Plausible Deniability and Responsibility:
- Argument: A leader, especially a Commander-in-Chief, should not rely on plausible deniability to escape responsibility for their words. They must recognize the potential impact their words can have, especially when addressing a large audience.
- Example: When President Biden said, “It’s time to put Trump in a bullseye,” the words can be interpreted literally by those lacking compassion or prone to violence, even if the intended meaning was metaphorical or political.
- Argument: Political leaders have a responsibility to consider the full spectrum of how their words might be received and acted upon by their audience. This includes those who may interpret statements literally or with violent intent.
- Case Study: The example of President Biden’s statement illustrates the absolute danger of using metaphorical language that can be taken literally.
Impact of Words in Large Audiences:
- Argument: In a large audience, statistically, there is a high chance that someone might take extreme actions based on the leader’s words. This necessitates a higher level of caution and clarity in communication.
- Example: The event described demonstrates that among a large group, there will be individuals who act on the literal interpretation of metaphorical statements, leading to unintended and harmful consequences.
I’ll be working all night to update the tribute site code so these victims can be added to LibertyUnites. They are all victims of Joe Biden’s Terror Rhetoric. May the Lord God bring comfort to all those suffering from this attack instigated by the Biden regime
tributes/tributecategory.php">![](https://www.rfsafe.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/image_2024_07_08T15_42_42_947Z-800x286.png)
Soldiers
US Air Force
US Army
US Navy
Sept 911
World Trade Center