Could our modern electromagnetic environment be making us sicker than we realize—especially those dealing with Lyme disease, mold illness, or other chronic infections? Despite thousands of peer-reviewed studies detailing potential risks from non-thermal EMF exposure, many established scientists and clinicians still dismiss or overlook the mounting evidence. This blog post aims to correct that oversight
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield Anti-Radiation Case — The essential requirement of any cell phone radiation shielding is that it is electrically conductive. RF Safe® microwave radiation shielding material is integrated into the front flap of the outer case to deflect radiation (5G, Wi-Fi, EMF, etc.) away from your body while still allowing the
RF Safe® QuantaCase™ Phone Radiation Shield The cellular transmission SAR values for the Apple iPhone Se 3 (2022) (FCC ID BCG-E4082A) are 1.20 W/kg (watts per kilogram) at the head and 1.19 W/kg when worn on the body. The hotspot/Airplay SAR level is 1.19 W/kg. The simultaneous transmission SAR values for iPhone SE 3 (2022) (cellular plus Wi-Fi) is 1.40 W/kg at
In recent years, the conversation around neurological disorders—especially autism spectrum disorder (ASD)—has taken center stage. High-profile voices, including political figures and health advocates, have debated whether vaccines are to blame for the surge in autism diagnoses. This focus on vaccines often stems from understandable parental concerns and the fear that some environmental factor could be
When it comes to stopping a cell tower project, most communities assume that health and environmental concerns should be front and center. However, the Telecommunications Act of 1996 (TCA) severely limits the ability of local governments and citizens to block towers based on health-related arguments. This has created an environment where standard pleas about property
In November 2024, an unprecedented decision reverberated across Navajo County, Arizona: the Navajo County Board of Supervisors (BOS) denied an application to build a 120-foot cell tower east of Snowflake. At first glance, this may seem like a small, local land-use decision. But beneath that surface lie deeper questions about health, disability rights, the environment,
Our society stands at a crossroads. On one hand, visionaries like Elon Musk push us toward multi-planetary existence, advanced AI integration, and higher birth rates to sustain civilization. On the other, a silent hazard—radiofrequency (RF) radiation from ubiquitous wireless devices—continues to provoke growing scientific concern. This clash isn’t just academic; it’s painfully personal for many
The rapid expansion of wireless communication technologies, particularly the deployment of 5G networks, has heightened public concerns about the potential health impacts of radio frequency radiation (RFR). RFR, emitted by mobile phones and their infrastructure, is an omnipresent feature of modern life. Current regulatory standards, set by bodies like the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and
Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, recently stirred controversy with remarks dismissing concerns about cell phone radiation. In a video shared on social media, Musk claimed that he wouldn’t be worried even if he wore underwear and a helmet made entirely of cell phones. His lighthearted comments suggested that the only effect might
President-elect Donald Trump’s recent nominations of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Brendan Carr as Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) have sparked discussions due to their contrasting views on radiofrequency (RF) radiation safety. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s Stance on RF Radiation: Kennedy has been a vocal
Introduction to the Debate The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) misclassification of radiofrequency (RF) radiation risks is a failure to recognize non-thermal effects, akin to society’s resistance to the heliocentric model of the universe centuries ago. Much like how scientific evidence eventually displaced the geocentric view, mounting research now highlights the biological risks of RF radiation
The health risks associated with radiofrequency radiation (RFR) from wireless devices have been a contentious issue for years. With the recent lawsuit brought forward by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. revealing significant gaps in regulatory oversight, it’s crucial to examine the positions of key policymakers, including FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr. While Carr has defended the adequacy
In light of mounting scientific evidence and a pivotal 2021 court ruling, it is imperative to challenge FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr’s documented complacency in addressing the non-thermal risks of radiofrequency (RF) radiation. While Carr’s statements, made prior to the FCC’s legal defeat in 2021, attempted to defend outdated safety standards, the courts have made it
Why RFK Jr. Should Follow France on Wireless Radiation France has set a global example in protecting public health by proactively addressing the risks of wireless radiation, particularly for children. With policies ranging from banning Wi-Fi in nursery schools to mandating radiation exposure labels on cell phones, France’s comprehensive approach prioritizes health over industry interests.
In the first part of this report, we explored the rising rates of head and neck tumors in the United States and the potential link to electromagnetic radiation (EMR) from wireless devices. This second part delves deeper into the scientific evidence, highlighting key studies that have investigated the carcinogenic potential of radiofrequency radiation (RFR) emitted
It’s understandable why parents are concerned about vaccines. The current vaccine schedule could be seen as excessive, and questioning the risk versus reward makes sense. However, there’s an even more pervasive and potentially harmful force impacting your children’s health that often goes unnoticed—electromagnetic fields (EMFs). Many parents, including those in the anti-vaccine community, are unaware
In our increasingly connected world, wireless technology has become indispensable. From smartphones to Wi-Fi networks, radiofrequency radiation (RFR) is an ever-present part of modern life. However, beneath the convenience lies a growing body of scientific evidence suggesting that prolonged exposure to RFR may pose significant health risks—risks that current safety guidelines may not adequately address.
Based on a recent study from Frontiers in Neurology, there’s compelling evidence supporting a causal link between mobile phone use and increased migraine risk. This Mendelian randomization study utilized genetic data to isolate the effects of digital device use—such as mobile phones and television—on migraine incidence, finding significant associations with migraine frequency, especially migraines without
Authors: Shima Abtin, Fatemehsadat Seyedaghamiri, Zahra Aalidaeijavadi, Amir Mohammad Farrokhi, Fazel Moshrefi, Tayebeh Ziveh, Mohammad Ismail Zibaii, Hadi Aliakbarian, Mostafa Rezaei-Tavirani, Abbas Haghparast Abstract Summary: The pervasive use of electromagnetic fields (EMFs) in daily life has raised concerns about their potential health hazards, particularly regarding their effects on the central nervous system (CNS) and cognitive
Ignoring the Invisible: The Danger of Overlooking EMF Exposure The anti-vaccine community often expresses concern for children’s health, particularly around developmental health. However, when this concern becomes so singularly focused that it excludes other scientifically backed environmental risks, like electromagnetic fields (EMFs), it morphs into something more dangerous: Political Derangement Syndrome. The belief that vaccines
In an era where wireless technology is ubiquitous, a growing number of individuals report experiencing adverse health effects due to exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMFs). These individuals, often referred to as “electrosensitive,” have taken drastic measures to find relief—some even relocating to remote areas devoid of modern wireless infrastructure. One such place is Green Bank,
The journal article “Call for consensus debate on mobile phone radiation and health: Are current safety guidelines sufficient to protect everyone’s health?” by Dariusz Leszczynski (Front Public Health, 2022). Debating Mobile Phone Radiation and Public Health: The Urgent Need for Revised Safety Guidelines The rapid expansion of wireless communication technologies, including 5G, has reignited global
Unveiling the Truth Behind Cell Phone Safety Claims On September 30, 2024, the Danish Cancer Registry published a report latest cancer statistics for 2023. The report shows that central nervous system tumors, CNS, including brain tumors, are increasing sharply and are among the most rapidly increasing cancers in the last ten years between 2014 and 2023.
The Unspoken Crisis: In the modern era, wireless technology has seamlessly woven itself into the fabric of daily life. From smartphones and tablets to Wi-Fi routers and smart home devices, our dependence on wireless communication is undeniable. Yet, amidst this technological marvel, a silent crisis looms—one that threatens the very health and well-being of billions
In our increasingly connected world, wireless technologies have become integral to daily life. Smartphones, Wi-Fi networks, and a multitude of wireless devices facilitate instant communication and access to information. However, alongside these conveniences comes a growing concern about the potential health risks associated with exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMF). While regulatory bodies have established
