In a growing effort to protect children online, policymakers and consumer advocacy groups have been pushing for new safeguards against digital platforms that may worsen mental health issues for young users. However, federal efforts to pass children’s online safety protections have been stalled due to disagreements among House and Senate leaders. In response, state officials have rushed to fill the void with their own bills requiring tech companies to vet their products for risks to children before launching them. But these bills have faced broad opposition from tech trade groups, many of which are supported by big tech giants like Amazon, Google and Meta. These groups have deployed lobbyists to meet with key state officials, sent their leaders to testify in opposition to the efforts, and even fired off letters warning about the potentially catastrophic impact of the bills on user privacy and free speech online. Despite such opposition, supporters of the proposed legislation argue that these safeguards are necessary to prevent children from being exposed to addictive social media features and other harmful designs.
Research News Archives
SAR Links
Archives
Recent Posts
- New Study Supports RFK Jr.’s Claim: WiFi Affects the Blood-Brain Barrier – More Research Is Needed! November 16, 2024
- Effects of 1800 MHz and 2100 MHz Mobile Phone Radiation on the Blood-Brain Barrier of New Zealand Rabbits: A Comprehensive Analysis November 16, 2024
- The Real Conspiracy: Legacy Media’s False Narrative on Cell Phone Radiation Safety November 16, 2024
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr.: Defending Science Against Forbes and the ACS November 16, 2024
- Hidden Impact of Cell Phone Radiation on Metabolism and Weight Gain November 15, 2024
- New Research Links 5G Radiation to Brain Changes in Rats: Connecting the Dots with U.S. Studies on ADHD and Autism November 15, 2024
- COSMOS-France Study Highlights Urgent Need for U.S. Policy Action on Mobile Phone Radiation November 15, 2024
- COSMOS-France: Pioneering Insights into Mobile Phone Radiation and Public Health Policy November 15, 2024
- The End of Debate: RF Radiation Health Risks Are Real November 15, 2024
- Why Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as HHS Secretary Should Follow France’s Lead on Wireless Radiation Regulation November 15, 2024
- Why RFK Jr. Should Lead HHS: Wireless Radiation Research Matters November 15, 2024
- Why We Need Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS): The Case for Restoring Wireless Radiation Research and Protecting Public Health November 15, 2024
- RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services: A New Era for Wireless Radiation Research and Public Health Reform November 15, 2024
- A Call for Change: Addressing the Health Risks of Wireless Radiation with RFK Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services November 15, 2024
- Elon Musk’s Direct-to-Cell: Disrupting Legacy Wireless Like Twitter Did Legacy Media November 14, 2024
- Shared Probabilistic Networks in ceLLM November 14, 2024
- Part Two: Unveiling the Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation and the Need for Updated Guidelines November 13, 2024
- Brain Tumor Rates Are Rising in the US: The Role of Cell Phone & Cordless Phone Use November 13, 2024
- Beyond Vaccines: Why Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) are the Unseen Disruptors of Bioelectric Harmony November 13, 2024
- Anti-Vaxxers, It’s Time to Wake Up: The Hidden Pollution That Could Be Harming Your Children’s Development November 13, 2024
Recent Compares
- Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Plus SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Plus SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SAR Levels vs Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Apple iPhone 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S23 SAR Levels View Comparison →
- Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max vs Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max SAR Levels View Comparison →