Cell Phone Radiation Policy

Advocating for Public Health and Safety

Rats: Is There a Connection? RF Safe: Championing Safe Technology Open Letter to President Trump Open Letter to Elon Musk RFK Jr. on Cell Phone Radiation Updated RF Radiation Safety Standards Smartphone Radiation Protection Heightened Sensitivities to EMFs Cell Phone Radiation Policy Laptop Radiation Shields RF Safe Approved Anti-Radiation Phone Case RF Safe Approved Phone Case Review Phone Clubs RF Safe Phone Club Review Press Release

Welcome to RF Safe—a movement that has been online at the forefront of protecting public health since the 1990s. For over two decades, we have been dedicated to safeguarding the well-being of future generations by addressing critical, nonpartisan issues that have been overlooked for too long. Our mission is backed by decades of advocacy and research into the health risks of electromagnetic radiation. Today, the latest scientific studies confirm that the debate over cell phone radiation hazards is settled—it’s time for decisive action. Vote for the well-being of our children.

YouTube Video Thumbnail

Candidate Stances: Know Where They Stand

Every election presents a critical opportunity to influence policy on these issues. We are compiling information on where candidates stand regarding RF-EMF safety, FCC reform, and support for scientific research.

Understanding where candidates stand on RF-EMF safety and research is vital for voters concerned about public health and technological advancement. Comparing the stances of Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is critical for the health of our children.

In the meantime, we encourage you to directly ask candidates about their plans to address these urgent matters.

YouTube Video Thumbnail

1. Update FCC Safety Guidelines: Embrace Modern Science

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) continues to rely on outdated safety guidelines that were established in the 1990s. These guidelines only consider the thermal effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF)—the heating of tissue when exposed to radiation. However, recent peer-reviewed studies have conclusively demonstrated that non-thermal biological effects—such as DNA damage, oxidative stress, and cellular dysfunction—pose significant health risks, particularly to vulnerable populations like children.

Why This Matters:

Our Demand:

The FCC must immediately update its safety guidelines to reflect current scientific understanding. This means incorporating both thermal and non-thermal effects to adequately protect public health. By enforcing stricter safety standards, the FCC will compel manufacturers to develop safer technologies, which is critical for the health of future generations.

2. Restart National Toxicology Program (NTP) Cancer Research Ended Under Biden-Harris

The National Toxicology Program's (NTP) groundbreaking research on RF radiation was one of the most comprehensive efforts to date to understand the health impacts of long-term exposure to wireless technology. The study found clear evidence of carcinogenic effects, yet despite its importance, the Biden-Harris administration abruptly halted funding for this critical research, leaving a dangerous void in our understanding of RF radiation’s impact on human health.

Why This Matters:

Our Demand:

We call for the immediate restoration of funding and support for the NTP’s research. Without this critical work, we are left without the full understanding of the health implications of RF-EMF exposure, which is vital for crafting informed policy decisions. Continued research will also pave the way for safer technological advancements that protect public health.

3. End FCC Regulatory Capture: Prioritize Public Health Over Profits

For decades, regulatory capture has allowed industry interests to exercise undue influence over the FCC, resulting in policies that favor corporate profits over public safety. Industry insiders within regulatory positions create conflicts of interest that prevent the FCC from acting in the best interest of public health. This has led to the unchecked proliferation of wireless technologies without adequate safety standards.

Why This Matters:

Our Demand:

The FCC must implement measures to eliminate industry influence and ensure that public health and safety are the primary considerations in all regulatory decisions. This includes enforcing transparent, science-based policymaking and ensuring that future FCC leadership has no ties to the industries they are tasked with regulating. Only then can we rebuild public trust and protect future generations from unnecessary health risks.

Take Action Now: Your Voice Can Make a Difference

The urgency of these issues cannot be overstated. Scientific evidence underscores the need for immediate action to protect our health and that of future generations. Here's how you can help:

RF Safe was established not as a commercial enterprise but as a platform to raise awareness about EMF exposure. Coates aims to educate the public on how to reduce risks through practical measures and advocates for updated safety guidelines that reflect current scientific understanding.

For more information, contact John Coates at 727-610-1188.