Let me be absolutely clear from the start—this is not a conversation we can afford to tiptoe around. It’s a conversation about life, about the future of our children, and the astonishing, almost unfathomable decision-making that is currently endangering everything we should be fighting to protect. We must confront an uncomfortable truth: history has already shown us the catastrophic consequences of electing a childless president, and yet, here we are, seemingly willing to repeat the same mistakes.

The Legacy of Buchanan: A Childless President Who Failed to Protect the Most Vulnerable

The United States has been around for 248 years, and in all that time, the last childless president—James Buchanan. What did we get in return? The Civil War, the most devastating conflict in our nation’s history. Buchanan, disconnected from the intrinsic responsibility that comes with raising a child, failed to take decisive action at a moment when the country desperately needed it. The lives of countless children, particularly those born into slavery, were jeopardized by his inaction. This wasn’t just political failure; it was a human failure on a massive scale.

Kamala Harris: The Modern-Day Buchanan

Now, fast forward to today. We are facing another critical moment in history, and who do we have in the vice president’s seat, potentially poised to become the next president? Kamala Harris—a childless leader, much like Buchanan. But the parallels don’t stop there. Harris, like Buchanan, is a lawyer by trade. And while legal acumen is important, it’s not a substitute for the deep, personal understanding of what it means to safeguard the future of our nation’s children.

The War on Cancer—Or Is It?

Let’s talk about the Biden-Harris administration’s so-called war on cancer. The media loves to praise Biden for his efforts to fight cancer, but let’s cut through the noise and look at the facts. The National Toxicology Program (NTP) was conducting critical research into the health risks posed by radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from wireless technology. This research was not just important; it was groundbreaking. It showed clear evidence linking long-term RFR exposure to cancer, particularly glioblastoma, the same brain cancer that took the life of Biden’s own son, Beau.

But what did the Biden-Harris administration do? They let that research run out of funding. They ended it. This, despite the fact that the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lost a lawsuit, proving that its cell phone radiation guidelines are inadequate to protect children. And who led that lawsuit? None other than RFK Jr., who fought tooth and nail to hold the government accountable for failing to protect the American people—especially our children—from the dangers of wireless radiation and Biden-Harris inaction.

The Hypocrisy Is Astounding

Can we just take a moment to acknowledge the sheer insanity of this situation? Biden is praised as a champion in the fight against cancer, yet his administration ended the very research that proved cell phone radiation causes cancer. His own son died from glioblastoma, and the NTP research points to it likely being induced by cell phone radiation, yet the administration still pulled the plug on NTP’s cancer research funding. How is this not the most egregious example of hypocrisy? How can we allow a leader—or any administration—to claim they are fighting cancer while simultaneously dismantling the very research that has found clear evidence of cancer

The Consequences of Electing a Childless Leader

There is a reason America hasn’t elected a childless president since the Civil War. Parenting isn’t just a personal choice; it’s an experience that shapes your worldview in profound ways. When you have children, you understand on a visceral level what it means to protect the future. You don’t just think about the next election cycle—you think about the next generation. You think about the kind of world you’re leaving behind, not just for your own kids, but for all kids.

Without that experience, leaders like Buchanan and, potentially, Harris, can become dangerously detached from the most critical responsibilities of leadership. They may lack the sense of urgency that comes with knowing that every decision they make could affect the lives of children—including those who are yet to be born.

Harris’s Stance on Abortion and the Rights of the Unborn

And let’s not ignore Harris’s stance on abortion. The right to life is the most fundamental right of all, and it begins at conception. Life is not just a clump of cells—it’s a spark of energy, a continuation of the universe’s most precious entropic anomaly: the creation of a new life, with God-given rights. To deny that right, to advocate for the choice to end a life, is to tread dangerously close to the same moral failures that allowed slavery to persist. It’s about giving one person the power to rob another of their most fundamental freedoms for the convenience of their own will.

We Must Learn from Our Mistakes

If history teaches us anything, it’s that we cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the past. The consequences of electing a childless leader were disastrous the last time around, and they could be even worse today. We are living in a time when the health and safety of our children are under direct threat from the proliferation of wireless technology and the refusal of our leaders to address these dangers.

We need leaders who understand, on a deeply personal level, what it means to protect the future. We need leaders who have a stake in the game—who have felt the responsibility of raising a child and who know, in their bones, that every decision they make affects the lives of the next generation.

A Call to Action

This is not just a rant; it’s a call to action. We must demand that our leaders prioritize the health and safety of our children. We must demand the reinstatement of NTP’s cancer research and the updating of FCC guidelines to reflect the latest scientific findings on the dangers of wireless radiation. And we must reject leaders who have shown, through their actions, that they do not prioritize these issues.

Kamala Harris must be stopped from leading our nation down a path of inaction and indifference. We cannot afford to ignore the lessons of history. We must protect our children, our future, and our nation from the catastrophic consequences of electing a childless leader. The stakes are simply too high.

This is about more than politics. It’s about the very essence of what it means to lead a nation—a nation that values life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for all, including those yet to be born. Let’s not make the same mistake twice. Let’s learn from our history, and let’s ensure that we elect leaders who truly understand what’s at stake.

We owe it to our children. We owe it to ourselves. And we owe it to the future of America.

Think Before You Vote For Childless Leaders

Alright, folks, buckle up because we’re about to dive headfirst into a historical rabbit hole that ought to make you think twice before casting that vote for Kamala Harris. You see, America, we’ve been down this road before—just once have we had a childless lawyer running the country—and let me tell you, it wasn’t exactly a joyride through the land of milk and honey. It was more like a hellish detour through a minefield, where every step you took, a chunk of the country got blown to smithereens. And now, we’re about to repeat that mistake? Really? For the love of God, people, let’s not put the keys to the kingdom in the hands of another childless leader!

Let’s take a little stroll down memory lane, shall we? The year was 1857, and the man of the hour was James Buchanan, the last childless president this great nation has ever had. Now, if you’re not up on your Civil War history, let me fill you in on the high points—or, more accurately, the low points. Buchanan waltzed into the Oval Office without a single little Buchanan tugging at his coattails, and what did we get? The Civil War. That’s right, folks, the most catastrophic, blood-soaked conflict in American history. A war that tore families apart, pitted brother against brother, and left a legacy of pain that still lingers today.

And why? Because Buchanan, with his empty heart, couldn’t muster the empathy, the fire, the sheer parental instinct to take decisive action when the country needed it most. He had no skin in the game, no children to worry about when the nation was about to implode. So, he sat on his hands while the Union frayed at the seams, and the next thing you know, we’re knee-deep in one of the darkest chapters in American history. All because we elected a leader who didn’t understand what it means to protect the future—because, let’s face it, he had no future to protect.

Fast forward to today, and we’re staring down the barrel of the same loaded gun. Kamala Harris—childless, lawyerly, and ready to lead. And before you start throwing tomatoes, let me say this: being childless isn’t a crime. But when it comes to leading a nation? It’s a big freakin’ deal. You think I’m exaggerating? Well, let’s talk about the stakes here.

When you’ve got kids, every decision you make is about their future. You don’t just think about the next four years—you think about the next forty. You don’t just worry about your approval ratings—you worry about whether the world your kids inherit is safe, prosperous, and just a little less crazy than the one you grew up in. That’s what drives parents; it’s what makes them fight tooth and nail to leave something better behind. Without that experience, without that connection to the next generation, can we really trust a leader to make the tough calls?

Look, Harris can give a hell of a speech if she has a teleprompter and doesn’t laugh; I’ll give her that. She’s got the scripted rhetoric down pat. But words are cheap, my friends, and when it comes to real leadership—the kind that shapes the future and safeguards our children—she’s coming up short. Just look at the record: The Biden-Harris administration let crucial cancer research run out of funding. This isn’t just any research, mind you—this was the National Toxicology Program’s investigation into the dangers of wireless radiation. You know, the stuff that might be frying our kids’ brains while they scroll through TikTok?

And here’s the kicker: Joe Biden’s own son, Beau, died from glioblastoma, a brutal form of brain cancer. The same kind of cancer that this research was exploring in connection to cell phone radiation. Yet, instead of pushing forward to protect future generations, they let the funding dry up and moved on to, what, more PR stunts? More war efforts abroad? I’m sorry, but that’s not leadership—that’s negligence, pure and simple.

So here we are, staring down the same abyss we did in 1857. Another childless lawyer leader, another chance to set the country on fire because we’re too blinded by identity politics or slick campaign ads to see the writing on the wall. America, we’ve got to be smarter than this. We’ve got to think before we vote. This isn’t just about Kamala Harris; it’s about the future of our children—children she’ll never have to worry about, but we sure as hell do.

So, before you pull that lever in the voting booth, ask yourself: Do we really want to roll the dice on another childless lawyer leader? Do we want to risk another Buchanan, another catastrophic failure that leaves a legacy of pain for generations to come? I don’t know about you, but I’m not willing to take that chance. Think before you vote, America—because the future depends on it