted by cell phones, effectively treating inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions at the cellular or molecular level. This includes resonance effects, disruption of cellular signaling, and potential modulation of the immune system. This challenges the traditional view that non-ionizing cell phone radiation is biologically inert except for its heating properties.
Therapeutic Potential
Existing literature points toward a yet untapped therapeutic potential of RF-EMF treatment, which might aid in damaging cancer cells through bioelectrical and electromechanical molecular mechanisms while minimizing adverse effects on healthy tissue cells.
A Call to Action for Voters
Your voice matters. By advocating for the restoration of NTP funding and the update of FCC safety guidelines, you can make a significant impact on public health. The substantial body of research over the past two decades, particularly in the last ten years, underscores the health risks associated with RFR from cell phones. Non-thermal effects, which are not accounted for in current safety guidelines, pose significant concerns that have been validated by large-scale animal studies and recent genetic profiling research.
Given these findings, it is crucial to adopt precautionary measures, such as using hands-free devices, limiting call durations, and keeping cell phones away from the head and body. Public health policies and safety standards must be re-evaluated to ensure they adequately protect against the potential risks of RFR exposure.
I urge you to contact your candidates and demand action on these critical issues. Let them know that the health and safety of the American people should be a top priority. Together, we can ensure a healthier future for all Americans. Let’s unite in this endeavor and show our commitment to prioritizing the well-being of our citizens.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue.
The Tragic Cases of John McCain, Edward Kennedy, and Beau Biden
Senator John McCain: On August 25, 2018, Senator John McCain passed away from GBM, the same day as Senator Edward M. Kennedy died from the same cancer. McCain, a left-handed individual, often used his cell phone in his left hand. Additionally, his ranch was equipped with GSM cellular towers, exposing him to significant far-field radiation, which has been linked to the promotion of GBM.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy: Senator Kennedy died from GBM on August 25, 2009, exactly nine years before McCain. Kennedy’s frequent cell phone use, particularly on the same side as his tumor, has raised concerns about the impact of near-field radiation exposure.
Joseph “Beau” Biden III: Beau Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, died from GBM in 2015. Like Kennedy, Beau used his cell phone on the same side as his tumor, suggesting a potential link between near-field radiation exposure and the development of GBM.
Recent Politician Deaths and Rat Studies
The deaths of McCain, Kennedy, and Biden coincide with the findings of two significant rodent studies released in 2018. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) in the USA conducted a near-field exposure experiment, while the Ramazzini Institute in Italy conducted a far-field exposure study. Both studies suggested that exposure to RF radiation promotes the development of GBM.
NTP Near-Field Study: This study simulated full-body exposure to radiation at close proximity. The findings indicated that tumors develop from this exposure.
Ramazzini Far-Field Study: This study simulated exposure to radiation from cell phone towers at lower intensities but over a more extensive area. The results were consistent with the NTP study, showing a higher incidence of tumors in cells susceptible to cancer, such as Glial and Schwann cells.
The Rise of GBM Brain Tumors Globally
The incidence of GBM has been rising dramatically, particularly in the frontal and temporal regions of the brain, which are most exposed to cell phone radiation. Studies from England, the Netherlands, and the USA show a significant increase in GBM rates, while the rates for lower-grade tumors have decreased, masking the overall rise in GBM cases.
