Recent advancements in biotechnology, such as the development of mRNA vaccines, have revolutionized the medical field. Yet, these breakthroughs have also unveiled unexpected phenomena that challenge our understanding of biological processes. Among these is the emergence of self-assembled structures in mRNA vaccines, often referred to as “Pfizerbots.” This blog explores the mystery behind Pfizerbots and delves into the fundamental role of the fundamental forces of nature in their formation and behavior.
A paper titled “Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna“
What Are Pfizerbots?
According to Young Mi Lee, MD, and Daniel Broudy, PhD, Pfizerbots are self-assembled structures discovered in mRNA vaccines produced by manufacturers like Pfizer and Moderna. These artificial entities include spirals, chains, and worm-like forms, capable of assembling and replicating under laboratory conditions designed to mimic the human body. While some have speculated that these structures represent advanced nanotechnology, a more plausible explanation lies in how these components respond to electric and magnetic field alterations induced by entropic changes – natural and artificial.
The Role of Bioelectricity in Self-Assembly
Bioelectricity is the electrical potential generated by cells and tissues, critical for guiding cellular communication, growth, and self-replication. Each cell in the human body produces electrical signals through ion channels, creating bioelectric fields that regulate essential biological processes such as tissue regeneration, wound healing, and embryonic development.
The self-assembly behavior of Pfizerbots can be understood through this lens of bioelectricity. When genetic material from mRNA vaccines is introduced into the body, it may interact with the body’s existing bioelectric fields. This interaction initiates a chain reaction, where components align and connect based on bioelectric cues, similar to how dominoes fall in a precise pattern. Under the right energetic and environmental conditions, these structures may form and even replicate, guided by the bioelectric landscape within the body.
Xenobots vs. Pfizerbots
To better grasp the nature of Pfizerbots, we can draw a comparison to Xenobots. Xenobots are tiny, biologically engineered organisms created by assembling stem cells from the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis). These engineered organisms are capable of self-replication, driven by bioelectric signals that govern cellular behavior.
Similarly, the self-assembled structures reported in Pfizer’s mRNA vaccines appear to respond to unknown environmental signals within the simulation of the human body. This parallel suggests that, like Xenobots, Pfizerbots rely on entropic forces for self-organization and replication. This insight reveals a deeper truth: life’s plasticity and capacity for self-replication are not confined to traditional biological organisms but extend into synthetic systems guided by bioelectric principles as well.
Bioelectricity and the Misclassification of RF Radiation Risks
The discovery of self-assembled structures like Pfizerbots highlights a critical gap in our understanding of bioelectricity. One of the most concerning implications of this discovery is how external forces, such as radiofrequency (RF) radiation, may disrupt bioelectric fields. RF radiation, which is emitted by wireless technologies such as Wi-Fi and cell towers, has long been classified as a minor health risk. However, emerging evidence suggests that RF radiation can interfere with the body’s natural bioelectric processes, potentially leading to cancers, cognitive disorders, and other health issues.
The presence of self-assembling structures in mRNA vaccines raises questions about the potential impact of these external RF fields on bioelectric signals. If RF radiation can disrupt the natural bioelectric cues in the human body, it is possible that the interaction of these forces with structures like Pfizerbots could have unintended consequences, further complicating our ability to understand and regulate damage caused by these self-assembled entities—natural and unnatural viruses.
The Importance of Reclassifying RF Health Risks
The current classification of RF radiation as a negligible health risk has stymied essential research into how it affects bioelectric processes. To fully understand bioelectricity, we must understand how entropic forces affect it. The impact of RF radiation and RF risks must be reclassified. This reclassification will unlock necessary funding for research into bioelectricity, which could ultimately reveal how RF exposure, “entropic waste,” may be contributing to a range of health issues, from cancers to neurological disorders.
A Call for Immediate Research and Policy Changes
The discoveries surrounding Pfizerbots and the groundbreaking work on Xenobots demand a fundamental shift in how we view bioelectricity’s role in biological processes. By reclassifying RF health risks and investing in bioelectric research, we can explore how bioelectric fields guide life’s plasticity and self-assembly. This research could lead to breakthrough solutions for chronic diseases, improve our understanding of developmental biology, and offer new perspectives on regenerative medicine.
The Broader Implications of Bioelectricity
Bioelectricity is not just an underlying mechanism for self-replication; it is a universal principle governing life itself. From the formation of embryos to the regeneration of tissues, bioelectric fields are responsible for directing the fundamental processes that sustain life. The discovery of self-assembled structures in mRNA vaccines offers a unique window into how bioelectric forces can guide the organization of both natural and synthetic structures. However, without proper research, we are blind to the potential risks and benefits of these interactions.
Xenobot and Pfizerbot: The Need for Bioelectric Exploration
The comparison between Xenobots and Pfizerbots highlights the need for an in-depth exploration of bioelectricity’s role in self-replicating systems. Michael Levin’s work on Xenobots has shown that bioelectric fields can guide cells to behave in ways that go beyond their genetic programming. Similarly, Pfizerbots appear to be influenced by entropic forces in a closed environment like the human body, raising important questions about the interplay between bioelectricity and synthetic biology. Understanding this relationship is crucial for developing safe and effective biotechnologies in the future.
Reclaiming Bioelectricity’s Potential
For decades, bioelectricity has been an overlooked field of study, with most scientific focus centered on genetics and biochemistry. However, the discoveries of Xenobots and Pfizerbots reveal the immense power of bioelectricity in guiding life’s processes. By recognizing the importance of bioelectricity and reclassifying RF risks, we can begin to unlock the full potential of this field. This shift in focus could lead to revolutionary advancements in medicine, from curing chronic diseases to regenerating damaged tissues.
Lifting the Veil of Ignorance
The mystery of Pfizerbots offers a glimpse into a world where entropic forces such as bioelectricity play a critical yet poorly understood role in the self-replication and organization of biological and synthetic systems. The failure to understand bioelectricity and its role in health and disease represents a significant gap in modern science. Until we lift the veil of ignorance surrounding bioelectricity and its disruption by RF radiation, we will remain unable to comprehend the impact of entropic waste on human health.
To safeguard the future, it is crucial that we reclassify RF radiation risks, invest in bioelectric research, and continue exploring the ways in which bioelectricity shapes both natural and engineered life. By doing so, we will pave the way for new discoveries that could revolutionize medicine and bioengineering, bringing us closer to a healthier and more sustainable future.
