In a monumental shift in the 2024 presidential race, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has made the agonizing decision to suspend his campaign and throw his support behind Donald Trump. In a deeply personal and spiritual address, Kennedy outlined the reasons for this decision, emphasizing his commitment to ending the chronic disease crisis in America, restoring national health, and unifying the country around the most fundamental of values: the love for our children.
This blog will digs into the key points of RFK Jr.’s speech, explore the critical issues he raised, and explain why he believes supporting Donald Trump is the best path forward for America.
A Heart-Wrenching Decision: Why RFK Jr. Chose to Support Trump.
“I Am Not Terminating My Campaign, I Am Simply Suspending It”
RFK Jr. began his address by clarifying that he is not terminating his campaign but suspending it. This decision, he explained, was made after deep prayer and logical consideration. He recognized that remaining on the ballot in battleground states could lead to a Democratic win—something he believes would be detrimental to the causes he has championed for decades. RF Safe publically announced it had to support Trump over Kennedy on July 15th, 2024. From that point forward, RF Safe has made several posts pleading for Trump to embrace RFK battels. Along with praying for the same every night! This announcement by Kennedy proves God hears our prayers!
Kennedy’s commitment to solving the chronic disease crisis caused by wireless radiation, reforming food production, and making Americans healthy again drove him to this decision. He believes that under a potential President, Harris, the opportunity to address these issues would be lost forever to him. As the founder of RF Safe, I am in the same boat as Kennedy; I have spent 25 years of my life bringing awareness to the need to reclassify RFR radiation health risks for the sake of our children and future medical advances.
The Chronic Disease Crisis: A Central Issue for RFK Jr.
Kennedy has long been a vocal advocate for addressing the chronic disease crisis in America. He recounted how this issue was thrust upon him 20 years ago when he noticed the alarming rise in chronic illnesses among children—an issue largely ignored by the institutions meant to protect them. With 11 siblings and seven children of his own, Kennedy has seen firsthand the impact of chronic disease on families.
He believes that by supporting Trump, there is a real chance to reverse this crisis. “If President Trump is elected and honors his word, the vast burden of chronic disease that now demoralizes and bankrupts the country will disappear,” Kennedy stated. He promised that within two years, America could see a dramatic reduction in chronic disease, making the country healthier, stronger, and more resilient.
Biden-Harris Administration: Ending NTP Cancer Research on Wireless Radiation
A Dangerous Decision: Halting Critical Research
One of the most critical issues RFK Jr.. Will RFK address in his speech at tonight’s Trump rally in Phoenix, AZ, that the Biden-Harris administration’s decision to end funding for the National Toxicology Program (NTP) cancer research on wireless radiation? This research was pivotal in uncovering the dangers of radiofrequency radiation (RFR), particularly its links to cancer. The NTP’s findings showed clear evidence that long-term exposure to RFR could cause cancer, specifically glioblastoma—the same type of cancer that took the life of President Biden’s son, Beau Biden.
Kennedy has been a staunch advocate for this research, arguing that it is essential for protecting public health, especially for children who are more vulnerable to the effects of radiation. The decision to halt this research is, in Kennedy’s view, a grave mistake that puts Americans at risk by ignoring the potential dangers of wireless technology.
The FCC Lawsuit: RFK Jr. Takes on Regulatory Capture
Kennedy also highlighted his legal battles against the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). He successfully sued the FCC, arguing that its current safety regulations are outdated and do not adequately protect children from the dangers of wireless radiation. The court ruling in his favor was a significant victory, exposing the extent of regulatory capture where agencies like the FCC are influenced by the industries they are supposed to regulate.
Kennedy’s legal team presented compelling evidence that children, due to their developing bodies and thinner skulls, are more susceptible to the harmful effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF). This victory set the stage for potential policy changes, but Kennedy fears that under a Biden-Harris administration, the necessary reforms will never materialize.
Why RFK Jr. Believes Trump Will Follow Through
A Spiritual Journey: Choosing to Believe in Trump
Kennedy described his decision to support Trump as part of a spiritual journey. He reached this decision through deep prayer and logical reasoning, asking himself what choices he must make to maximize his chances of saving America’s children and restoring national health. He believes that Trump genuinely wants to address these issues and has promised that this will be his legacy.
“President Trump has told me that he wants this to be his legacy. I’m choosing to believe that this time he will follow through,” Kennedy stated. He acknowledged that this decision would be a difficult sacrifice for his family, but he is convinced that it is the right choice if there is even a small chance of saving America’s children from the chronic disease epidemic.
Unifying America: A Call to Love Our Children More Than We Hate Each Other
Kennedy emphasized that the only way to save the country and its children is if Americans choose to love their kids more than they hate each other. This message of unity is at the core of Kennedy’s decision to support Trump. He believes that by focusing on the values that unite us, particularly the love for our children, America can overcome its divisions and work towards a healthier, more prosperous future.
He recalled the legacy of his father and uncle, who inspired profound love for the country and unified Americans across racial and socio-economic lines. Kennedy’s hope is to bring that same spirit into the Trump campaign, moving away from vitriol and polarization and towards a national movement focused on common goals and shared values.
The Stakes Have Never Been Higher: Why You Should Support Trump
Protecting Our Children’s Future
RFK Jr. has made it clear that his decision to support Trump is driven by his commitment to protecting America’s children. He believes that under Trump’s leadership, there is a real opportunity to address the chronic disease crisis, reform food production, and restore national health. These are issues that Kennedy has dedicated his life to, and he is confident that Trump shares his commitment to making these changes.
Addressing the Dangers of Wireless Radiation
Kennedy’s fight against the dangers of wireless radiation is another critical reason he believes Trump is the right choice for America. The Biden-Harris administration’s decision to end NTP cancer research on wireless radiation is, in his view, a dangerous move that ignores the health risks associated with wireless technology. Kennedy trusts that Trump will prioritize this issue and ensure that the necessary research and reforms are carried out to protect public health.
A Call to Action: Uniting Around Shared Values
Kennedy’s final message in his speech was a call to action for all Americans. He urged voters to unite around the love for their children and to support Trump as the candidate who will prioritize their health and future. “If we all unite around that issue now, we can finally give them the protection, the health, and the future that they deserve,” Kennedy concluded.
RFK Jr.’s Endorsement of Trump – A Vote for Health, Unity, and the Future
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to suspend his campaign and endorse Donald Trump is a significant moment in the 2024 presidential race. His reasons are clear: he believes that Trump is the candidate best positioned to address the chronic disease crisis, protect America’s children, and restore national health. Kennedy’s commitment to these issues is unwavering, and he is confident that under Trump’s leadership, real change can be achieved.
For those who share Kennedy’s concerns about the future of America, his endorsement of Trump is a powerful call to action. It is a vote for health, unity, and a brighter future for the next generation. As RFK Jr. has made clear, the stakes have never been higher, and the time to act is now.
FAQs: Understanding the Risks of Cell Phone Radiation and the Importance of Updated Safety Guidelines
To help you understand the complex issues surrounding cell phone radiation, the FCC court case, and the halting of NTP research, we’ve compiled a list of frequently asked questions (FAQs). These FAQs aim to clarify the current state of scientific research, the legal battles, and why these issues are critical for public health.
1. What is the significance of the FCC court case won by RFK Jr.?
RFK Jr. successfully sued the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) over outdated safety guidelines for wireless radiation. The court ruled in favor of Kennedy, agreeing that the FCC’s regulations, which were last updated in 1996, do not adequately protect public health, especially the health of children. This victory is a crucial step toward updating the guidelines to reflect the latest scientific research on the risks of electromagnetic radiation.
2. Why did the Biden-Harris administration halt the NTP cancer research on wireless radiation?
The Biden-Harris administration ended funding for the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) research into the health effects of wireless radiation due to budget constraints. This decision is controversial because the NTP’s research was uncovering significant evidence that long-term exposure to radiofrequency radiation (RFR) could cause cancer, including glioblastoma, the same type of cancer that took the life of President Biden’s son, Beau Biden.
3. What does the current scientific research say about the health risks associated with cell phone radiation?
There is a substantial body of research indicating potential health risks associated with cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. Major studies such as the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, and the BioInitiative Report collectively point towards increased health risks, including cancer, from cell phone radiation. These studies challenge the outdated notion that non-ionizing radiation is biologically inert.
4. What are the key findings of the NTP and Ramazzini Institute studies?
Both the NTP and Ramazzini Institute studies provided groundbreaking evidence that long-term exposure to low-level RFR could cause cancer in animals. The NTP study found “clear evidence” of cancer in rats exposed to RFR, while the Ramazzini Institute replicated these findings, suggesting that the biological effects observed in animals could also occur in humans. These studies are crucial in understanding the risks associated with wireless technology.
5. How does RF-EMF treatment challenge the traditional view of non-ionizing radiation?
Advancements in RF radiation research, such as the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment, show that RF radiation can have biological effects beyond mere heating. TheraBionic uses RF radiation at power levels significantly lower than those emitted by cell phones to treat inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions at the cellular level. This treatment demonstrates that RF radiation can disrupt cellular signaling and modulate the immune system, challenging the outdated view that non-ionizing radiation is harmless.
6. Why is the reclassification of RFR risk important for medical advancements?
The misclassification of RFR as biologically inert except for its heating properties has held back life-saving medical interventions. Reclassifying RFR to acknowledge its potential biological effects could open the door to new therapeutic applications, such as RF-EMF treatment for cancer. Recognizing these effects is essential for developing safer technologies and better healthcare outcomes.
7. What are the implications of halting NTP research for public health?
Halting NTP research on wireless radiation leaves a significant gap in our understanding of the long-term health effects of RFR. Without this research, policymakers lack the data needed to develop effective strategies for reducing exposure and protecting public health. This decision could delay critical updates to safety guidelines and put millions of people at risk, especially children.
8. What is the role of regulatory capture in the FCC’s outdated guidelines?
Regulatory capture occurs when a regulatory agency, like the FCC, is influenced by the industries it is supposed to regulate. RFK Jr.’s lawsuit against the FCC exposed how the telecommunications industry has played a role in keeping safety guidelines outdated. This influence has prevented the adoption of new regulations that would better protect public health from the risks of wireless radiation.
9. What actions can be taken to update FCC guidelines and restart NTP research?
To protect public health, it is crucial to pressure the FCC to update its guidelines based on the latest scientific evidence. This includes recognizing the non-thermal effects of RF radiation and lowering exposure limits, particularly for children. Additionally, restarting NTP research is essential to fully understand the risks and develop strategies to mitigate them. Public advocacy and political pressure can help drive these changes.
10. Why is this issue considered one of the most crucial of our modern era?
The widespread use of wireless technology means that nearly everyone is exposed to some level of electromagnetic radiation. As research increasingly shows that this exposure could have serious health consequences, updating safety guidelines and continuing research is not just a health issue but a moral imperative. Protecting the health of future generations depends on acknowledging the risks and taking action now.
