TruthCase™ — the case for real protection from non‑native EMFs
RF SAFE pioneered exposure‑reduction cases in the 1990s. TruthCase™ is built to reduce everyday microwave exposure without gimmicks, and it lays out the full roadmap: design that obeys physics, usage that actually lowers dose, and policy that finally aligns technology with biology.
The Case for Truth—because people are tired of being sold “99%” fairy tales
TruthCase™ exists to make the difference obvious: physics‑first design, transparent usage guidance, and a public roadmap that ends the problem indoors (LiFi) and fixes safety oversight where the law already says it belongs.
What you need to know now
Design choices change exposure
Magnets, metal loops, plate steel, and thick wallet stacks can detune antennas and make phones transmit harder. TruthCase™ avoids those traps and keeps the shield where it matters: between you and the phone.
Non‑thermal effects are real
The literature describes a coherent pathway: VGIC/VGCC disruption → Ca²⁺ dysregulation → oxidative stress → DNA damage. That’s why we reduce duty cycle and proximity wherever possible.
Law is lagging—by mandate, not choice
Public Law 90‑602 requires HHS to run an electronic product radiation control program. With NTP’s RF work shut down and no successor program, HHS is not fulfilling the statute. Section 704 preempts communities from citing health; it must be fixed.
There’s a clean exit path
LiFi (IEEE 802.11bb) moves indoor connectivity to light, with privacy and no microwave burden. TruthCase™ helps now; the roadmap finishes the job.
Wireless radiation, cancer, fertility & mechanism: what the totality shows
U.S. limits are still thermal‑only (1996). The fix is law and oversight: enforce EPRC (Public Law 90‑602), restore local authority, and move indoor connectivity toward LiFi.
Different on purpose
Most “anti‑radiation” cases add convenience hardware that raises output. TruthCase™ follows physics.
Design
Directional shielding between you & phone. No metal loops, magnets, or plate steel. Ear‑side continuity.
Usage
Habits that matter: call posture, pocket orientation, night distance, turning off radios you don’t need.
Roadmap
Light‑based networking and updated law—so homes and schools rely more on light and less on microwaves.
The four truths the market ignores
Truth #1 — Unshielded ear‑side holes break protection where you need it most
Large ear‑aligned apertures are a direct path for higher‑frequency signals and defeat continuity in calls. TruthCase™ keeps a shielded ear‑side path.
Truth #2 — Detachable magnets & steel plates make phones shout
They detune antennas. Power‑control ramps up output to hold the link—more exposure, not less. TruthCase™ excludes magnets, plates, and thick wallet stacks.
Truth #3 — Metal loops and hardware near antennas detune the system
Conductive loops near radiators alter near‑field behavior and degrade efficiency. Phones respond by transmitting harder. TruthCase™ has no metal loops and stays thin where radios live.
Truth #4 — “99% protection” fabric numbers ≠ your life
A swatch is not your duty cycle. Reduction comes from shield placement, antenna behavior, and how long radios are active. We refuse “99% everywhere.”
The evidence, straight
Cancer
- INTERPHONE: top decile (≥1,640 h) ≈ OR 1.40 for glioma (~30 min/day over 10y).
- NTP: clear evidence of heart schwannomas (male rats); some for gliomas; DNA damage.
- Ramazzini: far‑field ~0.1 W/kg → more heart schwannomas and glial tumors.
- WHO‑commissioned 2025: animal evidence High for glioma & heart schwannoma.
Reproduction & development
- Male fertility: pooled OR 1.68 for decreased pregnancy rate; motility/morphology detriments; oxidative stress at non‑thermal levels.
- Prenatal/offspring: fetal/placental oxidative stress; behavioral changes across multiple labs.
- Mechanistic match: mitochondrial strain, hormone signaling disruption, ROS‑mediated DNA damage.
Mechanism
Polarized, pulsed RFR → VGIC/VGCC interference → Ca²⁺ influx → ROS → DNA damage. Explains tumor types, fertility effects, and prenatal outcomes.
Population
Denmark’s registry shows increasing brain/CNS tumor rates through 2023, with the sharpest jump 2021→2023. Public health acts on converging evidence; it doesn’t wait for a mythical single “perfect” study.
Law & mandate: this is not optional
Public Law 90‑602 (EPRC)
Mandate: HHS shall run an electronic product radiation control program—research and performance standards for electronic products (including wireless). With NTP’s RF work shut down and no successor program, HHS is not fulfilling the statute.
Fix (now)
- Reconstitute a national RF research program with non‑thermal endpoints.
- Promulgate performance standards (duty‑cycle controls, labeling, child margins).
- Seat RF health oversight at HHS/FDA/NIH with EPA; keep FCC on spectrum engineering.
Section 704 (1996)
Preempts communities from citing health in siting decisions if FCC limits are met—functionally muting the First & Tenth Amendments for nearly three decades. It must be repealed/repaired.
We had the evidence before 1996
- 1971 U.S. Navy bibliography → hundreds of RF bioeffects papers.
- Allan Frey → microwave hearing & blood‑brain barrier effects.
- Arthur Guy → foundational RF dosimetry.
- Lai & Singh (1995/96) → DNA strand breaks at low intensities.
- CTIA/WTR era → internal “war‑gaming” of unfavorable findings.
Non‑thermal effects were documented. Thermal‑only limits remain a policy choice, not a scientific necessity.
Clean Ether roadmap
Home & school (now)
- Phones off‑body; speaker/air‑tubes; shorten on‑head calls.
- Wire it where possible; LiFi (802.11bb) for indoor wireless.
- Keep routers away from sleeping areas; schedule overnight off.
- Prefer text/async; download then offline for media.
Institutions
- LiFi for classrooms, libraries, clinics, aircraft cabins.
- Buffer RF facilities from play areas; shut school small‑cells after hours.
- Buy low‑power APs with sleep modes by default.
Nation
- Enforce EPRC; restart federal RF research now.
- Protective standards for pulsed/modulated signals, cumulative dose, child margins.
- Repeal/repair Section 704; restore community authority.
- Adopt a Clean Ether Act: optical indoors by default, RF for mobility.
Subject: Enforce EPRC (Public Law 90‑602), restore local authority, and move RF health oversight to HHS/EPA
Please:
1) Direct HHS to immediately execute its non‑discretionary EPRC mandate (21 U.S.C. §360hh–ss): research and performance standards for electronic product radiation, including wireless. With NTP’s RF program shut down and no successor executing EPRC scope, HHS is not in compliance.
2) Move RF health oversight to HHS/FDA/NIH with EPA as co‑regulator. Keep FCC on spectrum engineering and auctions, not health.
3) Repeal/repair Section 704 of the 1996 Telecom Act to restore First & Tenth Amendment rights so communities can protect schools and neighborhoods.
4) Modernize RF exposure standards to address pulsed/modulated signals, cumulative exposures, children’s susceptibility, and whole‑body low‑level fields. Mandate LiFi (IEEE 802.11bb) for indoor networks where cost‑effective, reserving RF for mobility.
The evidence is sufficient to act: high‑exposure epidemiology, two concordant animal bioassays, a WHO‑commissioned review rating animal evidence High for glioma and heart schwannoma, robust oxidative‑stress/DNA‑damage mechanisms, and rising population signals.
How to use TruthCase™
- Calls: answer/start, then close the cover toward your head; use speaker or wired for long calls.
- Pocket: shielded cover toward your body (back pocket often best).
- Night: distance or airplane mode; keep phones away from heads and children’s beds.
- Duty cycle: turn off radios you don’t need (Wi‑Fi, Bluetooth, hotspot).
Protection = design + practice. TruthCase™ enables the practice to work.
Why thin matters
Over‑thick “armor” near antenna zones degrades efficiency and makes phones transmit harder. TruthCase™ stays deliberately slim and antenna‑aware so the phone can do the same job with less output.
Not anti‑radiation. Pro‑truth.
Verify your shield in 60 seconds
What you need
- Any basic ohmmeter / multimeter
- Your TruthCase™ (front cover open)
Steps
- Touch one probe to the exposed test point at the ear‑side speaker aperture.
- Touch the other probe to a second point on the cover’s shielding layer.
- You should see a low‑resistance path (conductive mesh continuity). That’s your verifiable shield.
The Truth Standard™
| Principle | Meaning | TruthCase™ Position |
|---|---|---|
| Shield the person, not the phone | Place the shield between you & the source during calls and pocket carry. | Front cover toward head/body; directional use is the point. |
| Keep antennas efficient | Avoid obstructing/detuning radiators (which triggers power boosts). | No metal loops, no magnets, no plate steel; thin near antenna zones. |
| Continuity at the ear | Don’t break the shield path with a large ear‑aligned aperture. | Shielded ear‑side path; continuity in call posture. |
| Field behavior > fabric % | Measure outcomes in real use, not swatch percentages. | No “99% everywhere” claims; we teach correct use. |
| Verifiable materials | Let people confirm a conductive shield path. | Ohmmeter‑checkable access in the front cover. |
What leaders are telling parents
Keep phones off kids’ bodies: avoid pockets and on‑head calls; use speaker or wired instead.
Note: Replace the quote text/source in the small variables at the top of the script for an exact attributed citation.
Quick answers
Does it “block 99%”?
No slogans. Real‑world reduction depends on placement, antenna behavior, and duty cycle. We teach the practice that lowers exposure; we don’t promise swatch numbers.
Why avoid magnets/loops/plates?
They obstruct/detune antennas; the phone compensates by transmitting harder. That raises exposure—exactly what we’re reducing.
Is TruthCase™ QuantaCase®?
Yes. TruthCase™ is QuantaCase® by RF SAFE—built to expose design flaws, reduce exposure today, and lead the policy shift we need.
Where do the links go?
Pick a model to see Buy on Amazon (if an ASIN exists) and Buy Now (direct). Everything is from truthcases.json so affiliates can re‑use this page.
The only case for your phone should be a TruthCase™
A case should reduce exposure in real use—without making your phone transmit harder and without “99% everywhere” claims. TruthCase™ is built for physics, for people, and for a future where indoor connectivity relies more on light and less on microwaves.
TruthCase™ is QuantaCase® by RF SAFE.
About the numbers you’re about to see
In 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit remanded the FCC’s decision to keep its 1996 RF exposure limits, calling the agency’s explanation “arbitrary and capricious.” Petitioners included Environmental Health Trust and Children’s Health Defense. The court faulted the FCC for failing to address evidence on non‑cancer harms, children, modern signals, whole‑body and long‑term exposures. (opinion · FCC case page)
Where today’s limits came from. The FCC’s 1996 rules (codified in 47 CFR § 1.1310) were built from ANSI/IEEE C95.1‑1992 (with lineage back to 1982) and NCRP Report No. 86 (1986). Those documents are thermal frameworks: they aim to prevent short‑term tissue heating. The heritage averaging window is on the order of ~6 minutes for localized exposure; the FCC operationalizes this as a 1.6 W/kg SAR averaged over 1 gram of tissue for portable devices, while ICNIRP’s international scheme uses 10 g/6 min. See also the FCC’s guidance in OET RF Safety/OET Bulletins.
Why that matters now. In the same year (1996), Congress enacted Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act (47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7)), which preempts local governments from denying antennas “on the basis of the environmental effects of RF emissions” if FCC limits are met. The practical result: communities are bound to 1990s thermal‑only limits, even as decades of peer‑reviewed evidence report non‑thermal biological effects (e.g., oxidative stress, DNA damage, fertility impacts). Treat the SAR values below as an official compliance number—not a complete measure of biological safety.
Sources: D.C. Circuit (2021) · FCC OET RF Safety · 47 CFR § 1.1310 · 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(7) · More references on non‑thermal effects
Quick SAR Comparison
References & links
- INTERPHONE heavy‑use ≈30 min/day; glioma OR 1.40: IARC
- Corporate‑subscription exclusion issue: EHP / PMC
- NTP cell‑phone RFR: NTP
- Ramazzini (Falcioni 2018): PubMed • ScienceDirect
- WHO‑commissioned animal review (2025): BfS Spotlight • DOI: Environment International
- Male fertility SR (2024) + corrigendum (2025): PubMed • ScienceDirect
- Pregnancy/birth outcomes + BfS note: PubMed • BfS
- Oxidative stress review: Yakymenko 2015
- Mechanism review (Int J Oncol 2021): PubMed
- Mechanistic synthesis (2025): Frontiers
- Denmark CNS trends: 2023 • 2024
- 47 U.S.C. §332(c)(7): Cornell LII
- Public Law 90‑602 • FDA EPRC: Congress.gov • FDA
- EHT v. FCC (2021 remand): FCC • Opinion
- LiFi standard: IEEE 802.11bb
Educational content and engineering advice.