The mainstream narrative claims there is “no credible evidence” linking radiofrequency (RF) radiation to harm. But what if the very agencies making these claims were actively violating federal law by failing to conduct the research they are legally required to do?
This isn’t speculation—it’s fact. The FDA is under a mandatory congressional mandate to study radiation risks, but it is not fulfilling its legal obligation. The shutdown of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) research on RF radiation after it found clear evidence of cancer is proof that the system is rigged against public health. And yet, when RFK Jr. exposes this, corporate media labels it “misinformation.”
Public Law 90-602: The FDA’s Legal Obligation to Study Radiation
The Radiation Control for Health and Safety Act of 1968 (Public Law 90-602) requires the FDA to research and regulate radiation exposure from electronic products, including RF radiation from wireless devices. The law was designed to ensure that public health decisions are based on scientific evidence, not industry influence.
Yet today, the FDA is ignoring this obligation. Instead of funding new research, the agency dismisses mounting evidence of harm with outdated, industry-backed claims. If the FDA were truly following the law, it would have continued the NTP’s work and expanded research into RF radiation’s biological effects.
The FCC Lost in Court—Because Its Safety Standards Are Baseless
Another critical piece of evidence that exposes the lie behind “no credible risk” claims is the legal victory RFK Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT) won against the FCC in 2021.
In Environmental Health Trust et al. v. Federal Communications Commission, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled that the FCC failed to provide a scientific basis for keeping its outdated thermal-only RF exposure guidelines.
- The FCC’s safety limits were created by engineers, not doctors or biologists.
- The court decision forced the FCC to acknowledge that it had ignored thousands of studies showing non-thermal biological effects.
- The ruling exposed the lack of justification for the industry-backed limits, which were based on 1996 standards that only consider tissue heating, not biological disruption.
If the government’s own court system determined that the FCC’s guidelines were scientifically unjustified, why does the FDA continue to rely on them? The answer is clear: regulatory capture—industry influence over public health policy.
Thousands of Studies Confirm Non-Thermal Risks
The false claim that “there is no evidence of harm” is not just wrong—it’s a direct contradiction of decades of scientific research:
- The CTIA (Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association) funded a $25 million study that raised questions about non-thermal risks.
- Arthur Guy’s U.S. Air Force research on RF exposure showed biological effects that could not be explained by heating.
- Dr. Robert O. Becker, a two-time Nobel Prize nominee, provided overwhelming evidence that non-thermal electromagnetic fields affect biological systems.
- The BioInitiative Report reviewed over 1,800 studies showing biological effects of RF radiation.
- The National Toxicology Program’s (NTP) study—funded by the U.S. government—found “clear evidence” of cancer from RF exposure before funding was abruptly cut.
There are thousands of studies—not a handful, not fringe science, but an overwhelming body of peer-reviewed research that contradicts the industry’s safety claims.
Why the FDA and FCC Are Violating Public Trust
The FDA and FCC are both failing to protect public health by refusing to acknowledge this research. The FCC has not updated its RF exposure limits since 1996, despite major technological changes. The FDA is violating Public Law 90-602 by refusing to continue research into radiation effects.
This is not just negligence—it’s a violation of federal law.
The Bottom Line: RFK Jr. Was Right
The real misinformation is coming from regulatory agencies and the mainstream media, not RFK Jr. His legal victory against the FCC proves that the government’s own safety standards lack scientific justification. The FDA’s refusal to fund RF research is a violation of its legal mandate. The National Toxicology Program found clear evidence of cancer, and the government shut it down instead of expanding research.
RFK Jr. is not spreading misinformation—he’s exposing a public health scandal. The real question is, why aren’t more people talking about this?
