To those uncertain about RF Safe’s firm stance toward others in the EMF safety industry:
It’s not about personal attacks or ill will. I firmly believe that misinformation can be more dangerous than the radiation itself. When I see misleading claims, especially from those who say they’re doing good, I feel a moral obligation to confront them. The following message—originally shared in a tweet—explains why accuracy is so critical and clarifies the principles behind my work.
Original Tweet Content
I have no ill will towards anyone. I confront words and actions that mislead or harm people, so it’s up to the individual if they take that personally. It’s the difference between the guy who builds the things versus sells the things.
But any good salesman knows he needs to have his facts right, so he was very receptive. There is a lot at stake for everyone. I think The EMF Guy understands this now.
When you design a technology, no matter what—light, microwave, or information-based—you have to understand the physics and underlying truths. Things don’t build out well based on assumptions. First principles are imperative and must include biological impacts regarding entropic waste.
I design, build, and manufacture to challenge myself to reduce entropic waste to fulfill a promise.
I have never designed or patented technology to make money; I only create things so people can see what is wrong with the technology they have.
RF Safe was the first to make many popular EMF safety accessories on the market today.
And I stopped making them when people finally came to market copying not only the product but RF Safe’s design principles. This is different than just copying a product when it loses sight of the principles. As SafeSleeve and Defender Shield have both done with detachable anti-radiation cases and misleading claims.
There are so many more important things than phone cases, but until they are made correctly and the anti-radiation phone case manufacturers remove misleading statements, I have no choice but to create a product that points out the flaws in their anti-radiation designs and marketing.
So it stands true—it seems like I’m only attacking those claiming to be doing good within the EMF safety community or the ones doing outright harm.
Misdirection within the community can be devastating for our goals and cost valuable time that can actually save lives. We must not be cheerful about distractions or cater to redirection. Stay focused on what really needs to be done. Everyone can be a part of the solution.
Let’s work together!
-
Demand a Repeal of Section 704 of TCA
-
Demand Enforcement of PL 90-602
-
Demand RFR Safety Guidance is returned to EPA
-
Demand LiFi Compatibility
That’s how we close the door on the microwave age and embrace the light age!
Everyone must understand these four things! It should be included every time you talk about providing solutions to nnEMFs because our world doesn’t get healthier until these demands are met.
Closing Note
My goal has always been to highlight misinformation and encourage scientifically sound principles in the EMF safety industry. When we work from a place of truth and integrity, we can truly protect people and pave the way for healthier technology. Let’s stay focused on what really needs to be done—and do it together.
