For over 25 years, the FCC's SAR safety guidelines have remained unchanged, despite overwhelming scientific evidence suggesting that these standards are outdated and inadequate to protect public health—especially that of our children. In a landmark lawsuit led by RFK Jr. and the Environmental Health Trust (EHT), a U.S. Court of Appeals ruled that the FCC had failed to adequately explain why its standards do not account for the effects of radiation exposure on children, or consider the mounting evidence of non-thermal biological effects from wireless radiation.
The court's decision underscores the urgent need to revise these guidelines to reflect the current state of scientific knowledge, including risks related to hormonal changes, reproductive health, cancer, and birth defects. With children being especially vulnerable due to their thinner skulls and developing brains, regulatory agencies can no longer afford to ignore these significant health concerns.
The time is now to demand that our government take action to protect public health by updating the SAR safety guidelines to ensure they reflect the latest science. This is not just about technological advancements; it’s about safeguarding future generations.
The telecommunications industry wields significant influence over regulatory bodies like the FCC, often resulting in guidelines that prioritize industry profits over public health. This regulatory capture is a critical issue that must be addressed to ensure that safety standards are based on science, not industry lobbying.
Children are not small adults. Their thinner skulls and rapidly developing brains make them more susceptible to radiation exposure. The current guidelines do not adequately protect children, who are increasingly exposed to wireless devices at younger ages.
Emerging research links wireless radiation exposure to hormonal imbalances and reproductive issues. These effects are particularly concerning for pregnant women and developing fetuses, as well as adolescents going through critical stages of growth.
The link between wireless radiation and cancer is supported by numerous studies, yet the FCC's guidelines continue to rely on outdated assumptions that downplay these risks. It's imperative that the guidelines be updated to consider the latest research, including findings that show increased cancer risks at radiation levels currently deemed "safe."
The potential for wireless radiation to cause birth defects and developmental issues is an area of growing concern. Animal studies have shown that exposure to radiation during pregnancy can result in a range of health problems for offspring, from physical malformations to cognitive impairments.
With the rapid evolution of wireless technology, it is essential that safety standards keep pace with scientific discoveries. The FCC must adopt guidelines that reflect our current understanding of the biological effects of radiation, rather than relying on outdated models that fail to protect the public.