RF Safe Logo
Phones || SAR Levels

RF Safe Supports RFK’s Choice to Align with Trump for RF-EMF Safety

In a critical moment for public health and technological advancement, RF Safe believes that the alignment between Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Donald Trump is America’s best hope to address the unchallenged risks posed by RF-EMF (radiofrequency electromagnetic field) exposure. For decades, the misclassification of RF radiation health risks, coupled with regulatory capture by corporate interests, has hindered meaningful action on this issue. Now, with this powerful partnership, we see an opportunity to restore balance and put public health at the forefront of federal policy.

The RF-EMF Crisis: A Decades-Long Saga

Wireless technology is deeply embedded in modern life. From cell phones to Wi-Fi, millions of people—adults and children alike—use these devices daily. But as the use of wireless technology has surged, so have concerns about the health risks of RF radiation. Numerous studies have pointed to the potential dangers of prolonged RF exposure, particularly its connection to cancer and other health issues. Unfortunately, these risks have been downplayed or outright ignored due to the powerful influence of corporate entities over regulatory bodies.

For years, the FCC and other federal agencies have operated under outdated guidelines that fail to account for non-thermal effects of RF exposure. Even as the evidence has grown, the critical research needed to fully understand the risks has been stifled, and nowhere has this been more evident than under Democratic leadership, where promises of technological innovation have overshadowed concerns about public health.

Regulatory Capture and Why Trump-Kennedy is the Solution

The core issue lies in regulatory capture—the process by which regulatory agencies are dominated by the industries they are supposed to oversee. The FCC, in particular, has been slow to update its RF safety guidelines due to significant corporate influence, leaving the public exposed to unaddressed health risks. RFK Jr. has been one of the few figures to challenge this status quo, spearheading lawsuits and advocating for safer regulations that reflect the latest science. But these efforts have faced obstacles from both political and corporate interests.

Donald Trump, while not historically associated with RF-EMF advocacy, brings a unique opportunity to bypass the corporate entanglements that have plagued previous administrations. His willingness to challenge bureaucratic institutions and question entrenched interests makes him a strong partner for Kennedy’s mission to protect public health from unchecked technological advancement. RF Safe believes that a Trump-Kennedy collaboration offers the best chance to break free from corporate influence and restore the federal government’s focus on safeguarding the health of the American people.

A Call to Action for Undecided Voters

If you’re an undecided voter, consider this: all the candidates in this election have a track record when it comes to RF-EMF safety and regulatory policy. Kamala Harris, has not made public health concerns about RF-EMF a priority. The Biden-Harris administration, along with previous Democratic leadership, has allowed out-dated FCC safety guidelines and Biden-Harris ended research funding on the most important issue of our time—cancer caused by RF radiation—to be halted. The Biden-Harris administration’s focus has been on expanding wireless infrastructure without ensuring that it’s safe for the millions of people who use it daily.

RF Safe urges you to stand with RFK Jr. and Trump. Together, they represent the best hope for reclassifying RF radiation as a significant health risk and for reviving the research that has been tragically abandoned. As we face an era where wireless devices are ubiquitous, it’s more important than ever that we take steps to protect the health of both current and future generations.

America’s Best Hope: A Federal Policy Free of Corporate Influence

RF Safe’s choice to support RFK Jr.’s alignment with Donald Trump is not just a political decision—it’s a decision about the future of public health. We can no longer afford to allow corporate interests to dictate the safety guidelines that impact millions of lives. It’s time for a government that prioritizes the health of its people over the profits of corporations.

RF Safe firmly believes that RFK Jr. and Donald Trump, working together, can bring about the changes we desperately need to ensure the safety of all Americans in a wireless world. The time has come for a new era of public health, free from the shadow of corporate influence, where RF-EMF safety is taken seriously at the highest levels of government.

The Misconception of Wireless Radiation Risks

One of the biggest misconceptions about RF radiation is that it only poses a risk if it heats body tissues, known as "thermal effects." Current FCC guidelines are based on Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) limits that only measure thermal impacts. However, modern research has consistently shown that RF radiation has non-thermal biological effects that can damage human health, even when exposure levels are far below the thresholds considered "safe" by the FCC. Children Are Especially at Risk

The outdated standards are particularly concerning for children, whose thinner skulls and still-developing bodies make them more vulnerable to RF radiation. According to a 2019 study by the American Academy of Pediatrics, children absorb two to three times more radiation from cell phones compared to adults. Given that children today are using these devices from an increasingly young age, their lifetime exposure will be significantly higher than that of previous generations.

Major Studies Highlighting the Risks of RF Radiation

Numerous studies have highlighted the dangers of wireless radiation. This includes research from the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, NTP, Ramazzini Institute, REFLEX Project, and the BioInitiative Report. The work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai has collectively pointed towards an increased health risk from cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. Ignoring this research is not only dangerous but also irrational.

Moreover, advancements in RF radiation research have shown that RF radiation has therapeutic potential when used appropriately, challenging the outdated belief that it only has thermal effects. For instance, the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment utilizes RF radiation at power levels far below those emitted by cell phones to effectively treat inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal biological interactions. This development shows that RF radiation can interact with biological systems in ways that go beyond simple heating, providing clear evidence that the FCC's current guidelines are outdated.

The Telecommunications Act of 1996: Silencing Public Health Concerns

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has made it nearly impossible for communities to raise concerns about the health effects of RF radiation. Under this law, local governments are prohibited from considering health risks when making decisions about the placement of cell towers. This effectively takes away the rights of people to protect their families, forcing them to accept the construction of cell towers near schools, homes, and playgrounds.

A Call to Action: We Must Act Now

The science is clear: wireless radiation is a risk to public health. The 2021 court ruling against the FCC was an opportunity to change course, yet the Biden-Harris administration has failed to act. We need a comprehensive federal action plan to update safety standards, protect vulnerable populations, and ensure that wireless radiation is properly regulated based on the best available science.

The current administration's inaction is putting millions of lives at risk. We need leaders who will take these threats seriously, hold regulatory bodies accountable, and protect public health. It is time to end the cycle of corporate influence over public policy and prioritize the well-being of our citizens.

Take Action

We must stand together to demand that our leaders address FCC capture and prioritize public health. Here's how you can help: