Why MAGA and MAHA Movements Are Failing Our Children
When we think about the movements claiming to “Make America Great Again” (MAGA) or “Make America Healthy Again” (MAHA), we often envision grand promises of renewed American values, safeguarded freedoms, and a more prosperous future for our families. Yet, for all the bluster and slogans, there is an unsettling silence from these quarters regarding a critical threat to children’s health and constitutional rights: Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA).
This decades-old provision effectively stops communities from considering health concerns when opposing the construction of cell towers and other wireless infrastructure. It relies on outdated Federal Communications Commission (FCC) safety standards, which focus almost exclusively on thermal (heating) effects of radiofrequency (RF) radiation, ignoring the growing body of evidence for non-thermal biological harm. The result? Parents, teachers, and local governments find themselves muzzled—and the so-called champions of “freedom” and “family values” (MAGA and MAHA) are nowhere to be found, failing our children in the process.
In this blog post, we will examine:
- How Section 704 became a “forgotten crisis” undermining American families.
- Why the outdated FCC guidelines are unconstitutional and out of step with modern science.
- The growing research on non-thermal biological effects—including studies from Iraq—revealing a stark contrast with stalled U.S. federal efforts.
- The hypocrisy of MAGA and MAHA movements in neglecting a core issue that directly affects families, constitutional rights, and America’s future.
- Actions we must take—from repealing Section 704 to investing in updated, science-based safety guidelines.
The stakes could not be higher. Wireless infrastructure is expanding at breakneck speed, exposing children, pregnant women, and vulnerable populations to continuous radiofrequency radiation (RFR). This blog will delve into why we must act now, and why the silence of those who claim to protect our freedoms is no longer acceptable.
Section 704: The Forgotten Crisis Undermining American Families
What Is Section 704?
Section 704 is a relatively short but powerful clause embedded in the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Drafted during the Clinton administration, it forbids local governments from denying the placement of cell towers and other wireless infrastructure on the basis of health or environmental concerns. Specifically:
- It prohibits municipalities from considering health concerns when challenging wireless deployments.
- It prevents courts from hearing health-related evidence in legal disputes regarding cell tower placement.
- It ties communities to outdated FCC safety standards—focused on heat-based (thermal) metrics and ignoring newer data on non-thermal effects.
Essentially, Section 704 strips citizens of their right to voice legitimate concerns about the safety of ubiquitous wireless infrastructure. Despite robust rhetoric around “freedom,” one of the most fundamental freedoms—local control over community health—has been systematically denied.
The Clinton-Epstein Era: Seeds of Systemic Corruption
Section 704 emerged in an era of big corporate influence—often referred to now, in a historical context, as the Clinton-Epstein era—when vested interests heavily shaped policy decisions. Telecom industries, eyeing exponential profit from wireless expansion, lobbied aggressively to ensure minimal regulatory barriers. By embedding Section 704 into the TCA, policymakers effectively:
- Sidelined scientific warnings about radiofrequency radiation.
- Subverted constitutional protections, such as the 10th Amendment, which grants states and localities certain autonomous rights.
- Created a legislative environment that favors the profitability of telecom giants over the health and constitutional rights of citizens.
For nearly three decades, this provision has gone largely uncontested by mainstream political movements. MAGA and MAHA proponents, who claim to champion local governance and personal freedoms, have barely made a peep about this blatant overreach.
A Constitutional Betrayal
Section 704 also raises constitutional alarm bells. It tramples on:
- The 10th Amendment by restricting local governments from passing laws or making decisions based on potential health hazards within their own jurisdictions.
- The First Amendment by effectively chilling free speech on health issues, as plaintiffs cannot introduce health-related arguments in court when challenging new cell towers.
In an era where “unconstitutional” is frequently invoked in political debates, the silence on Section 704 by self-styled defenders of liberty is baffling—and indefensible.
Outdated FCC Guidelines: A Time Capsule From 1996
The Thermal-Only Myth
The FCC’s current safety guidelines trace back to 1996, an age when flip phones were cutting-edge technology and 5G was the stuff of futuristic dreams. These guidelines hinge on one crucial assumption: that only heating (thermal) effects of RF radiation can be harmful. In other words, if the radiation doesn’t raise your tissue temperature, it’s presumed safe. Yet the world has changed radically since 1996:
- Massive increases in wireless density (cell phones, Wi-Fi routers, tablets, smartwatches, smart homes, and the upcoming Internet of Things).
- Broader frequency spectra, including 5G, which utilizes a range of frequencies never before tested extensively in the long term.
- A dramatic rise in cumulative exposure, especially among children who now grow up in a sea of wireless signals.
Landmark Studies Ignored
Since the late 1990s, numerous studies have shown non-thermal biological effects from RF radiation:
- The National Toxicology Program (NTP) found “clear evidence” of carcinogenic effects in rats, including heart schwannomas and brain gliomas, at exposure levels near those of common cell phone use.
- The Ramazzini Institute in Italy corroborated these findings with large-scale animal studies at lower exposure levels.
- The BioInitiative Report, compiling thousands of peer-reviewed articles, argues for significantly stricter limits due to neurological, reproductive, and carcinogenic risks.
Yet, despite repeated petitions and warnings, the FCC and other agencies remain mired in outdated standards. Even a 2021 U.S. Court of Appeals ruling, which criticized the FCC for failing to consider modern scientific evidence, has done little to move the needle toward safer guidelines.
Children Are Not Just “Mini-Adults”
A primary failing of the 1996 thermal framework is that it treats all bodies equally. Children, with thinner skulls, developing brains, and rapidly dividing cells, are at greater risk from prolonged RF exposure. The argument that the guidelines are “one-size-fits-all” defies basic principles of pediatric health. It also disregards warnings from pediatric neurologists and other experts who have observed correlations between RF exposure and developmental or behavioral issues.
The Deafening Silence: Why MAGA and MAHA Movements Are Failing Our Children
“Freedom” Rhetoric vs. Real Freedoms
MAGA (Make America Great Again) and MAHA (Make America Healthy Again) movements frequently discuss:
- Freedom from government overreach
- Constitutional values
- Family and community
However, when it comes to Section 704—an actual piece of legislation that strips parents and local governments of their right to challenge the placement of wireless infrastructure—they are eerily quiet. If they genuinely champion these causes, why not rally against a law that overtly erodes local autonomy and individual choice?
A Focus on Superficial Culture Wars
Instead of addressing the underlying health concerns tied to RF radiation, these movements often veer into culture war issues that, while important to some, fail to tackle core health and constitutional crises. By ignoring Section 704, they:
- Let telecom giants off the hook in dictating local zoning and community health decisions.
- Fail to address a significant constitutional problem that directly impacts families.
- Forfeit credibility when claiming to stand for “American greatness” or “American health.”
Political capital is often spent on fleeting controversies rather than on substantial policy reforms that can dramatically improve public well-being.
The Real Hypocrisy
MAGA and MAHA supporters cannot credibly trumpet “defense of the Constitution” while ignoring Section 704’s blatant assault on the 10th Amendment. Nor can they tout “family values” while overlooking the mounting evidence that children face heightened risks of neurological and reproductive harm from chronic RF exposure.
The Real Danger of EMFs and RFR: A Growing Body of Evidence
Non-Thermal Effects: The Evidence
While government agencies and industry representatives often point to “thermal-only” arguments, a voluminous body of research disputes that position. Non-thermal biological effects include:
- Oxidative stress: A cascade of free radicals causing cellular damage and inflammation.
- DNA breaks and genetic mutations: Studies since 1997 show around 70–80% of researched scenarios indicate significant genetic effects even at exposures below thermal thresholds.
- Neurological disruptions: Anxiety, disrupted sleep patterns, and ADHD-like symptoms linked to prenatal exposure in animal models.
- Reproductive harm: Issues with sperm quality, hormonal balance, and fertility—implicating everything from potential birth defects to long-term population health challenges.
Landmark Studies Worth Revisiting
- National Toxicology Program (NTP)
- Found clear evidence of cancer (schwannomas and gliomas) in rodents.
- Identified biological changes—like DNA strand breaks—that challenge the thermal-only paradigm.
- Ramazzini Institute
- Examined lower exposure levels that mirror real-world chronic exposure.
- Reinforced findings that RFR can be carcinogenic, especially with long-term exposure.
- REFLEX Project (EU)
- Demonstrated DNA damage in human cells from RF fields, which cannot be fully explained by thermal mechanisms.
- BioInitiative Report
- Over 1,800 references to potential harmful effects from low-level electromagnetic fields (EMFs).
- Stresses that children and pregnant women warrant special protection.
A Global Perspective on Research
Microwave News has pointed out a perplexing reality: there is more active research on these topics in countries like Iraq than in the United States, which was once a leader in scientific exploration. The U.S. National Toxicology Program had been on track to dive deeper into wireless radiation’s health effects, but funding and momentum have stalled post-release of the initial alarming findings. Countries such as Iraq are now stepping up, publishing robust animal studies on multiple LTE frequencies, while the U.S. lags—an astonishing turnaround for a country that once prided itself on scientific leadership.
Why Is the U.S. No Longer Leading the Way?
Funding and Industry Influence
One of the biggest obstacles to robust RF health research in the U.S. is funding. Federal agencies reduced or halted funding for large-scale, long-term studies after the NTP results challenged the safety narrative. Industry influence often plays a role, as powerful telecoms lobby against new regulations, citing high compliance costs and potential profit loss.
The Culture of Dismissal
Another factor is the academic and regulatory tendency to dismiss non-thermal effects as “fringe” or “unproven.” Critics argue that focusing exclusively on thermal mechanisms is like assessing the danger of cigarettes solely by the potential to cause burns, ignoring chemical carcinogens in smoke.
Skepticism vs. Willful Blindness
Healthy skepticism is vital for scientific integrity, but there is a fine line between skeptical inquiry and outright denial of accumulating evidence. Dismissing non-thermal research in favor of a 30-year-old standard is akin to ignoring the entire body of modern science on the subject.
The Iraq Research: A Surprising Development
LTE (Long-Term Evolution) Rat Studies
A recent paper in the Open Veterinary Journal (2024) by Omar B. Aghaa and Bashaer K. Hameed examines the biological effects of LTE frequencies (850 MHz, 1800 MHz, and 2600 MHz) on rats. The researchers observed:
- Hematological changes: Indicating potential stress or inflammation responses.
- Thermographic alterations: Suggestive of changes in blood flow or tissue function, not explained by simple heating alone.
This kind of multi-frequency, long-duration exposure study is exactly the type of research the U.S. should be pursuing. Instead, it is happening in Iraq, a striking commentary on the global shift in wireless radiation research.
Why This Matters
That nations like Iraq are now leading in these nuanced studies raises many questions:
- Why has the U.S. lost its appetite for critical examination of RF technology safety?
- Shouldn’t Americans be demanding thorough, unbiased research, especially if telecommunications infrastructure saturates our daily lives?
- Where are the Constitutional protectors in ensuring that local communities have a say in the wireless infrastructure overshadowing schools and neighborhoods?
A Halt in Cancer Research: The Derailment of the U.S. National Toxicology Program
Clear Evidence, Then Silence
The U.S. National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) studies released around 2018–2019 showed that high exposure to 2G and 3G RFR led to clear evidence of carcinogenicity in animals. This should have triggered extensive follow-up research:
- Mechanistic studies to understand how exactly RFR triggers tumor development.
- Epidemiological studies to correlate these findings with human data, particularly long-term cell phone users.
- Expansions to 4G and 5G frequencies to see if the risk profiles change at newer frequency bands.
Instead, federal momentum petered out. Under the Biden-Harris administration, large-scale cancer research specific to RFR has not resumed in a meaningful way. This lull is unconscionable, given the significance of the NTP’s findings.
The Missed Opportunity for Medical Advancements
Ironically, deeper investigation into RFR’s biological mechanisms could pave the way for:
- Novel cancer treatments that use specific RF frequencies to selectively target tumor cells.
- Guidelines for safe application of RF in medical therapies, such as the FDA-approved TheraBionic device for inoperable liver cancer (which operates at power levels significantly lower than a typical cell phone).
By clinging to the outdated premise that non-thermal RFR has no biological effect, we risk stifling both the protective measures we desperately need and the potential medical breakthroughs that harness targeted RF for therapeutic purposes.
TheraBionic and Non-Thermal Interactions: A Game-Changer?
What Is TheraBionic?
TheraBionic is an FDA-approved device that uses extremely low-power RF radiation to treat inoperable liver cancer. Its mechanism involves non-thermal interactions at the cellular or molecular level, such as:
- Resonance effects that target cancer cells.
- Disruption of cellular signaling within malignant growths.
- Potential modulation of the immune system, enhancing the body’s natural defenses.
Up to 1,000 Times Lower Than Cell Phone Output
One of the most significant aspects of TheraBionic’s design is that it emits power levels that can be up to 1,000 times lower than those from a standard cell phone. Yet, it still manages to exert a medically significant effect on cancer cells. This single example demolishes the blanket assertion that “if it doesn’t cook tissue, it can’t be doing anything.” Clearly, there’s much more at play than simple heating.
Implications for Outdated Safety Guidelines
The existence and efficacy of TheraBionic underscore why it’s time to overhaul the FCC’s archaic frameworks. If ultra-low-power RF waves can beneficially affect cancer cells, then standard RF emissions from wireless infrastructure—at thousands of times higher power—could also have unintended and possibly harmful biological impacts.
The Path Forward: What Needs to Change
Repeal Section 704 of the TCA
For constitutional, public health, and moral reasons, Section 704 must be repealed. This outdated law:
- Denies local communities a voice in protecting themselves.
- Mandates adherence to outdated, thermal-only safety standards at the expense of modern science.
- Sets a dangerous precedent that corporate interests override constitutional protections.
The MAGA and MAHA movements, if genuinely committed to protecting American families and preserving constitutional freedoms, should lead the charge in dismantling Section 704.
Update FCC Guidelines to Reflect Modern Science
New guidelines should:
- Incorporate non-thermal biological effects identified in recent research.
- Adopt more protective exposure limits, particularly for children, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised.
- Require precautionary measures in schools, hospitals, and residential areas.
- Encourage research and transparency, ensuring that new frequency bands (e.g., 5G, 6G) undergo rigorous, independent safety testing before widespread deployment.
Restore and Expand Federal Research Funding
The U.S. cannot afford to lag behind other nations in understanding the biological impacts of pervasive RF exposure. Congress and the Administration should:
- Fully fund an expanded National Toxicology Program to explore 4G, 5G, and emerging technologies.
- Support independent labs that conduct mechanistic studies, epidemiological surveys, and replication efforts to build consensus.
- Encourage private-public partnerships that maintain scientific independence, ensuring that industry influence does not undermine research integrity.
Demand Accountability and Transparency
Holding agencies and telecom companies accountable is crucial. If a study finds a potential link between RFR and health issues, that data should not be suppressed, dismissed, or buried in legal jargon. Parents, policymakers, and the general public deserve transparent risk assessments, labeling, and guidelines that reflect the best available science.
Where Is the Outrage?
The Deafening Silence of So-Called Guardians of Freedom
It’s perplexing that the very groups who claim to stand for “freedom” and “constitutional rights” are not clamoring to repeal Section 704. If an unconstitutional law strips communities of their power to protect their children, where are the rousing speeches, the social media hashtags, and the legislative crusades? This silence is a clear sign of hypocrisy.
A Call to MAGA and MAHA Supporters
If you identify with the MAGA or MAHA movements, this is your wake-up call. You cannot cherry-pick which constitutional principles to uphold. Upholding the Constitution means defending local autonomy, safeguarding free speech on health matters, and ensuring that scientific advancements inform public policy. Anything less is a betrayal of the very freedoms you purport to champion.
Taking Personal Action: Protect Your Family and Your Community
Practical Measures at Home
While we wait for legislative and regulatory reforms, parents can take immediate steps:
- Use wired connections where possible (Ethernet cables instead of Wi-Fi).
- Minimize device usage among children, especially during sleep.
- Invest in protective cases or fabrics designed to reduce RF exposure.
- Maintain distance: Keep devices like routers away from bedrooms and living spaces.
Grassroots Efforts
- Community Organizing: Mobilize neighbors, PTA members, and local activists to push for safer infrastructure placement.
- Contact Your Representatives: Demand they support initiatives to repeal Section 704 and adopt modern FCC standards.
- Public Awareness Campaigns: Use social media to highlight the risks of outdated safety guidelines and the urgent need for scientific research.
Supporting Independent Research
Donating to or volunteering with research organizations that study the biological impacts of RFR helps ensure that the momentum continues, even if federal funding lags. Look for institutions free from telecom industry conflicts of interest.
Conclusion: A Fight for America’s Future
Section 704 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 represents more than a bureaucratic oversight; it is a direct assault on constitutional rights, public health, and the well-being of our children. Its continued enforcement reveals a glaring hypocrisy among those who claim to stand for freedom, family values, and constitutional integrity yet turn a blind eye to this flagrant overreach.
The science on non-thermal biological effects of RF radiation is neither negligible nor fringe. From the National Toxicology Program’s “clear evidence” of carcinogenic risk to the emerging research on device-based cancer therapies like TheraBionic, the evidence is unequivocal: non-thermal interactions matter. Ignoring them, in the name of outdated safety guidelines from 1996, jeopardizes not only public health but also critical scientific breakthroughs that could save lives.
As microwaves, cell signals, and Wi-Fi become ever more enmeshed in modern life, the need for transparent, robust safety standards has never been more urgent. We must repeal Section 704 to restore local governance, update FCC guidelines to reflect modern scientific realities, and resume large-scale federal research to understand fully the implications of pervasive RF radiation.
For MAGA and MAHA supporters, this is a litmus test of sincerity. You cannot claim to protect American families and constitutional freedoms while remaining silent on laws that strip communities of their right to safeguard children’s health. The choice is clear: either stand against Section 704 and outdated FCC guidelines or continue to betray the very ideals you profess.
Our children’s future depends on it.
If America is to remain a beacon of innovation, freedom, and health, it must confront—and fix—this “forgotten crisis.” From local communities to the halls of Congress, everyone has a role to play in demanding transparency, accountability, and the rule of science over outdated policy. The time to act is now, before another generation grows up in a wireless landscape that we barely understand, yet are powerless to question or control.
