In a recent breakthrough, researchers have successfully engineered a synthetic gene oscillator to slow cellular aging and promote longevity. The team, led by Lei Stanley Qi and Chao Tang at Stanford University, used computational biology to redesign gene circuits and map deteriorative processes in yeast cells. The oscillator became an “executable idea” in 2020 after the team identified the two main deteriorative processes that occur in the nucleus and mitochondria. The researchers believe that this process can eventually be applied to humans through gene therapy. If maintaining oscillations promotes balance in the cell and longevity on a universal scale, periodic pharmacological and nutritional interventions may also be developed. Howard Salis, an associate professor of biological and chemical engineering at Penn State University, notes that human cells contain similar age-committing genetic circuitry, making the same method of rewiring a possibility. The team’s recent study on “Engineering longevity” was published in the journal Science and includes researchers Zhen Zhou, Yuting Liu, Yushen Feng, Stephen Klepin, Lev Tsimring, Lorraine Pillus, and Jeff Hasty.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- RFK Jr On Devastating Fertility and Teen Cancers Misses Mark On Wireless Radiation Fueling The Crisis April 9, 2025
- RF Safe’s firm stance toward others in the EMF safety industry – Do it right or step aside! April 9, 2025
- Why I Deleted My EMF Summit Posts: A Personal Mission and a Promise Fulfilled April 7, 2025
- The Silent Risk: Mobile and Cordless Phones Linked to Increased Prostate Cancer Rates April 7, 2025
- The Missing Current: Supporting Michael Levin While Calling for a Broader View on EMFs April 5, 2025
- The Schumann Resonance and Human Health: Understanding Our Ancient Electromagnetic Sensory System April 5, 2025
- A Convergence of Calm: Why the Brain’s Alpha Rhythm May Be Proof of Electromagnetic Adaptation April 4, 2025
- The Schumann Resonance: Earth’s Natural Electromagnetic Symphony April 4, 2025
- Wireless Radiation: Regulatory vs Scientific Consensus April 4, 2025
- Why Moving Beyond Traditional Wi-Fi to Li-Fi Technology is the Future April 4, 2025
- Why So Many “Anti-Radiation” Phone Cases Get It Wrong—and How to Spot a Real Solution April 4, 2025
- Cell Phone Radiofrequency – NTP Board of Scientific Counselors Meeting – NIEHS April 3, 2025
- Melanie AI and the Future of Safe Learning: A New Model for Education Without Radiation April 2, 2025
- Melanie AI: A Fun Geometry Game with a Vital Warning for Parents April 2, 2025
- Exposing the Truth: The Fight Against Microwave Radiation and the Erosion of Our Rights April 2, 2025
- Life’s Hidden Code: How Bioelectrical Interfaces Are Revolutionizing Medicine April 2, 2025
- A Massive Problem All of Physics Completely Missed April 1, 2025
- The Radiation Lie: Why Your Phone Case Isn’t Enough and What You Must Do Now March 31, 2025
- You Can’t Buy Protection from a Lie March 31, 2025
- The Truth They Tried to Bury — But You’re Looking at It Now March 31, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →