The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for safeguarding the environment from damage caused by communication infrastructure. This mandate includes protecting wildlife and human health, preserving historic sites, and preventing aesthetic blight. However, when companies seek to add new cell phone towers, build on protected land, or launch satellites, the FCC typically does little or nothing to address the potential environmental impacts. The agency’s neglect of environmental protection is particularly concerning as it presides over a nationwide buildout for 5G service, which will require 800,000 new “small cell” transmitters placed near schools, apartments, and homes. Despite this massive effort, the FCC has refused to revise its radiation-exposure limits and has cut back on required environmental reviews while restricting local governments’ control over wireless sites. Additionally, the agency’s approach is hands-off, delegating much of its responsibility to the industries it regulates and allowing companies to decide for themselves whether their projects require environmental study. In the rare instances in which the FCC investigates, even brazen illegality is often met with a minor fine or no action at all. The agency declined to make officials available for interviews for this article or to respond to questions sent in writing.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- Why RFK Jr. Should Lead HHS: Wireless Radiation Research Matters November 15, 2024
- Why We Need Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS): The Case for Restoring Wireless Radiation Research and Protecting Public Health November 15, 2024
- RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services: A New Era for Wireless Radiation Research and Public Health Reform November 15, 2024
- A Call for Change: Addressing the Health Risks of Wireless Radiation with RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services November 15, 2024
- Elon Musk’s Direct-to-Cell: Disrupting Legacy Wireless Like Twitter Did Legacy Media November 14, 2024
- Shared Probabilistic Networks in ceLLM November 14, 2024
- Part Two: Unveiling the Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation and the Need for Updated Guidelines November 13, 2024
- Brain Tumor Rates Are Rising in the US: The Role of Cell Phone & Cordless Phone Use November 13, 2024
- Beyond Vaccines: Why Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) are the Unseen Disruptors of Bioelectric Harmony November 13, 2024
- Anti-Vaxxers, It’s Time to Wake Up: The Hidden Pollution That Could Be Harming Your Children’s Development November 13, 2024
- New Findings on EMF’s Broader Impact on Neuronal Networks and Cognitive Functioning November 13, 2024
- UV Detection with QuantaDose 3rd Gen 6-in-1 UV Test Card November 12, 2024
- Could 6G Radiation Exposure Under US Safety Limits Damage Male Fertility? November 11, 2024
- The Dwindling Y Chromosome: Is Man-Made Entropic Waste Speeding Up Male Extinction? November 11, 2024
- Are EMFs Changing Developmental Milestones November 11, 2024
- Stephen Fry, Chrissie Hynde, and Sophie Winkleman Protest 5G Advertising on London’s Tube: Are We Ignoring the Hidden Dangers of Radiation? November 11, 2024
- Dr. Jeremy E. Kaslow, M.D. Endorsement Of SafeSleeve Laptop Radiation Shields Endangers Babies November 11, 2024
- RF Safe’s Founder John Coates Exposes Radiation Protection Scams: A 20-Year Commitment to Consumer Safety November 10, 2024
- Health Hazards of Space Travel: Insights from Quantum Biology November 10, 2024
- Mitochondria, Viral DNA, and Hybridization as Examples of DNA’s Adaptive Processing November 10, 2024
Recent Compares
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →