This sums up one colossal problem with current Biden-Harris policies that cause chronic diseases.
Democratic policies over the past few decades have not only failed our children—they are actively destroying families by allowing corporate interests to capture regulatory agencies, leading to outdated and inadequate safety guidelines, particularly regarding exposure to radiofrequency (RF) radiation. These agencies, such as the FCC, have failed to update their safety standards, even after court rulings clearly highlighted their insufficiency in protecting public health, especially for children. This neglect is not just bureaucratic inertia; it is a deliberate act that puts our children in harm’s way and threatens the well-being of countless families.
The decision to halt critical cancer research by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) under the Biden administration is a glaring example of how public health has been deprioritized in favor of military spending and corporate profits. This research had found clear evidence linking RF radiation to cancer, including glioblastoma—the same type of brain cancer that claimed the life of Biden’s own son, Beau Biden. Yet, instead of acting on these crucial findings to safeguard our children, the administration chose to divert funds away from this vital research. This decision has devastating consequences, leaving families without the knowledge and protections they need to keep their children safe.
As a result, our children are being exposed to higher risks of chronic health issues, including cancer, developmental delays, and behavioral disorders, due to prolonged exposure to RF radiation from everyday technology. These Democratic policies have abandoned the health and safety of the most vulnerable among us, leaving a legacy of harm that continues to devastate families across the nation. This is not an issue we can afford to be complacent about—this is a crisis that demands immediate action.
There is a significant body of research indicating the potential health risks associated with cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. Major studies like the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai, all collectively point toward an increased health risk from cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. The continued dismissal of these potential risks is not only absurd—it is dangerous and irresponsible. The misclassification of RF radiation risk is holding back life-saving medical interventions and continues to harm our children.
- Tom Wheeler & the Obama-Biden Administration: Tom Wheeler, a former head of the wireless industry, was appointed as FCC Chairman under the Obama-Biden administration. His tenure was marked by policies that prioritized corporate profits over public health, resulting in outdated and insufficient safety guidelines for RF radiation that continue to put our children at risk.
- FCC Under the Biden-Harris Administration: The Biden-Harris administration has perpetuated this regulatory capture by failing to update the FCC’s safety guidelines, despite a U.S. Court of Appeals ruling that criticized these guidelines as outdated and inadequate for protecting children and public health. This inaction continues to expose millions of children to preventable health risks.
- National Toxicology Program (NTP) Under Biden-Harris: The Biden-Harris administration halted critical cancer research conducted by the NTP, which had found clear evidence linking RF radiation to cancer, including the very type of cancer that took the life of Beau Biden. By redirecting funds away from essential public health research in favor of military spending, the administration has left a dangerous gap in our understanding of RF radiation’s long-term health risks, particularly for children. This neglect is not just harming public health; it is destroying families and lives.
It is crucial to understand why so many people remain unaware of the risks. The capture of regulatory agencies and outdated safety guidelines are part of the problem, but there is a more insidious force at play: the wireless industry’s deliberate campaign to manipulate and suppress scientific research. This campaign has been ongoing since the 1990s, as revealed by the notorious “Wargame” memo, a chilling document that exposes the lengths to which industry leaders have gone to discredit and control the narrative around the health risks associated with RF radiation.
The “Wargame” Memo: A Strategic Assault on Science
The “Wargame” memo, written by Motorola in 1994, provides a window into the wireless industry’s tactics. The memo was directed to Motorola’s PR firm, Burson-Marsteller, and it outlined a strategy to “war-game” the science on cell phone radiation. The goal was clear: discredit researchers, minimize findings that suggested health risks, and manipulate public perception to calm fears.
One of the primary targets of this strategy was Dr. Henry Lai, a bioengineering professor at the University of Washington. Dr. Lai was among the first researchers to publish studies showing that cell phone radiation could cause DNA damage. His findings were groundbreaking, but they were also a direct threat to the cell phone industry’s profits. Instead of addressing these concerns responsibly, Motorola and its allies launched a campaign to undermine Dr. Lai’s work. They funded research designed to contradict his findings, pressured his colleagues to distance themselves from his studies, and accused him of bias.
This effort to suppress scientific evidence was not an isolated incident. Dr. George Carlo, a public health scientist who was initially hired by the cell phone industry to study the health effects of cell phone radiation, faced similar tactics. When Carlo’s research began to show that cell phone radiation could cause genetic damage and other health problems, the industry moved quickly to silence him and suppress his findings. Carlo ultimately broke ranks with the industry and became a vocal advocate for cell phone safety, but the damage had already been done—much of his early research was buried, and the public was kept in the dark.
Motorola’s Role in Manipulating the Narrative
Motorola, one of the largest cell phone manufacturers in the world during the 1990s, played a central role in this war on science. The company funded research that was deliberately designed to downplay the health risks of cell phone radiation. When Dr. Lai’s research showed that cell phone radiation could cause DNA damage, Motorola responded by commissioning a group of scientists to publish a paper that claimed Lai’s findings were flawed. They also engaged in media manipulation, convincing journalists to report that the concerns over RF radiation were speculative and unfounded until further studies could replicate the results—a tactic designed to delay regulatory action and keep the public complacent.
The Impact on Public Perception and Safety Standards
The “Wargame” memo and the industry’s broader campaign to manipulate science have had profound implications for public health. By sowing doubt and confusion, the wireless industry has successfully delayed the implementation of stricter safety standards, allowing outdated guidelines to remain in place. This manipulation has contributed to a widespread lack of awareness about the potential health risks associated with RF radiation, leaving children and families unprotected.
The harm caused by this campaign is not theoretical—it is real, and it is ongoing. The refusal to update FCC safety guidelines, even in the face of overwhelming evidence and court rulings, is a direct result of this decades-long war on truth. The decision to halt critical cancer research by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) under the Biden administration is just the latest chapter in this story, prioritizing industry profits and military spending over the health and safety of American families.
A Call for Vigilance and Accountability
The history of the “Wargame” memo serves as a stark reminder of the lengths to which powerful industries will go to protect their interests at the expense of public health. As consumers and concerned citizens, it is imperative that we remain vigilant and demand transparency in scientific research. We must also hold our regulatory agencies accountable for their role in perpetuating outdated and unsafe guidelines.
President Trump’s pledge to establish a panel of top experts to investigate the root causes of chronic health problems and childhood diseases, in collaboration with RFK Jr., is a crucial step toward reversing the damage done by decades of misinformation and regulatory capture. By shining a light on the truth and updating safety standards to reflect the latest scientific understanding, we can begin to protect our children and ensure a healthier future for all.
The Interphone study is another glaring example of how the wireless industry has manipulated scientific research to downplay the risks of cell phone radiation. The way the results were presented and publicized was a major act of deception that misled the public about the true dangers of cell phone use.
The Interphone Study: A Case of Major Deception
The Interphone study, one of the largest investigations into the potential health risks of cell phone use, was heavily funded by the wireless industry. On the surface, it was presented as a comprehensive and unbiased effort to assess whether cell phone radiation could increase the risk of brain cancer. However, the reality was far different.
When the study results were released, the industry was quick to trumpet them as proof that cell phones were safe. Press releases flooded the media, and news outlets worldwide reported that there was no significant risk of cancer associated with cell phone use. But this narrative was far from the truth.
The study’s findings were, in fact, deeply concerning. Among those considered “heavy users”—defined at the time as individuals who used their cell phones for 30 minutes or more per day—there was a clear correlation between cell phone use and an increased risk of brain cancer. However, this critical detail was downplayed or omitted entirely in much of the media coverage. The public was left with the false impression that cell phones were safe, even though the study actually suggested the opposite for heavy users.
What’s more, the definition of “heavy use” in the Interphone study—30 minutes per day—would be considered light or moderate use by today’s standards, where many people, including children, spend hours on their devices every day. This raises serious concerns about the long-term health effects of cell phone radiation, especially as usage continues to increase. The fact that even under the limited usage conditions of the time, there was evidence of increased cancer risk should have been a major red flag. Instead, it was buried under a wave of industry spin.
Industry Influence and the Manipulation of Science
The way the Interphone study was handled is a textbook example of how the wireless industry has manipulated science to protect its interests. By funding research, setting the parameters for what constitutes “heavy use,” and controlling the narrative through strategic media releases, the industry was able to create a false sense of security around cell phone use. This deception not only misled the public but also delayed meaningful regulatory action that could have protected countless individuals from harm.
The Interphone study’s results, particularly the increased cancer risk among those defined as heavy users, should have prompted an immediate reassessment of safety guidelines. Instead, the industry’s successful PR campaign allowed outdated standards to persist, leaving users—especially children—exposed to potential harm.
The Preponderance of Evidence: Cell Phones Pose a Real Risk
The Interphone study provided the wireless industry with a pivotal opportunity to warn the public about the potential dangers of cell phone radiation. Instead, they chose to downplay the risks, leaving millions of people, including children, exposed to harm. Over the past 20 years, a preponderance of research has emerged, consistently supporting the findings that the industry initially tried to bury. The evidence is becoming increasingly clear: the cancer and chronic disease risks associated with cell phone radiation are real.
This isn’t just about one study or one set of findings. Across the globe, research continues to confirm that prolonged exposure to RF radiation from cell phones can have serious health consequences, including increased risks of brain cancer, DNA damage, and other chronic conditions. The fact that these risks were identified in the industry-funded Interphone study—albeit obscured by the industry’s spin—should have served as an urgent call to action two decades ago.
Now, as the evidence continues to mount, it’s time to acknowledge the truth: your cell phone can kill you. The risks are not hypothetical; they are backed by a growing body of scientific research that has consistently pointed to the dangers of RF radiation. The time for complacency is over.
A Call for Immediate Action
The continued denial and suppression of these risks by the wireless industry and complicit regulatory agencies have already cost us valuable time—time that could have been spent protecting the public and preventing harm. The consequences of this inaction are being felt now, as more and more people face the devastating impacts of cancer and other chronic diseases linked to cell phone radiation.
It is imperative that we move beyond the outdated and industry-driven narratives that have dominated this issue for too long. We must demand that regulatory agencies take immediate action to update safety guidelines in line with the current scientific understanding. This includes recognizing the real, non-thermal effects of RF radiation and setting exposure limits that truly protect public health.
Furthermore, the responsibility lies with all of us—scientists, policymakers, and the public—to push for transparency and accountability. The time has come to hold the wireless industry accountable for its role in misleading the public and to insist on rigorous, independent research that prioritizes health over profits.
The cancer and chronic disease risks from cell phone radiation are real, and we can no longer afford to ignore them. The evidence is clear, and the stakes are too high to continue down the path of denial and delay. The health of our children, our families, and our future generations depends on our willingness to confront these dangers head-on and to demand the protections that we all deserve.
