In a growing effort to protect children online, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups have been pushing for new safeguards against digital platforms that may worsen mental health issues for young users. However, federal efforts to pass children’s online safety protections have been stalled due to disagreements among House and Senate leaders. In response, state officials have rushed to fill the void with their own bills requiring tech companies to vet their products for risks to children before launching them. But these bills have faced broad opposition from tech trade groups, many of which are supported by big tech giants like Amazon, Google and Meta. These groups have deployed lobbyists to meet with key state officials, sent their leaders to testify in opposition to the efforts, and even fired off letters warning about the potentially catastrophic impact of the bills on user privacy and free speech online. Despite such opposition, supporters of the proposed legislation argue that these safeguards are necessary to prevent children from being exposed to addictive social media features and other harmful designs.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- A Red Herring – How the Biden White House Quietly Ended Critical Cancer Research December 20, 2024
- Not Alarmist, Just Realistic: The Evidence Behind Non-Thermal EMF Risks and Section 704’s Devastating Impact December 18, 2024
- How An Unconstitutional Law in 1996 Fuels School Shootings and Neurological Disorders December 18, 2024
- All Aligned: Autism, ADHD, Gender Dysphoria, and Even School Shooters—New Research Reinforces the Bioelectric Connection December 18, 2024
- School Shooters: Unintended Consequences of Section 704 of the 1996 Telecommunications Act December 17, 2024
- Transgenerational Trait Continuity Under Siege: EMFs, EDD, and the Rise of Autism, ADHD, Gender Dysphoria, and School Violence December 17, 2024
- Empathy Deficit Disorder: The Missing Piece in Understanding School Shooters and Our Wireless World December 17, 2024
- Is Wireless Radiation Damaging Your Child’s Prefrontal Cortex? December 17, 2024
- Wisconsin Shooter Natalie Lynn (Samantha) Rupnow December 16, 2024
- Microwave Radiation, Autism, ADHD, Gender Dysphoria, and Youth Violence: The Invisible Links We Can No Longer Ignore December 16, 2024
- Unseen Ties: Are Wireless EMFs Fueling the Rise in Autism, ADHD, Gender Dysphoria, and Youth Violence? December 16, 2024
- A Call for Urgent Research After the Abundant Life Christian School Tragedy December 16, 2024
- The Urgent Need for Policy Reform to Address Wireless Radiation Risks December 16, 2024
- The Overlooked Role of Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) in Circadian Rhythms and Biological Health December 15, 2024
- The Great RF Radiation Betrayal: How the WHO, ICNIRP, and Captured Regulators Endanger Public Health and Our Children’s Future December 14, 2024
- Exposed and Ignored: The WHO’s Shameless Exclusion of Real-World Wireless Risks December 14, 2024
- The Great Wireless Cover-Up: How Key Health Research Is Being Systematically Excluded December 14, 2024
- A Critical Response to ICNIRP’s “Data Gaps” Statement December 13, 2024
- Academia, Industry, and Regulatory Agencies: The Unholy Trinity Hiding RF Radiation Risks from the World December 13, 2024
- Why the World Health Organization’s EMF Project is a Captured Agency December 13, 2024
Recent Compares
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →