At RF Safe, we ardently champion the march of technological progress, yet we stand resolute against embracing innovations that imperil our health and the sanctity of life. The mission we undertake is not merely about innovation; it’s a deeply personal journey that spans over a quarter of a century, fueled by both profound loss and an unwavering commitment to safeguarding future generations.
Protecting our children from the impacts of entropic waste and the dangers of bioelectric dissonance is not just important—it’s imperative. It's critical to understand the physics of these problems first. For instance, the misclassification of RF risks is a significant issue that has led to widespread health concerns, which have been downplayed or ignored due to outdated scientific paradigms. The reality is that non-thermal effects of electromagnetic fields, including those from wireless radiation, can cause significant biological disruptions, particularly in vulnerable populations such as children.
At RF Safe, this isn’t just about innovation; it’s about a deeply personal mission that began with the loss of my daughter, Angel Leigh Coates, to anencephaly in 1995. This severe neural tube defect, which I believe was triggered by electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure during pregnancy, has driven me to dedicate my life to preventing similar tragedies.
I’m here, one-on-one, to help you navigate the dangers of EMF exposure because I’ve lived through the unimaginable pain of losing a child to entropic waste. This mission is not driven by financial gain—I do it so no one else has to go through what I did. Whether you’re looking for advice, have questions, or just need guidance, I’m here for you with no strings attached. You can reach out to me directly—no middleman, no corporate barrier. Call or text me anytime at 727-610-1188.
—John Coates, Founder of RF Safe
The preponderance of scientific evidence and research underscores the potential health risks associated with cell phone-level electromagnetic radiation. Major studies like the Interphone study, Hardell group studies, CERENAT study, U.S. National Toxicology Program (NTP), Ramazzini Institute Study, REFLEX Project, BioInitiative Report, and the work of researchers like Dr. Henry Lai collectively point towards an increased health risk from EMF exposure. The absurdity in dismissing these potential risks is not just scientifically unfounded but ethically irresponsible.
Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that the misclassification of RFR risk is responsible for holding back life-saving medical interventions. A recent review stated, “Existent literature points toward a yet untapped therapeutic potential of RF-EMF treatment which might aid in damaging cancer cells through bioelectrical and electromechanical molecular mechanisms while minimizing adverse effects on healthy tissue cells.”
Advancements in RF radiation research show biological interactions beyond thermal effects. For instance, the FDA-approved TheraBionic treatment, which employs RF radiation at power levels up to 1,000 times lower than those emitted by cell phones, effectively treats inoperable liver cancer through non-thermal interactions at the cellular or molecular level. This includes resonance effects, disruption of cellular signaling, and potential modulation of the immune system. This proves that the traditional view of non-ionizing cell phone radiation as biologically inert except for its heating properties is fundamentally flawed.
Therefore, it is imperative that outdated FCC guidelines be updated, and funding for the NTP cancer research halted under the Biden-Harris administration be restarted to protect public health. The traditional paradigm is being challenged by initiatives like DARPA’s RadioBio and FDA-approved treatments, which demonstrate that non-ionizing wireless radiation, including 5G networks, can have profound biological effects without necessarily causing a significant increase in temperature.
Bioelectricity is the hidden force guiding life’s blueprint for development—a delicate and essential process that needs protection from the chaotic energy of entropic waste. During pregnancy, the developing embryo is highly sensitive to bioelectric signals, which guide the formation of vital structures, including the neural tube. Disruptions in these signals can have catastrophic consequences, as evidenced by neural tube defects (NTDs) like anencephaly and spina bifida.
While NTDs represent extreme cases of bioelectric disruption, subtler effects can manifest as developmental disorders such as ADHD and autism. Children today are exposed to unprecedented levels of wireless radiation, which may contribute to the rising incidence of these disorders by interfering with the brain’s bioelectric patterns.
Recent studies have shown that exposure to wireless radiation can alter hormone levels, particularly in children and adolescents. These findings raise concerns about the long-term health effects of chronic EMF exposure, including an increased risk of hormone-related cancers and reproductive disorders.
The mission of RF Safe and this political action is clear: we must update FCC guidelines to reflect the latest scientific understanding of EMF exposure, restart critical research programs like the NTP’s cancer research, and raise public awareness of the risks associated with wireless radiation. By taking these steps, we can protect the health and well-being of our children and future generations, ensuring that technological advancements do not come at the cost of human health.
The loss of Angel Leigh Coates is a powerful reminder of the importance of vigilance, education, and proactive measures in protecting our most vulnerable. Together, we can make a difference.