Cancer cases in younger generations are continuing to rise at a disturbing rate, according to a massive new study from the American Cancer Society (ACS). The analysis considers the health data of more than 23 million US patients, born between 1920 and 1990, who were later diagnosed with cancer from 2000 to 2019. Compared to baby boomers, researchers found Gen Xers and millennials are at a higher risk of developing 17 out of 34 considered cancers, including leukemia, breast cancer, and gastric cancer.
Health Risks: Cancer Trends and Non-Thermal Effects of EMR
Additionally, a significant body of research indicates potential health risks associated with cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation (EMR). Major studies like the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai collectively point towards an increased health risk from cell phone-level EMR. These findings suggest the need for caution in dismissing potential risks.
Research Objectives and Methodology
The study aimed to examine cancer incidence and mortality trends, by birth cohort, for 34 types of cancer in the USA. Incidence data were obtained from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, and mortality data from the US National Center for Health Statistics. The data covered individuals aged 25-84 years for the period from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2019.
Key Findings
Cancer Types with Increased Incidence
Researchers found that the incidence rate ratios (IRRs) increased with each successive birth cohort born since approximately 1920 for eight types of cancer. Notably, the incidence rate was approximately two-to-three times higher in the 1990 birth cohort than in the 1955 birth cohort for small intestine, kidney and renal pelvis, and pancreatic cancers. Additionally, IRRs increased in younger cohorts for nine other cancers, including breast cancer, uterine cancer, colorectal cancer, and testicular cancer.
Factors Contributing to Increased Cancer Risk
Potential causes and risk factors for the increased cancer incidence include obesity, lifestyle, and environmental exposures. Ten of the 17 cancers with increasing incidence in younger cohorts are related to obesity. Researchers suspect that younger generations, under the age of 50, are increasingly exposed to carcinogens in early life or young adulthood.
The Misconception of Non-Thermal Radiation
Outdated Beliefs
For too long, it has been assumed that non-thermal radiation exposure, such as EMF radiation from wireless devices, is harmless. This belief is rooted in outdated guidelines that focus solely on thermal effects, ignoring the subtle yet profound impacts of non-thermal radiation on biological systems.
The Reality of Non-Thermal Effects
Scientific evidence increasingly shows that non-thermal radiation can cause significant biological dissonances, even at levels below which heating occurs. These effects include hormonal imbalances, neural development issues, and a host of other health problems. The pervasive exposure to this entropic waste is a silent yet pervasive threat to all living things.
The Real Threat of Non-Thermal Radiation and Entropic Waste
The Importance of Recognizing Life as Sustained Energy
Life is not merely a body of mass; it is sustained energy. Bioelectrical networks, the living fields of energy within and around us, are the true essence of life. These networks orchestrate the complex processes that sustain living organisms, and disruptions to these fields can lead to severe health consequences.
Entropic Waste and Biological Dissonances
The fundamental forces of energy used in technology emit pollution in the form of entropic waste. This waste directly causes biological dissonances, disrupting the delicate balance of bioelectrical networks. These disruptions can lead to a range of health issues, from mental disorders to chronic physical ailments.
Mental Health Effects
Exposure to non-thermal radiation and entropic waste has been linked to various mental health issues, including anxiety, depression, and cognitive decline. These effects are particularly concerning for children, whose developing brains are more susceptible to environmental influences.
Physical Health Effects
The physical health impacts of non-thermal radiation exposure are equally alarming. Research has shown links to hormonal disruptions, reproductive issues, and increased cancer risk. The cumulative effect of these exposures poses a significant threat to public health.
The Need for Updated Guidelines and Research
Updating FCC Guidelines
The current FCC guidelines are based on outdated science that fails to account for non-thermal effects. We must update these guidelines to reflect the latest scientific understanding of bioelectrical networks and the impacts of EMF radiation.
Restarting NTP Research
The National Toxicology Program’s research on wireless health effects was halted, diverting essential funding to other areas. This research must be restarted and prioritized to understand and mitigate the health impacts of non-thermal radiation exposure.
Advancements in RF Radiation Research
Therapeutic Potential of RF-EMF Treatment
Recent reviews state, “Existent literature points toward a yet untapped therapeutic potential of RF-EMF treatment which might aid in damaging cancer cells through bioelectrical and electromechanical molecular mechanisms while minimizing adverse effects on healthy tissue cells.”
Examples of Non-Thermal Interactions
Advancements in RF radiation research show biological interactions beyond thermal effects. For example, the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment employs RF radiation at power levels up to 1000 times lower than those emitted by cell phones, effectively treating inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions at the cellular or molecular level. This includes resonance effects, disruption of cellular signaling, and potential modulation of the immune system. This challenges the traditional view that non-ionizing cell phone radiation is biologically inert except for its heating properties.
A Call to Recognize and Act
Recognize Life as Energy
We must fundamentally shift our understanding of life to recognize it as sustained energy, not just mass. This perspective will help us better understand the true nature of biological systems and the impacts of environmental factors on health.
Addressing Entropic Waste
We must acknowledge that the entropic waste emitted by technological devices is a significant pollutant that disrupts bioelectrical networks. By addressing this pollution, we can mitigate its harmful effects and protect the health of current and future generations.
Mobilizing Public Awareness
Public awareness is crucial. We must educate people about the real threats posed by non-thermal radiation and entropic waste. This includes advocating for updated regulatory guidelines and supporting research into the health effects of EMF radiation.
Conclusion
The outdated belief that non-thermal radiation exposure is harmless and the failure to recognize life as sustained energy are causing a cascade of health effects that threaten the quality of life for all. By addressing these misconceptions and recognizing the true nature of bioelectrical networks, we can take meaningful steps to protect public health. It is time to act and ensure a healthier, safer future for all.
References
- Sung H, Jiang C, Bandi P, et al. Differences in cancer rates among adults born between 1920 and 1990 in the USA: an analysis of population-based cancer registry data. Lancet Public Health. 2024;9
