The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is responsible for safeguarding the environment from damage caused by communication infrastructure. This mandate includes protecting wildlife and human health, preserving historic sites, and preventing aesthetic blight. However, when companies seek to add new cell phone towers, build on protected land, or launch satellites, the FCC typically does little or nothing to address the potential environmental impacts. The agency’s neglect of environmental protection is particularly concerning as it presides over a nationwide buildout for 5G service, which will require 800,000 new “small cell” transmitters placed near schools, apartments, and homes. Despite this massive effort, the FCC has refused to revise its radiation-exposure limits and has cut back on required environmental reviews while restricting local governments’ control over wireless sites. Additionally, the agency’s approach is hands-off, delegating much of its responsibility to the industries it regulates and allowing companies to decide for themselves whether their projects require environmental study. In the rare instances in which the FCC investigates, even brazen illegality is often met with a minor fine or no action at all. The agency declined to make officials available for interviews for this article or to respond to questions sent in writing.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- Public Law 90-602 The Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 March 13, 2025
- Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Heightened Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) in Children and Adolescents March 12, 2025
- Metabolic Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Sleep Disruption Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Oxidative Stress and Chronic Inflammation from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Neuropsychiatric Risks Associated with Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Auditory and Visual Risks Associated with Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Environmental and Ecological Impacts of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Endocrine System Disruption from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Genetic and Epigenetic Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Reproductive and Developmental Health Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Neuropsychiatric Risks and Electrohypersensitivity from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Immune System Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Neurological and Cognitive Risks from Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Carcinogenic Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation (RFR) March 12, 2025
- Categorizing Research on Wireless Radiation: Comprehensive Overview of Key Studies March 12, 2025
- Virginia “Ellie” Farver on the Urgent Need to Address Wireless Radiation Exposure March 12, 2025
- Ellie Marks on the Critical Importance of Protecting Communities from Wireless Radiation March 12, 2025
Recent Compares
-
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
-
Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →